Case law

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Garrett Thompson Construction, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2019

Welfare v 14 Trust Fund for Northern California, et al. filed a Motion for Default Judgment. … TeleVideo Sys., Inc. v.

United States v. Coleman

423 F. Supp. 630 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 1976

See, United States v. Brown, 455 F.2d 1201, 1204 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 960 , 92 S.Ct. 2069 , 32 L.Ed.2d 347 (1972). … Aguilar v. Texas, supra; United States v. Brown, supra.

Parker v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2021

See Balistreri v. … Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 7 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

Katherine G. Ex Rel. Cynthia G. v. Kentfield School District

261 F. Supp. 2d 1159 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 7, 2003

Annette J. v. Clark County Sch. Dist., 267 F.3d 877, 888 (9th Cir.2001) (quoting in part Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District, Westchester County v. … Kirkpatrick v. Lenoir County Board of Education, 216 F.3d 380, 388 (4th Cir.2000).

Kerns v. California Department of Corrections

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 26, 2023

See, e.g., Fortson v. Los Angeles City Atty’s Office, 852 13 F.3d 1190, 1192 (9th Cir. 2017) (Calif. Bureau of Firearms entitled to 11th Amendment 14 immunity); Brown v. Cal. … Dep’t of Corrs., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (California 15 Department of Corrections and California Board of Prison Terms entitled to 11th Amendment 16 immunity); Simmons v.

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, et al. v. A1 Abatement Group, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · May 18, 2026

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Case No. 25-cv-01930-RFL LABORERS HEALTH … See Gimenez v. Gunnar Optiks, LLC, No. 23- CV-0671-AGS, 2024 WL 166003, at *1–2 (S.D. Cal.

Associated General Contractors v. San Francisco Unified School District

544 F. Supp. 845 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 17, 1982

See Associated General Contractors v. San Francisco Unified School District, 431 F.Supp. 854 (N.D.Cal.1977). … See Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399, 428 , 43 S.Ct. 458, 466 , 67 L.Ed. 719 (1922); Reiser v. Del Monte Properties Co., 605 F.2d 1135, 1137, n.2 (9th Cir. 1979); Director, Office of Workers’ Comp.

Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. v. GameMasters

87 F. Supp. 2d 976 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 4, 1999

.; BRIAN BROWN IMPORTS; MAT ELECTRONICS, Inc.; and INNOVATION TECHNOLOGY, Inc. … Johnson v. California State Board of Accountancy, 72 F.3d 1427, 1430 (9th Cir.1995). 7.

Sawyer v. Osterhaus

212 F. 765 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 1914

Rogers’ Locomotive Works v. Emigrant Co., 164 U. S. 568 , 17 Sup. Ct. 188, 41 L. Ed. 552 ; Michigan Land, etc., Co. v. Rust, 168 U. S. 589 , 18 Sup. Ct. 208, 42 L. Ed. 591 ; Brown v. Hitchcock, 173 U. S. 476 , 19 Sup. … In Brown v. Hitchcock the question is put in these plain and unequivocal terms: “Under the Swamp Land Act the legal title passes only on delivery of the patent. So the statute in terms declares.

Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc.

907 F. Supp. 1361 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 21, 1995

See Sega v. … See Supermarket of Homes v. San Fernando Valley Board of Realtors, 786 F.2d 1400 , 1409 (9th Cir.1986).

John Doe 1, et al. v. University of San Francisco, et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 4, 2026

Karasek v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 956 F.3d 1093, 19 1112 (9th Cir. 2020); Reese v. Jefferson Sch. Dist. … In Hickman v.

In re Transpacific Passenger Air Transportation Antitrust Litigation

69 F. Supp. 3d 940 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 23, 2014

Gallo Winery v. EnCana Corp., 503 F.3d 1027, 1035 (2007). … See Brown v.

Benda v. Grand Lodge of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers

442 F. Supp. 431 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1977

Heinz Co. v. Labor Board, 311 U.S. 514, 525-526 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 (1941); NLRB v. Warehousemen’s Union Local 17, 451 F.2d 1240, 1242 (9th Cir. 1971). … Gordon v.

Converse v. United States

109 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 1953

National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc., U. *809 S., 73 S.Ct 287 . … Following Black v.

Hydrostorage, Inc. v. Northern California Boilermakers Local Joint Apprenticeship Committee

685 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, N.D. California · May 4, 1988

Co. v. … In substance, the Appeals Board eliminated one of the findings of willfulness. 2 .

Troglin v. Clanon

378 F. Supp. 281 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 11, 1974

Young v. United States, 485 F.2d 292, 294 (8th Cir. 1973); Brown v. United States, 483 F.2d 116, 118-19 (4th Cir. 1973). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has taken the opposite position. … See United States v. Sawaya, 486 F.2d 890, 893 (1st Cir. 1973); Brown v. United States, supra, 483 F.2d at 118 ; Lipscomb v. Clark, supra, 468 F.2d at 1323 . See also United States v.

In Re: World War II Era Japanese Forced Labor

164 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 2001

Steiner, Mark E Haddad, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, Los Angeles, CA, for Nippon Sharyo Ltd., Nippon Sharyo U.S.A., Inc. Douglas E. … Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984); see also Lehman v.

Brady v. Conseco, Inc.

270 F.R.D. 521 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 6, 2010

Conseco relies primarily on two cases in which courts declined to certify classes which would proceed alongside regulatory actions, Kamm v. California City Development Co., 509 F.2d 205 (9th Cir.1975) and Brown v. … Thus, this case is distinguishable from Brown as well. .

United States v. Romero

71 F. Supp. 2d 1021 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 16, 1999

In United States v. … In United States v.

Eureka Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Flynn

534 F. Supp. 479 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 1982

1) *481 that the validity of due-on-sale clauses is governed by federal law, (2) that Eureka’s exercise of that option was proper, and (3) that Eureka is subject to the regulatory authority of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board … Nalore v. San Diego Federal Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 663 F.2d 841, 842 (9th Cir. 1981). It cannot establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Phillips Petroleum Co. v.