Opinion

Board of Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Loza

Court
District Court, N.D. California
Filed
Jul 29, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.7%

The opinion

1 || Ronald L. Richman (SBN 139189)

Sarah Bowen (SBN 308633)

2 || BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600

3 || San Francisco, CA 94104-4146

Telephone: 415.352.2700

4 || Facsimile: 415.352.2701

E-mail:ron.richman@pbullivant.com

5 sarah.bowen@bullivant.com

6 || Attorneys for Plaintiffs

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 OAKLAND DIVISION

11

12 || BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Case No.: 4:17-cv-06474-HSG

LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE

13 |} TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

14 || THE LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION;

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; BOARD ORDER THEREON

15 || OF TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS

VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST FUND FOR

16 || NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and BOARD OF

TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS TRAINING

17 || AND RETRAINING TRUST FUND FOR

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA,

18

Plaintiffs,

19

VS.

20

JUAN MANUEL LOZA, an individual doing

21 || business as LOZA & SONS

CONSTRUCTION,

22

Defendant.

23

24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and

25 || Defendant Juan Manuel Loza, an individual doing business as Loza & Sons Construction, on the

26 || other hand, through their respective counsel, that pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and

27 || Release (“Agreement”), which is expressly incorporated by reference into this Stipulation for

28 || Dismissal Without Prejudice and Retention of Jurisdiction, that this Court dismiss this action,

4828-6491-1555.1 29512/00267 -l-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION; ORDER

THEREON

1 || without prejudice, and retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the Agreement should any

2 || action be required to enforce the Agreement after the dismissal without prejudice is entered by

3 || the Court.

4 }| DATED: July 27, 2020

5 BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

7 By _/s/ Ronald L. Richman

Ronald L. Richman

8 Sarah Bowen

9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

10 || DATED: July 27, 2020

i SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI PC

12

13 By _/s/ Paul V. Simpson

i4 Paul V. Simpson

Sean Broderick

15 Attorneys for Defendant

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4828-6491-1555,1 29512/00267 -2-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT ey □□□ RETENTION OF JURISDICTION; ORDER

1 ORDER

2 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation and Agreement, which terms and conditions are fully

3 || incorporated herein by this reference, and good cause appearing:

4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed, without prejudice.

> IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall expressly retain jurisdiction over this

6 || matter to enforce the Agreement should any action be required to enforce the Agreement after

7 || the dismissal without prejudice is entered by the Court. See, generally, Kokkonen v. Guardian

8 || Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 357, 381 (1994); Hagestad v. Tragesser, 49 F.3d 1430, 1432

9 |] (9 Cir. 1995).

10 |} DATED: _7/29/2020

12 HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. □

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4828-649 1-1555.1 29512/00267 -3-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT ee AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION; ORDER

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.