Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
0.39s
133 F. 793 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 25, 1904
The libelants offered no evidence as to the number of pounds of seed actually received on board the Seefahrer, other than the bills of lading. … Co. v. Elder, 101 Fed. 1001 , 42 C. C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRush v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
747 F. Supp. 575 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 4, 1990
(ii) ... when the association is determined by the [Federal Home Loan Bank] Board to be in an unsafe or unsound condition. … V.
Cited 14 timesPublished103 F. Supp. 806 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 1952
In United States v. … The 60 days after the decision of the Board becomes final is simply a part of the suspended period and the Commissioner is entitled, in making the assessment of a deficiency determined by the Board, to use the 60-day period
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Loza
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 2020
Simpson i4 Paul V. … See, generally, Kokkonen v. Guardian 8 || Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 357, 381 (1994); Hagestad v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMarc Cohodes v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 2025
Rosenfeld v. U.S. DOJ, 904 F. Supp. 2d 988, 1008 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (citing Brown v. 24 Sullivan, 916 F.2d 492, 497 (9th Cir. 1990)). … C 19 || Hensley v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 2020
Clegg v. … Comm’rs v. 26 Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691.
Cited 0 timesUnknown81 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 20, 1948
United States, 3 Cir., 81 F.2d 966 ; Graham v. United States, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 746, 748 . 2 Wong Yan Sung v. Clark, D.C., 80 F. Supp. 235 ; United States ex. rel. … Leo Tack v. Clark, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 26279. 3 Cf. Azzollini v. Watkins, D.C. S.D.N.Y., 81 F.Supp. 127 . 3 (No opinion for publication).
Reversed on other grounds by Yanish v. Barber, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, 181 F.2d 492 (1950)Cited 10 timesPublished763 F. Supp. 1055 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 28, 1991
, members of the Board of Supervisors. … See, e.g., Rousseau v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedMesa Verde Construction Co. v. Northern California District Council of Laborers
602 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 1985
The Union concedes that it did not do so, but seeks to escape the consequences by relying on Deiches v. … The Board’s ruling limits the employer’s obligations under the agreement to that site. See Pacific Erectors, Inc., 256 NLRB at 421-422.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Board of Trustees v. SLK, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 2020
BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS 7 PENSION TRUST FUND, AND ITS Case No. 19-cv-01812-PJH BOARD … Despite bearing “the burden of submitting detailed time records 26 justifying the hours claimed to have been expended,” Chalmers v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown228 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, N.D. California · May 1, 1964
Interstate Commerce Comm. v. Union Pac. R. Co., 222 U.S. 541 , 32 S.Ct. 108 , 56 L.Ed. 308 ; Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 292 U.S. 282 , 54 S.Ct. 692 , 78 L.Ed. 1260 ; United States v. … People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co., 211 Cal. 121 , 294 P. 3 ; Butterworth v. Boyd, 12 Cal.2d 140 , 82 P.2d 434 , 126 A.L.R. 838 ; Southern Pacific Company v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrennan v. Matson Navigation Company
345 F. Supp. 1179 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 19, 1972
Czaplicki v. The Hoegh Silvercloud, 351 U.S. 525 , 76 S.Ct. 946 , 100 L.Ed. 1387 (1956). The test of laches is prejudice. Gutierrez v. Waterman SS Corp., 373 U.S. 206 , 83 S.Ct. 1185 , 10 L.Ed.2d 297 (1963); Espino v. … “[T]he owner of a ship in navigable waters owes to all who are on board for purposes not inimical to his legitimate interests the duty of exercising reasonable care under the circumstances of each case.” Kermeree v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn Re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation
554 F. Supp. 2d 1003 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 2008
In March 2000, Star disclosed that its Board of Directors changed its Interchange Fees----”). … Leaseways, Inc. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedPacific Homes, Inc. v. United States
129 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 1955
This specific issue has been considered by our Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in two cases, Rollingwood Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1951, 190 F.2d 263 ; McGah v. … In McGah v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 210 F.2d 769 , a different situation existed than in the instant case.
Cited 1 timesPublished856 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1994
The board’s authority to fix salaries of all employees was provided in Town Law. … Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 605-06 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 684-85 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967).
Cited 23 timesPublishedWells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins.
8 F. Supp. 916 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 10, 1934
Co. v. Ross ( C. C. A.) 30 F.(2d) 80, 83 . … Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Broyer (C. C. A.) 20 F.(2d) 818 ; New York Life Insurance Company v. Brown (C. C. A.) 39 F.(2d) 376 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedSouthern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Matson Navigation Co.
383 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 25, 1974
New York Board of Trade v. Director General, 59 I.C.C. 205 , 209 (1920). Detention of Motor Vehicles — Middle Atl. & New England, 318 I.C.C. 593 , 607 (1962). See Southern Railway System v. … New York Board of Trade v. Director-General, supra, 59 I.C.C. at 209. Detention of Motor Vehicles-Middle Atl. & New England, supra, 318 I.C.C. at 607.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 12, 2019
See West v. … Eleventh Amendment immunity 1 See Brown vy. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEdd King v. National General Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2025
Ellis v. … Wang v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Apr 23, 2021
Uberti v. … Columbia v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna