Case law

O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

150 F. Supp. 3d 1095 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 10, 2015

The vast majority of courts have not followed the Board’s rulings. The Second, Fifth, and Eighth Circuits have specifically considered the Board’s ruling in In re D.R. … Horton, Inc. and declined to follow its reasoning, noting that the Board’s interpretation is contrary to the Supreme Court’s ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v.

The Queen

184 F. 537 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 10, 1910

Cooley v. Board of Wardens, etc., 12 How. 299 , 13 L. Ed. 996 . … Olsen v. Smith, 195 U. S. 332 , 25 Sup. Ct. 52, 49 L. Ed. 224 ; Sprague v. Thompson, 118 U. S. 95 , 6 Sup. Ct. 988, 30 L. Ed. 115 ; The Carrie L. Tyler, 106 Fed. 422 , 45 C. C. A. 374 , 54 L. R.

Cesario v. Vistagen Therapeutics Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 2025

Singh1 by May 14, 2025, and 24 Defendants Vistagen Therapeutics Inc. and Withum Smith & Brown PC by June 9, 2025. … Adler, and Tim Lugo; and (3) added Vistagen 1 Flores v. Doe Agent 1, No. 24-CV-01189-JES-MSB, 2025 WL 96290, at *1 (S.D. Cal.

Jarose v. County of Humboldt

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 2020

Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 18 232 F.3d 1271, 1294 (9th Cir. 2000) (citing Johnson v. … United States v. 26 DJO Glob., Inc., 678 F.

Western Homes, Inc. v. United States

129 F. Supp. 792 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 1955

This specific issue has been considered by our Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in two cases, Rollingwood Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1951, 190 F.2d 263 ; McGah v. … In McGah v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 210 F.2d 769 , a different situation existed than in the instant case.

Knowles v. Butz

358 F. Supp. 228 · District Court, N.D. California · May 16, 1973

See Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965). … Co. v. Commissioner, 297 U.S. 129, 134 , 56 S.Ct. 397, 400 , 80 L.Ed. 528 (1936). The statutory definition of “household,” 7 U.S.C. § 2012 (e), as modified by Moreno v.

(PC) Lovell v. East Oakland Police Department

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2023

Clegg v. … See Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); 9 Monell, 436 U.S. at 691.

Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Blue Lake Forest Products, Inc. (In Re Blue Lake Forest Products, Inc.)

143 B.R. 563 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 1992

But the Supreme Court has also said that in construing this ‘admittedly ambiguous’ statute, Board of Comm’rs v. … See Oneida Indian Nation of New York State v.

Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

793 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 12, 1992

Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 9 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2846 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420, 430 (1983). … Utley v.

Transamerica Corp. v. Lewis

28 F. Supp. 765 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 9, 1939

At the first meeting of the board of directors after the purchase of stock, held in January 1936, the retirement of the stock was recommended by resolution, which was approved by a stockholders’ meeting on March 26, 1936, … Helvering v. Watts, 1935, 296 U.S. 387 , 56 S.Ct. 275 , 80 L.Ed. 289 ; United States v. Cerecedo Hermanosy Compania, 1908, 209 U.S. 337 , 28 S.Ct. 532 , 52 L.Ed. 821 ; White v.

Inari Medical, Inc. v. Imperative Care, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 2025

Brown Decl. ¶ 72. … See Brown Dep.

United States v. Lumber Products Ass'n

42 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 14, 1942

V. … Heike v. United States, supra; Mason v. United States, supra; O’Connell v. United States, 2 Cir., 40 F.2d 201, 204 .

Gibraltar Building & Loan Ass'n v. State Savings & Loan Ass'n

607 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, N.D. California · May 2, 1985

See North Mississippi Savings and Loan Association v. … Corp. v. Fed. Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp., 492 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir.1974).

Informix Software, Inc. v. Oracle Corp.

927 F. Supp. 1283 · District Court, N.D. California · May 30, 1996

Imports, Inc. v. … It may be that most trademark cancellations are brought before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

Banas v. Volcano Corp.

47 F. Supp. 3d 957 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2014

See Ingram v. … July 1, 2008) (20% across the board reduction because “[i]t is impossible to ascertain from the block billing entries whether the amount of time spent on any separate task performed was reasonable”); Aiello v.

Von Brimer v. Whirlpool Corporation

367 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 1973

Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co., 26 Cal.2d 412, 437 , 159 P.2d 958, 972 (1945). See also Helfer v. … Board of Pension Com’rs., 18 Cal.2d 427, 431 , 116 P.2d 37, 39 (1941) (city charter required Board action before court proceedings permitted); see also Eistrat v.

Barrett v. Brumfield

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 6, 2023

See Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 942-43 (9th Cir. 2005) (“the applicable statute of 20 limitations must be tolled while a prisoner completes the mandatory exhaustion process”). … Soto v.

Topia Technology, Inc. v. Box, Inc., et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 2026

First, in 2 distinguishing the ’607 patent from Brown, “Topia stated Brown did not ‘teach[] a server system 3 automatically transferring’” because Brown’s file synchronization “‘must be initiated by the client 4 … Topia also distinguished the Brown and Sigurdsson patents “on the ground both 8 references taught ‘a HTTP server’ which ‘does not perform functions “automatically” without 9 client requests,’” so the Brown and Sigurdsson

In Re Atm Fee Antitrust Litigation

768 F. Supp. 2d 984 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 2009

See Brennan v. … In Ashcroft v.

Turner v. West County Detention Facility

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 8, 2022

Pierce v. … Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 18 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v.