Case law

Beutler Sheetmetal Works v. McMorgan & Co.

616 F. Supp. 453 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1985

Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242, 244 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918). Thus, under Section 1 there must be concerted action. Independent action is not proscribed. Monsanto Co. v. … In Austin v.

Seitz v. International Brotherhood Teamsters

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 17, 2023

Id. 16 Here, the plaintiff was not completely denied an arbitration, because his System Board of 17 Adjustment hearing was an arbitration. Int’l Ass’n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. … Galindo v. Stoody Co., 11 793 F.2d 1502, 1509 (9th Cir. 1986); Brown v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., 642 F. Supp. 3d 1259, 1266 12 (W.D. Wash. 2022).

Meyer v. Capital Crossing Bank (In Re California Western Railroad)

303 B.R. 201 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 13, 2003

It never filed anything with the Surface Transportation Board. … Gibbs v. Babbitt, 214 F.3d 483, 494 (4th Cir.2000); United States v. Taylor, 966 F.2d 830, 835-36 (4th Cir.1992).

Boxall v. Sequoia Union High School District

464 F. Supp. 1104 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 9, 1979

See, e. g., Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 , 94 S.Ct. 786 , 39 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974); Bossier Parish School Board v. … Eberle v. Board of Public Education, 444 F.Supp. 41, 44 (D.Pa.1977).

Ex parte Yasuda

22 F.2d 864 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1927

The Board of Review disposed of the case as follows: “Excluded as an alien ineligible to. citizenship and as LPC. … Antonini v. Curran (C. C.

Herrera-Ramos v. CDCR

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 2025

See Estelle v. … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. Of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 22 403 (1997).

Lorenzetti v. American Trust Co.

45 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, N.D. California · May 19, 1942

Since the Act applies to industries “affecting commerce” the Board did not find it necessary to decide whether banks are actually engaged in commerce. … Co. v.

In re Storror

63 F. 564 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 2, 1894

Amey v. Long, 9 East, 473. … Those conclusions'are supported by Ex parte Brown, 72 Mo. 83 ; U. S. v. Babcock, 3 Dill. 566 , Fed. Cas. No. 14,484; U. S. v. Hunter, 15 Fed. 712 ; Henisler v. Freedman, 2 Pars. Eq. Cas. 274; National Bank v.

In Re Gupta Corp. Securities Litigation

900 F. Supp. 1217 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 1994

Carlisle (“Carlisle”), a Director of Gupta and member of the Board of Director’s committees on audit and compensation. I. … Burgess v. Premier Corp., 727 F.2d 826, 832 (9th Cir.1984). Similarly, Novell’s position as a minority shareholder of Gupta with an agent on the board does not establish control person liability. O’Sullivan v.

Bornholdt v. Southern Pacific Co.

209 F. Supp. 310 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 1962

See Lemon v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway, 38 Cal.App.2d 659 , 102 P.2d 387 . Plaintiffs, in support of their position, make numerous assertions which are not borne out by the record nor the authorities. … Brown v. Bachelder, 214 Cal. 753 , 7 P.2d 1027 ; Anderson v. Citizens’ Savings & Trust Co., 185 Cal. 386 , 197 P. 113 .

United States v. Romero

71 F. Supp. 2d 1021 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 16, 1999

In United States v. … In United States v.

Construction Ind. Ass'n of Sonoma Cty. v. City of Petaluma

375 F. Supp. 574 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 1974

The first of the series was Bilbar Construction v. Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 62 , 141 A.2d 851 (1958), in which the Supreme Court stressed its continued agreement with the Euclid 2 standard of constitutionality. … United States, 332 U.S. 392 , 68 S.Ct. 12 , 92 L.Ed. 20 (1947); United States v. Jefferson County School Board, 372 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1966), corrected 380 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1967).

In re Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation

264 F. Supp. 3d 1040 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 2017

FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000). … In support of this “new action” requirement, Wyoming relies on Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade v. City of New York, 633 F.Supp.2d 83 (S,D.N.Y. 2009).

Nakao v. Rushen

580 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 21, 1984

See British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 952 (9th Cir. 1978). Therefore, plaintiffs maintain that they are entitled to partial summary judgment. … See Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 898 U.S. 144 , 158 n. 17, 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 1608 n. 17, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d at 952 ; Gordon v.

Ambrosino v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

899 F. Supp. 438 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 14, 1995

In Ham v. … Pinsker v.

Maita v. Whitmore

365 F. Supp. 1331 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 1973

Brown, 354 U.S. 436, 440 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957). … Sullivan, supra and Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, supra. Petitioner received prompt notice, a specific complaint, an adversary hearing, and an opportunity to contest the outcome of the hearing in the appellate courts.

McCormick-Morgan, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.

91 Daily Journal DAR 2024 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 1991

MMI cites American Standard Inc. v. … In Hercules Inc. v.

Thomas v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corp.

167 F. Supp. 3d 1029 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 4, 2016

Howard v. … Merck & Co. v.

United States v. Roland

27 F. Cas. 891 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 1863

The claim was rejected by the board. … The decision of the board, rejecting the claim, must therefore be affirmed.

Cooper v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 2024

See Balistreri v. … Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 4 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v.