Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

0.39s

  • Seefahrer

    133 F. 793 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 25, 1904

    The libelants offered no evidence as to the number of pounds of seed actually received on board the Seefahrer, other than the bills of lading. … Co. v. Elder, 101 Fed. 1001 , 42 C. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rush v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

    747 F. Supp. 575 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 1990

    (ii) ... when the association is determined by the [Federal Home Loan Bank] Board to be in an unsafe or unsound condition. … V.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • United States v. Showalter

    103 F. Supp. 806 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 1952

    In United States v. … The 60 days after the decision of the Board becomes final is simply a part of the suspended period and the Commissioner is entitled, in making the assessment of a deficiency determined by the Board, to use the 60-day period

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Loza

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 2020

    Simpson i4 Paul V. … See, generally, Kokkonen v. Guardian 8 || Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 357, 381 (1994); Hagestad v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marc Cohodes v. United States Department of Justice

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 2025

    Rosenfeld v. U.S. DOJ, 904 F. Supp. 2d 988, 1008 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (citing Brown v. 24 Sullivan, 916 F.2d 492, 497 (9th Cir. 1990)). … C 19 || Hensley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lewis v. Contra Costa County

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 2020

    Clegg v. … Comm’rs v. 26 Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Yanish v. Wixon

    81 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 20, 1948

    United States, 3 Cir., 81 F.2d 966 ; Graham v. United States, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 746, 748 . 2 Wong Yan Sung v. Clark, D.C., 80 F. Supp. 235 ; United States ex. rel. … Leo Tack v. Clark, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 26279. 3 Cf. Azzollini v. Watkins, D.C. S.D.N.Y., 81 F.Supp. 127 . 3 (No opinion for publication).

    Reversed on other grounds by Yanish v. Barber, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, 181 F.2d 492 (1950)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Berry v. County of Sonoma

    763 F. Supp. 1055 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 28, 1991

    , members of the Board of Supervisors. … See, e.g., Rousseau v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Mesa Verde Construction Co. v. Northern California District Council of Laborers

    602 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 1985

    The Union concedes that it did not do so, but seeks to escape the consequences by relying on Deiches v. … The Board’s ruling limits the employer’s obligations under the agreement to that site. See Pacific Erectors, Inc., 256 NLRB at 421-422.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Board of Trustees v. SLK, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 2020

    BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS 7 PENSION TRUST FUND, AND ITS Case No. 19-cv-01812-PJH BOARD … Despite bearing “the burden of submitting detailed time records 26 justifying the hours claimed to have been expended,” Chalmers v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Humphreys v. United States

    228 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, N.D. California · May 1, 1964

    Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Union Pac. R. Co., 222 U.S. 541 , 32 S.Ct. 108 , 56 L.Ed. 308 ; Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 292 U.S. 282 , 54 S.Ct. 692 , 78 L.Ed. 1260 ; United States v. … People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co., 211 Cal. 121 , 294 P. 3 ; Butterworth v. Boyd, 12 Cal.2d 140 , 82 P.2d 434 , 126 A.L.R. 838 ; Southern Pacific Company v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brennan v. Matson Navigation Company

    345 F. Supp. 1179 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 19, 1972

    Czaplicki v. The Hoegh Silvercloud, 351 U.S. 525 , 76 S.Ct. 946 , 100 L.Ed. 1387 (1956). The test of laches is prejudice. Gutierrez v. Waterman SS Corp., 373 U.S. 206 , 83 S.Ct. 1185 , 10 L.Ed.2d 297 (1963); Espino v. … “[T]he owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care under the circumstances of each case.” Kermeree v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation

    554 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 2008

    In March 2000, Star disclosed that its Board of Directors changed its Interchange Fees----”). … Leaseways, Inc. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Pacific Homes, Inc. v. United States

    129 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 1955

    This specific issue has been considered by our Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in two cases, Rollingwood Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1951, 190 F.2d 263 ; McGah v. … In McGah v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 210 F.2d 769 , a different situation existed than in the instant case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rabkin v. Dean

    856 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1994

    The board’s authority to fix salaries of all employees was provided in Town Law. … Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 605-06 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 684-85 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins.

    8 F. Supp. 916 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 10, 1934

    Co. v. Ross ( C. C. A.) 30 F.(2d) 80, 83 . … Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Broyer (C. C. A.) 20 F.(2d) 818 ; New York Life Insurance Company v. Brown (C. C. A.) 39 F.(2d) 376 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Matson Navigation Co.

    383 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 25, 1974

    New York Board of Trade v. Director General, 59 I.C.C. 205 , 209 (1920). Detention of Motor Vehicles — Middle Atl. & New England, 318 I.C.C. 593 , 607 (1962). See Southern Railway System v. … New York Board of Trade v. Director-General, supra, 59 I.C.C. at 209. Detention of Motor Vehicles-Middle Atl. & New England, supra, 318 I.C.C. at 607.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Stringer v. Cruz

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 12, 2019

    See West v. … Eleventh Amendment immunity 1 See Brown vy. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Edd King v. National General Insurance Company

    District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2025

    Ellis v. … Wang v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Uberti v. Gorin

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 23, 2021

    Uberti v. … Columbia v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.