Case law

Cesario v. Vistagen Therapeutics Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 2025

Singh1 by May 14, 2025, and 24 Defendants Vistagen Therapeutics Inc. and Withum Smith & Brown PC by June 9, 2025. … Adler, and Tim Lugo; and (3) added Vistagen 1 Flores v. Doe Agent 1, No. 24-CV-01189-JES-MSB, 2025 WL 96290, at *1 (S.D. Cal.

Ruiz v. Spearman

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 13, 2020

Lambert v. … He further asserts that—when combined with the fact that Governor Brown was reversing 9 || parole grants at a far lower rate than previous governors—the board’s overall grant rate shows 10 || that, at the time of

Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.

254 F.R.D. 597 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 29, 2008

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 597 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993); Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 942-43 (9th Cir.2007). … Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530, 1538-39 (Fed.Cir.1983); see Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Morris Inc., 229 F.3d 1120, 1129 (Fed.Cir.2000).

Lynch v. Matterport, Inc

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 2023

Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 27 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). … Kroessler v.

Ruiz v. Spearman

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 2020

Lambert v. … He further asserts that—when combined with the fact that Governor Brown was reversing 9 || parole grants at a far lower rate than previous governors—the board’s overall grant rate shows 10 || that, at the time of Mr.

Williams v. Miller

48 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 7, 1942

rudimentary administrative principles of the contracting business as the board deems necessary for the safety and protection of the public” (§ 7068, St.1941, p. 2604). … In Borden’s Farm Products Co. v.

True Gentlemen's Jerky, Inc. v. 1K1V TGJ Holdings, LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 16, 2022

Sebastian Brown Prods., LLC v. Muzooka, Inc., 143 F. Supp. 3d 1026, 1037 13 (N.D. Cal. 2015) (quotation marks and citations omitted). … Anita Silingo v.

Friends of Yosemite v. Frizzell

420 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 1976

Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), is misplaced. … See Lathan v.

Sims v. Diaz

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 9, 2019

Rhodes v. … Atascadero State Hosp. v. 17 Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 237-38 (1985). Eleventh Amendment immunity also extends to suits against 18 an arm of the state, such as the CDCR and prisons within the CDCR. See Brown v.

California Trucking Ass'n v. Corcoran

74 F.R.D. 534 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 1977

Burroughs v. Board of Trustees, 542 F.2d 1128 (9th Cir. 1976); Alvares v. Erickson, 514 F.2d 156 (9th Cir. 1975). See also, Lugo v. Employees Retirement Fund, 366 F.Supp. 99 (E.D.N.Y.1973); Insley v. … Burroughs v. Board of Trustees, supra, 542 F.2d at 1130 (emphasis added).

Bowles v. Chew

53 F. Supp. 787 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 13, 1944

Cudahy Packing Co. v. … Defendant’s construction of Sec. 205 (e), following the reasoning of Judge Hall in Brown v. Glick Bros.

Gomez v. City of Fremont

730 F. Supp. 2d 1056 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 2010

The warrant describes Estrada as a hispanic male, brown hair, brown eyes, 6'2", 240 pounds, date of birth of xx/xx/1984, making him age 21 on November 5, 2005, and it lists an address in Hollister, California. Ex. … The Severance report describes Plaintiff as a hispanic male, brown hair, brown eyes, 5'10, 188 pounds, date of birth xx/ xx/1963, making him age 42 that day. Exh. D to Fox Declaration, ECF No. 68 at 24.

Wolfe v. George

385 F. Supp. 2d 1004 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2005

Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 262 , 109 S.Ct. 2909 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989); see, e.g., Fong Yue Ting v. … (quoting United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 445 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 , *1019 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965)).

Lopez-Alegria v. Ilchert

632 F. Supp. 932 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 14, 1986

. §§ 243.4 , 103.3; see also Wang v. INS, 622 F.2d 1341, 1349 (9th Cir.1980) (to review decision adequately, Board must specifiy its reasons). … Her nandez-Ortiz v. INS, 777 F.2d 509, 514 (9th Cir.1985).

O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

150 F. Supp. 3d 1095 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 10, 2015

The vast majority of courts have not followed the Board’s rulings. The Second, Fifth, and Eighth Circuits have specifically considered the Board’s ruling in In re D.R. … Horton, Inc. and declined to follow its reasoning, noting that the Board’s interpretation is contrary to the Supreme Court’s ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v.

Topia Technology, Inc. v. Box, Inc., et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 2026

First, in 2 distinguishing the ’607 patent from Brown, “Topia stated Brown did not ‘teach[] a server system 3 automatically transferring’” because Brown’s file synchronization “‘must be initiated by the client 4 … Topia also distinguished the Brown and Sigurdsson patents “on the ground both 8 references taught ‘a HTTP server’ which ‘does not perform functions “automatically” without 9 client requests,’” so the Brown and Sigurdsson

District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees v. Lidini Company

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 28, 2020

Meadows 5 v. Dominican Republic, 817 F.2d 517, 521 (9th Cir. 1987) (citing Pena v. Seguros La 6 Comercial, S.A., 770 F.2d 811, 814 (9th Cir. 1985)). … (citing Pena, 770 F.2d at 815; Benny v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Serramonte

237 F.R.D. 220 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 2006

Saundra Brown Armstrong) as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) and Civil Local Rule 72. … Fritsch, 187 F.R.D. at 625-626 , citing Vanderbilt v.

Coalition for Economic Equity v. Wilson

946 F. Supp. 1480 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 23, 1996

Wilson v. State Personnel Board, 96-CS01082 (App. to File Mot. to Amend, Nov., 6 1996). Moreover, a conflict between the plaintiffs’ interests and the challenged amendment is inevitable. Babbitt v. … Cohen v. Brown University, 101 F.3d 155 (1st Cir.1996). 50 . Plaintiffs footnote two Ninth Circuit cases and several regulations which adopt Title VII’s disparate impact test in the context of Titles VI and IX.

Tolbert v. Colley

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 2022

Local governments may not be held liable for the unconstitutional acts of its 25 employees, see Board of Cty. Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997), unless 26 official policy or custom causes the constitutional violation, see Monell v.