Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
0.41s
Schaeffer v. Gregory Village Partners, L.P.
105 F. Supp. 3d 951 · District Court, N.D. California · May 14, 2015
A, B; Brown Depo. 160:21-■162:7 & Ex. 39. Gregory Village has not undertaken the remediation the Regional Board ordered on November 19, 2014. Haber Deck, ¶ 29. … See Brown. Depo., Ex. 33 at 2 (Regional Board Fact Sheet stating that Plaintiffs’ home was one of two sampled in, the neighborhood that had indoor-air PCE levels above ESLs).
Cited 5 timesPublishedNational Railroad Passenger Corp. v. State Board of Equalization
652 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 1986
Art. 1, § 8 cl. 3; State Board of Insurance v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 370 U.S. 451, 456 , 82 S.Ct. 1380, 1383 , 8 L.Ed.2d 620 (1962); Arizona Public Service Co. v. … Trailer Train v. State Board of Equalization, 697 F.2d at 865 citing Philbrook v. Glodgett, 421 U.S. 707, 713-14 , 95 S.Ct. 1893, 1898-99 , 44 L.Ed.2d 525 (1974).
Cited 3 timesPublished338 F. Supp. 780 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 1, 1972
In United States v. … In United States v. Brown, supra, for example, two members of the Ninth Circuit panel, Hamley and Ferguson, JJ., found prejudice and reversed the district judge, Zirpoli, who had found none.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 19, 2025
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. 8 Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Shores Props., LLC v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board
540 F. Supp. 1374 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 1982
Horton v. … See generally Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 526 F.Supp. 343 (N.D.Ohio 1981).
Reversed on other grounds by Fidelity Savings And Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 689 F.2d 803 (1982)Cited 15 timesPublished323 F. Supp. 661 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 8, 1969
In August, 1969 the Army Board for Correction of Military Records denied Browning’s application for correction of his Army records. Petitioner’s six-year period of enlistment expired in May, 1969. … See United States v. Seeger, supra; United States v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedInternational Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Pay Board
55 F.R.D. 5 · District Court, N.D. California · May 3, 1972
The advice rendered by the defendant Board’s employee was not final action of the Board, nor in fact any action of the Board at all. … See, International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, Local 37 v. Boyd, 347 U.S. 222 , 74 S.Ct. 447 , 98 L.Ed. 650 (1954); United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell, 330 U.
Cited 0 timesPublished25 F. Cas. 809 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 13, 1862
This paper was signed by Josefa De Haro, the widow, Ro-salia Brown, (by her husband, C. Brown,) Prudencia De Haro, and Candelavia and Carlota De Haro. … In the exercise of the trust thus confided to him, De Saldo employed counsel to present the case to the board, and at their suggestion the survey was made, and the land designated by Brown and Denniston, who had married the
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Pacifica, LLC v. City of Pacifica
274 F. Supp. 2d 1118 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 30, 2003
Kaufman v. Board of Trustees, 168 F.R.D. 278, 280 (C.D.Cal.1996). The Brown Act is not a privilege recognized under federal law. See id. at 280 . … See, e.g., Newport Pacific, Inc. v. County of San Diego, 200 F.R.D. 628 (S.D.Cal.2001) (discussing privilege with respect to depositions of legislative aides to county board); Artfield Builders, Inc. v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 7, 2023
Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corrs., 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009) (California 4 Department of Corrections and California Board of Prison Terms entitled to Eleventh Amendment 5 immunity). … Blatchford, 38 F.3d 1505, 1512 (9th Cir. 1994), overruled on other grounds 26 by Board of Trustees of Glazing Health and Welfare Trust v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jan 12, 2024
Ashcroft v. … Albino v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 4, 2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHASOM BROWN … Motions under 24 Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) for improper use of challenges must be made in a 25 timely fashion.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 2023
Brown v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., No. 17-cv-1285 AWI EPG (E.D. Cal.). … Brown v. CDCR, No. 20-1197 AWI EPG.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGallant v. Board of Trustees of California State University
997 F. Supp. 1231 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 27, 1998
Id., Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 120 F.3d 1390, 1418 (11th Cir.1997). 3 The conduct must be judged from both a subjective and an objective perspective. I find that Dr. … Heyne v. Caruso, 69 F.3d 1475, 1478 (9th Cir.1995).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 2023
Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 17 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communs., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 18 (1978)). … Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 28, 2024
the vessel despite the ship board rule 11 prohibiting it. … And in Hasty v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 2023
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 CHASOM BROWN … Luce v. United States, 27 469 U.S. 38, 40 n.2 (1984).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2022
See Bonilla v. Ayers, Case No. 08-0471 1 YGR. Plaintiff is also represented by counsel in state court habeas proceedings. … Moreover, even if an 14 IFP application were granted, his lawsuits would be barred under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 15 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994), Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43-54 (1971), Demos v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 2022
Nov. 9, 2020); Hologram USA, Inc. v. Pulse Evolution Corp., No. 19 2:14-v-00772-GMN-NJK, 2016 WL 3654285 (D. Nev. July 5, 2016); Luna Gaming-San Diego, 20 LLC v. … (citing SEC v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jun 21, 2022
Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 17 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communs., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 18 (1978)). … Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna