Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

2.57s

  • Aliotti v. Vessel Senora

    217 F.R.D. 496 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 2, 2003

    Steven Cvitanovic of Haight, Brown & Bonesteel appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff and Cory Birnberg of Birnberg & Associates appeared on behalf of Defendant. … V.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Godfrey v. Trujillo

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 2025

    Heck v. … Hall v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Rexplore, Inc. Securities Litigation

    685 F. Supp. 1132 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 26, 1988

    In Sherman v. … Seyer, Rexplore’s Chairperson of the Board, and Richard G.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Flexible Plastics Corp. v. Black Mountain Spring Water Inc.

    357 F. Supp. 554 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 1972

    Corp. v. Ajax Hardware Mfg. … Brown & Co., Inc. v. DeBell, 243 F.2d 200 (9th Cir. 1957); E. H. Sheldon & Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • James v. Contra Costa County

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 7, 2023

    Bird v. Dep’t of Hum. … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. of Bryan Cty. 25 v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 26 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Whitelaw v. United States

    9 F.2d 103 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 1925

    In Brown v. Hicks (C. … In Parsons v. Terry, 1 Lowell, 60 , 18 Fed. Cas. 1269 , No. 10,782, cited in Brown v.. Hicks, supra, and there followed, Judge Lowell made a similar decision.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Knowles v. Butz

    358 F. Supp. 228 · District Court, N.D. California · May 16, 1973

    See Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965). … Co. v. Commissioner, 297 U.S. 129, 134 , 56 S.Ct. 397, 400 , 80 L.Ed. 528 (1936). The statutory definition of “household,” 7 U.S.C. § 2012 (e), as modified by Moreno v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Nippon Shosen Kaisha, K.K. v. United States

    238 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 1964

    ). (2) Dumping into the sea. (3) Leave the goods on board without discharging. … Wiggins v. 1100 Tons, More or Less, Of Italian Marble, 186 F.Supp. 452 (E.D.Va. 1960).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Alaska Barite Co. v. Freighters Inc.

    54 F.R.D. 192 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 1972

    See: Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring, 281 F.Supp. 1015 (S.D.Va. 1968); Americana of Puerto Rico Inc. v. Transocean Tankers Corp., 317 F.Supp. 798 (D.C.Puerto Rico 1969); Cateora v. … See: Brown Paper Mill Co. v. Agar Mfg. Corp., 1 F.R.D. 579 (S.D.N.Y.1941). Having said this, the Court is troubled by the grave constitutional issues raised if defendant is denied a jury trial on its counterclaim.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • San Francisco NAACP v. San Francisco Unified School District

    59 F. Supp. 2d 1021 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 2, 1999

    The suit was brought against the SFUSD, its Board Members, and its Superintendent (collectively the “Local Defendants”), and the California State Board of Education, the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the … Board of Educ. of Oklahoma City Pub. Schs. v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237, 248 , 111 S.Ct. 630 , 112 L.Ed.2d 715 (1991).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Lumber Products Ass'n

    42 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 14, 1942

    V. … Heike v. United States, supra; Mason v. United States, supra; O’Connell v. United States, 2 Cir., 40 F.2d 201, 204 .

    Reversed by Ryan v. United States, 128 F.2d 551 (1942)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gylock v. Alaska Packers Ass'n

    82 F. Supp. 127 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 1, 1949

    While the vessel had been docked at the preceding port of Macassar, libelant contracted some sort of venereal ailment for which he sought and received treatment on board ship at the hands 'of the purser. … In Miller v. United States, D.C., 51 F.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Newhall v. United States

    8 F.2d 422 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 23, 1925

    This libel contains two counts, for damage to separate consignments of rubber which were shipped at Singapore on board the steamship Mursa, destined for San Francisco. … A. 214 , and cases cited; Compagnie Maritime Francaise v. Meyer (C. C. A. 9) 248 F. 881, 884 , 160 C. C. A. 639 ; The Willdomino (C. C. A. 3) 300 F. 5 , 1924 A. M. C. 889).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Axis Reinsurance Co. v. Telekenex, Inc.

    913 F. Supp. 2d 793 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 2012

    The district court found that the exclusion applied where a member of Jarvis’s board had transferred $2 million of Jarvis’s endowment funds to a business that the board member owned. Id. … Co. v. Super.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dawson v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

    250 F. Supp. 3d 401 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 2017

    At most, he points to the concurrence in Berger and the decision of a regional director of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). … Id. at 1074 (citing NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85, 102 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lynch v. City & County of San Francisco

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 19, 2022

    Id. at 3; Green v. Baca, 226 F.R.D. 624, 648 (C.D. … Brown.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ocean Industries, Inc. v. Greene

    15 F.2d 862 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 13, 1926

    Smith v. Maryland, 18 How. 71 , 15 L. Ed. 269 . Conception Bay, more than 20 miles wide between promontories, was held to be part of the territory of Newfoundland. Direct U. S. Cable Co. v. Anglo American Tel. Co., L. … Mortensen v. Peters, 14 S. T. L. 227.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hunter Douglas Corp. v. Lando Products, Inc.

    102 F. Supp. 635 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 1, 1952

    The Board of Patent Appeals sustained the rejection of claims covering the apparatus but allowed two claims covering the process. … A patent is presumptively valid but, as stated by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Jacuzzi Bros., Inc., v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Von Brimer v. Whirlpool Corporation

    367 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 1973

    Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co., 26 Cal.2d 412, 437 , 159 P.2d 958, 972 (1945). See also Helfer v. … Board of Pension Com’rs., 18 Cal.2d 427, 431 , 116 P.2d 37, 39 (1941) (city charter required Board action before court proceedings permitted); see also Eistrat v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • The Queen

    184 F. 537 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 10, 1910

    Cooley v. Board of Wardens, etc., 12 How. 299 , 13 L. Ed. 996 . … Olsen v. Smith, 195 U. S. 332 , 25 Sup. Ct. 52, 49 L. Ed. 224 ; Sprague v. Thompson, 118 U. S. 95 , 6 Sup. Ct. 988, 30 L. Ed. 115 ; The Carrie L. Tyler, 106 Fed. 422 , 45 C. C. A. 374 , 54 L. R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.