Case law

Fierro v. Gomez

865 F. Supp. 1387 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 1994

V. Defendants’ Experts Defendants presented their evidence concerning the effects of hydrocyanic gas on humans through two experts. 1) Dr. Steven Baskin is a board certified toxicologist. … See id. at 692-93, 693 n. 2 (Reinhardt, Browning, Tang, D.W.

United States v. Roland

27 F. Cas. 891 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 1863

The claim was rejected by the board. … The decision of the board, rejecting the claim, must therefore be affirmed.

Meyer v. Capital Crossing Bank (In Re California Western Railroad)

303 B.R. 201 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 13, 2003

It never filed anything with the Surface Transportation Board. … Gibbs v. Babbitt, 214 F.3d 483, 494 (4th Cir.2000); United States v. Taylor, 966 F.2d 830, 835-36 (4th Cir.1992).

Cooper v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 2024

See Balistreri v. … Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 4 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v.

In re Ho Quai Sin

84 F. 310 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 7, 1898

The special referee was justified in rejecting the positive testimony of the petitioner and the other witnesses, given in her behalf, under the principle of law declared in Quock Ting v. U. S., 140 U. S. 417 , 11 Sup. … When first examined by the customs officers, on board the steamer Coptic, the petitioner stated that she was born in China, but had been told to report her birthplace as San Francisco, Cal.

Hawkins v. Berkeley Unified School District

250 F.R.D. 459 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2008

See, e.g., Brown v. … See Board of Educ. v.

Greer v. Wormuth

District Court, N.D. California · May 22, 2024

(See Compl. ¶ 6); see also Brown v. … See Clark County School Dist. v.

Ex parte Yasuda

22 F.2d 864 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1927

The Board of Review disposed of the case as follows: “Excluded as an alien ineligible to. citizenship and as LPC. … Antonini v. Curran (C. C.

State of California v. United States

151 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 1957

Brown v. Superior Court, 34 Cal.2d 559 , 212 P.2d 878 ). As against a motion to dismiss, the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint appear sufficient to entitle it to .proceed on the latter theory. … United States, D.C., 135 F.Supp. 651 ; Barroll v. United States, D.C., 135 F.Supp. 441 ; Lauterbach v. United States, D.C., 95 F. Supp. 479 ; North v. United States, D.C., 94 F.Supp. 824 ; Boyce v.

Beutler Sheetmetal Works v. McMorgan & Co.

616 F. Supp. 453 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1985

Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242, 244 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918). Thus, under Section 1 there must be concerted action. Independent action is not proscribed. Monsanto Co. v. … In Austin v.

Piva v. Xerox Corp.

70 F.R.D. 378 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 1975

In Rich v. … In Hill v.

Zandi-Dulabi v. Pacific Retirement Plans Inc.

828 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 24, 1993

Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58, 63 , 107 S.Ct. 1542, 1546 , 95 L.Ed.2d 55 (1987); Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. … See Franchise Tax Board v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 26 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2855 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983).

Denicke v. Anglo California Nat. Bank

45 F. Supp. 524 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 29, 1942

The first petition included a similar action (Denicke v. Mortimer Fleishhacker et al., No. 21161-R) pending before my associate Judge Roche. … This secondary or derivative action stems from the case of Blum v.

Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.

61 F. 338 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 10, 1894

Morgan v. Southern Pac. Co., 95 Cal. 521 , 30 Pac. 601 ; Cheatham v. Bed Biver Line, 56 Fed. 248 ; In re Humboldt Lumber Mann firs’ Ass’n, 60 Fed. 428 . … The supreme court of this state, in Morgan v. Southern Pac.

Shirer v. Hackel

330 F. Supp. 369 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 12, 1970

The Conscientious Objector Review Board found that the lateness of petitioner’s application “cast serious doubt on the sincerity of his professed beliefs”. … Bates v. Cmndr. etc., 1 Cir., 413 F.2d 475 (1969); Ross v. McLaughlin, D.C., 308 F.Supp. 1019 (1970); Owens v. Cmndg. Gen’l, D.C., 307 F.Supp. 285 (1969); Gresham v. Franklin, 315 F.Supp. 850, 1970 (N.D.

Meyer v. Pacific Mail Steamship Co.

58 F. 923 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 1893

Andrews v. Insurance Co., 3 Mason, 6 -16. … Andrews v. Insurance Co., supra; Williams v. Insurance Co., 56 Fed. 159 .

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Nadkarni

391 F. Supp. 3d 917 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 2019

Knievel v. ESPN , 393 F.3d 1068 , 1076 (9th Cir. 2005) ( citing Parrino v. … Sylve v. Riley , 15 Cal. App. 4th 23 , 26, 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 608 (1993) ; Menefee v. Ostawari, 228 Cal.

Viceroy Gold Corp. v. Aubry

858 F. Supp. 1007 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 1994

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2209 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). … See Naismith Dental Corp. v. Board of Dental Examiners, 68 Cal.App.3d 253 , 137 Cal.Rptr. 133 (1977). In Palermo v.

Scheiner v. St. Jovite

180 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 1960

Stickney and Curr went over the side to help him board and St. Jovite then drove to Bauman Bros., where aid was summoned immediately. It is libelant’s contention that St. … Isaacson v. Jones, 9 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 599 .

United States v. De Rodriguez

25 F. Cas. 821 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 26, 1864

S. v. … S. v. Fossat] 21 How. [62 U.