Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.85s

  • Oracle Corp. v. Falotti

    187 F. Supp. 2d 1184 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 2001

    In Greene v. … In P v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • County of Santa Cruz, Cal. v. Ashcroft

    314 F. Supp. 2d 1000 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2004

    See id. ¶ 28. *1004 Less than two weeks after the DEA’s September 5, 2002 raid, the County’s Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution condemning the raid and urging the federal government not to indict the Corrals for their … Brown III and William B. Simpkins, who served as Acting Administrators of the DEA. 5 . This issue was expressly reserved by the Supreme Court in United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Hummer Winblad Venture Partners

    354 F. Supp. 2d 1113 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 3, 2005

    Evaluations, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 39 F.3d 951, 954 (9th Cir.1994) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. … Laird v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Whelan

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 15, 2026

    Smartt v. Kijakazi, 53 F.4th 489, 493 (9th Cir. 2022). The Court will thus remand to the Social Security Commissioner for further pro- ceedings. Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 495–96 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495-96. Conflicts and ambiguities exist in the record, so the case is remanded for further proceedings, not payment of benefits. See id. IT IS SO ORDERED.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Doe v. State Bar of California

    415 F. Supp. 308 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 24, 1976

    In MacKay v. … In MTM, Inc. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Marovic

    69 F. Supp. 2d 1190 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 1999

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction over appeals from either the Board of Contract Appeals or the Court of Claims. United States v. … In United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Levin v. City & County of San Francisco

    257 F. Supp. 3d 1092 · District Court, N.D. California · May 30, 2017

    The City elects a Board of Supervisors that may act only by. ordinance and is expressly forbidden from interfering in administrative affairs. 3 See S.F. Charter §§ 2.101, 2.105, 2.114. … San Jose vests “[a]U powers of the City” in a city council that, like San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors, may only act “by ordinance.” S.J. Charter §§ 400, 600.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shannon v. UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COM'N

    444 F. Supp. 354 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1977

    Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332 [ 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 ] (1976). Cf. Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 166 [ 94 S.Ct. 1633 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 ] (1974); Board of Regents v. … State Board of Elections, supra [ 393 U.S. 544 ], at 572 [ 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 ].

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kirchoff v. Southern Pac. Co.

    68 F. Supp. 877 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 18, 1946

    In Boston & Maine Railroad v. … Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Zandi-Dulabi v. Pacific Retirement Plans Inc.

    828 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 24, 1993

    Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58, 63 , 107 S.Ct. 1542, 1546 , 95 L.Ed.2d 55 (1987); Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. … See Franchise Tax Board v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 26 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2855 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Alpi International, Ltd. v. Anga Supply, LLC

    118 F. Supp. 3d 1172 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2015

    Printex Indus., Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc., 676 F.3d 841, 848 (9th Cir.2012) (citing Shaw v. Lindheim, 919 F.2d 1353, 1355 (9th Cir.1990)). … See Derek Andrew, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Denicke v. Anglo California Nat. Bank

    45 F. Supp. 524 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 29, 1942

    The first petition included a similar action (Denicke v. Mortimer Fleishhacker et al., No. 21161-R) pending before my associate Judge Roche. … This secondary or derivative action stems from the case of Blum v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Saddozai v. Bolanos

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 2020

    Nor can a city or county 5 be held vicariously liable for the unconstitutional acts of its employees under the theory of 6 respondeat superior, see Board of Cty. Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 7 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th 8 Cir. 1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Besig v. Friend

    463 F. Supp. 1053 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 4, 1979

    Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 674 , [ 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 ] (1963) * * * The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Canton v. … England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411 , 84 S.Ct. 461 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brice v. Plain Green, LLC.

    372 F. Supp. 3d 955 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 12, 2019

    Neither plaintiffs nor the Haynes defendants produced the loan agreement between Browne and Plain Green. … There is some overlap in the putative classes because prospective plaintiffs in Gingras include California consumers who obtained loans from Plain Green, like Browne here.

    Reversed on other grounds by Kimetra Brice v. Haynes Investments, LLC, 13 F.4th 823 (2021)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bovich v. United States

    70 F. Supp. 482 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 30, 1947

    See Crockett v. Brandt, 2 Cir., 271 F. 415 ; The Nacoochee, D.C. Mass., 275 F. 876 . … The Cricket, 9 Cir., 71 F.2d 61, 63 ; Roberts v. United Fisheries Vessels Co., 1 Cir., 141 F.2d 288, 293 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n

    229 F. Supp. 2d 1008 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 16, 2002

    The board of inquiry issued its report on October 8. The board concluded that the PMA and the ILWU would not resolve the port shutdown within a reasonable time. … United Steel Workers of America v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Godfrey

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 2025

    First, they contend cases like Jackson v. … See Swint v. 27 Chambers Cnty.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Glaeser v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

    57 F. Supp. 198 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 25, 1944

    Ass’n v. … This case has been repeatedly cited with approval. *201 Plaintiff relies strongly on Brown v. Continental Casualty Company, 161 La. 229 , 108 So. 464, 467 , 45 A.L.R. 1521 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Viceroy Gold Corp. v. Aubry

    858 F. Supp. 1007 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 1994

    Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2209 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). … See Naismith Dental Corp. v. Board of Dental Examiners, 68 Cal.App.3d 253 , 137 Cal.Rptr. 133 (1977). In Palermo v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.