Case law

United States Ex Rel. O'Hare v. Eichstaedt

285 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 26, 1967

See Brown v. McNamara, 263 F.Supp. 686 (D.C.N.J.1967), in which case petitioner had enlisted in the Army; Chevez v. … See Brown v. McNamara, supra, 263 F.Supp. p. 691.

Installit, Inc. v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board

214 F. Supp. 3d 855 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 2016

Exp., Inc. v. … Coors Brewing Co. v.

Brown v. City Of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 18, 2025

Corp. v. … The Court focuses on the actual alleged accusation against Brown, 1 Brown v. City of San Jose, 748 F. Supp. 3d 793, 799 (N.D.

Brown v. Beazley USA Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 2025

Libhart v. … Chavez v.

Cal. Parents for the Equal. of Educ. Materials v. Torlakson

370 F. Supp. 3d 1057 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 2019

v. … Brown , 27 F.3d at 1379 . A reasonable observer is also not aware of undisclosed intent. See McCreary Cty. v.

Madrid v. Board of Education of Gilroy Unified School District

429 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 1977

This matter is before the court on defendant school board’s motion for a summary judgment. … However, a more efficacious solution is to grant this motion in light of General Electric Co. v.

M. S. Cowen Co. v. American President Lines, Ltd.

167 F. Supp. 838 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 1958

Upon unloading, the shipment was found to be infested with saw-tooth grain beetles, tiny brown insects about one-tenth of an inch long. … Kupfermann v. United States, 2 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 348, 350 . Libelant bears the burden of proving the sound condition of his goods at the time of shipment. Albers Bros. Milling Co. v.

Estate of Leonard Brown v. Alameda County

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 2023

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ESTATE OF LEONARD BROWN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05457-VC Plaintiffs … Neylon v. County of Inyo, No. 1:16-CV-0712 AWI JLT, 2017 WL 3670925, at *10 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2017).

Anderson v. The Mary Garrett

63 F. 1009 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 1894

The Plymouth, 3 Wall. 20 ; The Rock Island Bridge, 6 Wall. 213 ; The Neil Cochran, 1 Brown’s Adm. 162, Fed. Cas: No. 10,087; The Ottawa, 1 Brown’s Adm. 356, Fed. Cas. … The Neil Cochran, 1- Brown’s Adm. 162, Fed. Cas. No. 10,087, and cases cited above.

Burroughs v. Board of Tr. of Pens. Tr. F. for Op. Engrs.

398 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 25, 1975

The scope of judicial review in this action is restricted to determining whether the action of the Board of Trustees of the Pension Fund was arbitrary or capricious. Kosty v. … Kosty v. Lewis, supra. 6.

Williams v. The Sirius

65 F. 226 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 2, 1895

The case of Gurney v. … No. 5,289; Pitman v. Hooper, 3 Sumn. 286 , Fed. Cas. No. 11,186; Brown v. Lull, 2 Sumn. 443 , Fed. Cas. No. 2,018; The Jane and Matilda, 1 Hagg. Adm. 187; The Canton, 1 Spr. 437 , Fed. Cas. No. 2,388.

Brown v. City Of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 2024

Chaudhry v. Aragon, 68 F.4th 1161, 1171 (9th Cir. 2023). 23 Brown anchors her Section 1983 claim on alleged deprivations of procedural due process 24 under the Fourteenth Amendment. … Hyland 17 v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1141 (9th Cir. 1992).

Brown v. City National Bank

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 2024

Moss v. … See Sanders v. Brown, 25 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2007). The court may consider matters that are properly the subject of 26 judicial notice, Knievel, 393 F.3d at 1076; Lee v.

Brown v. Citi Mortgage, inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 2023

No. 15 (citing Pangea Legal Servs. v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 19 512 F. Supp. 3d 966, 972 (N.D. Cal. 2021)). … Brown is not required to post a bond under Federal Rule 1 harm from maintaining the status quo pending a resolution on the merits.

Brown v. City of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 2024

Green v. … To state a civil RICO claim, a 27 plaintiff must allege “(1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering 1 Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510 (9th Cir. 1996); Synopsys, Inc. v.

California Ex Rel. State Air Resources Board v. Department of the Navy

431 F. Supp. 1271 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 12, 1977

Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 272 U.S. 605, 611 [ 47 S.Ct. 207, 209 , 71 L.Ed. 432 ]; Allen-Bradley Local v. Wisconsin Employment Board, 315 U.S. 740, 749 [ 62 S.Ct. 820, 825 , 86 L.Ed. 1154 ]. … Brown, 317 U.S. 341 [ 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 ]; and has, on the other hand, struck down state statutes where the respective purposes were quite dissimilar, First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v.

Fraticelli v. Board of Education of the Milpitas Unified School District

332 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 1, 1971

Also, see the admonition contained in the National Association of Naturopathic Physicians, etc., v. The California State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, etc., et al., 9 Cir., 442 F.2d 466 (1971). … See, Berkeley Unified School Dist. v. City of Berkeley, 141 Cal.App.2d 841 , 297 P.2d 710 (1956); Rose v. California, 19 Cal.2d 713 , 123 P.2d 505 (1942); and Brill v.

Brown v. APL Maritime Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 1, 2023

Brown highlights two cases in particular: Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. 22 Steamship Co., 348 U.S. 336, 340 (1955) and Pashby v. Universal Dredging Corp., 608 F.2d 1312 23 (9th Cir. 1979). … Id. at 341. 7 In the second case cited by Brown, Pashby v.

Gateway Structures, Inc. v. Carpenters' 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board

681 F. Supp. 1437 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 2, 1987

See Gateway Structures, Inc. v. Carpenters’ 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board, 779 F.2d 485 (9th Cir.1985). … Gateway Structures, Inc. v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board, 804 F.2d 145 (9th Cir.1986). Both sides have moved for summary judgment on the jurisdictional issue.

Gann v. Wilson

289 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 9, 1968

Hedrick, 284 F.Supp. 250 (N.D.Cal.1968); Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1968); Brown v. McNamara, 387 F.2d 150 (3d Cir. 1967) (cert. denied Brown v. Clifford, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L. … Hedrick, supra; Hammond v. Lenfest, supra; Brown v. McNamara, supra).