Case law

Western Addition Community Organization v. Alioto

340 F. Supp. 1351 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 1972

Carter v. Gallagher, 452 F.2d 315 (8th Cir. 1971) (involving the Minneapolis Fire Department) ; Chance v. … Board of Examiners, 330 F.Supp. 203 (S.D.N.Y.1971) (involving supervisory personnel of the New York Board of Education) ; Arrington v. Mass.

Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.

464 F. Supp. 2d 948 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 8, 2006

ICANN notes that the 2006 .com Agreement was approved by the ICANN board *954 of directors on February 28, 2006, but has not yet been approved by the DOC. … Todd v. Exxon Corp., 275 F.3d 191, 201-02 (2d Cir.2001). “Congress prescribed a pragmatic, factual approach to the definition of the relevant market and not a formal, legalistic one.” Brown Shoe Co. v.

Conwell

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 24, 2026

Jauregui v. … See Brown Decl. ISO Removal ¶ 8.

Banas v. Volcano Corp.

47 F. Supp. 3d 957 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2014

See Ingram v. … July 1, 2008) (20% across the board reduction because “[i]t is impossible to ascertain from the block billing entries whether the amount of time spent on any separate task performed was reasonable”); Aiello v.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Blankenhorn

22 F.2d 574 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 1, 1927

In Thaxter v. … of review, exhibited the board’s proceedings, and presented the questions which that court was empowered to decide, viz. whether the board pursued its authority and whether any constitutional right, state or federal, was

Donovan Inc. v. Taylor

136 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1955

complaint originally alleged that the defendants acquired the stock through alleged deceptive practices, the uncontroverted facts now disclose that the sale was made to an unknown buyer. 1 Defendant Taylor, as a member of the Board … Joseph v. Farnsworth Radio, etc., Corp., 2 Cir., 198 F.2d 883 , affirming opinion in D.C., 99 F.Supp. 701 .

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City & County of San Francisco

857 F. Supp. 1355 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 1994

National Paint & *1370 Coatings Ass’n v. City of Chicago, 803 F.Supp. 135, 142-43 (N.D.Ill.1992); see also Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 , 234 P. 381, 383 (1925). … Co. v.

Card v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 2, 2024

See Kelly v. … King County, 191 F.3d 1127, 1136 (9th Cir. 1999) (extending absolute immunity to 26 Washington Growth Management Board, a real estate zoning board); Romano v.

Vu v. Singer Co.

538 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 7, 1981

Thompson v. … See Kane v.

San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 2020

Clark v. … Brown v.

Allen v. Faragasso

585 F. Supp. 1114 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 27, 1984

Third, plaintiff could have appealed OWCP’s determination to the Employee Compensation Appeals Board in Washington, D.C. … Review by the Board is limited to the evidence of record; no new evidence would have been considered.

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Garrett Thompson Construction, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2019

Welfare v 14 Trust Fund for Northern California, et al. filed a Motion for Default Judgment. … TeleVideo Sys., Inc. v.

United States v. Coleman

423 F. Supp. 630 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 1976

See, United States v. Brown, 455 F.2d 1201, 1204 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 960 , 92 S.Ct. 2069 , 32 L.Ed.2d 347 (1972). … Aguilar v. Texas, supra; United States v. Brown, supra.

Sawyer v. Osterhaus

212 F. 765 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 1914

Rogers’ Locomotive Works v. Emigrant Co., 164 U. S. 568 , 17 Sup. Ct. 188, 41 L. Ed. 552 ; Michigan Land, etc., Co. v. Rust, 168 U. S. 589 , 18 Sup. Ct. 208, 42 L. Ed. 591 ; Brown v. Hitchcock, 173 U. S. 476 , 19 Sup. … In Brown v. Hitchcock the question is put in these plain and unequivocal terms: “Under the Swamp Land Act the legal title passes only on delivery of the patent. So the statute in terms declares.

Converse v. United States

109 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 1953

National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc., U. *809 S., 73 S.Ct 287 . … Following Black v.

Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. v. GameMasters

87 F. Supp. 2d 976 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 4, 1999

.; BRIAN BROWN IMPORTS; MAT ELECTRONICS, Inc.; and INNOVATION TECHNOLOGY, Inc. … Johnson v. California State Board of Accountancy, 72 F.3d 1427, 1430 (9th Cir.1995). 7.

SARATOGA S & L v. Federal Home Loan Bank

724 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 7, 1989

As the Ninth Circuit held in Harmsen v. … Sea-Land Service, Inc. v.

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. RMT Landscape Contractors, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 2020

(Lauziere Decl. ¶ 16; 27 Liquidated Damage Program - Board Policy, Lauziere Decl., Ex. H.) … Kemmis v.

Parker v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2021

See Balistreri v. … Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 7 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

Wenger v. Lumisys, Inc.

2 F. Supp. 2d 1231 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 1998

See, e.g., Williams v. … Partnership v.