Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

0.74s

  • Hegarty v. AT & T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1

    109 F. Supp. 3d 1250 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 11, 2015

    Rater, M.D., Board Certified in Psychiatry, Member of American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology; (3) Charles Brock, M.D., Board Certified Neurology, Board Certified Pain Management, Assistant Professor of Neurology at the … As the court noted in Ortega v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • County of Josephine v. Watt

    539 F. Supp. 696 · District Court, N.D. California · May 28, 1982

    Brown, Jr., requested the then Secretary of the Interior, Honorable Cecil D. … In Warm Springs Dam Task Force v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Toney v. Reagan

    326 F. Supp. 1093 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 28, 1971

    Drown v. Portsmouth School Dist., supra; see also, Roth v. Board of Regents, 310 F.Supp. 972, 980 (W.D.Wis.1970). … Sindermann v. Perry, supra, Roth v. Board of Regents, 310 F.Supp. 972 (W.D.Wis.1970).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Mercoza

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 10, 2024

    DIRECTV, Inc. v. … Cripps v. Life Ins. Co. of N.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Wright

    51 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 10, 1942

    Anderson v. Corall, 263 U.S. 193, 196 , 44 S.Ct. 43, 44 , 68 L.Ed. 247 . … Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 , 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ong v. Cleland

    492 F. Supp. 51 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 1979

    Brown v. G. S. A., 425 U. S. 820, 828-9 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1966 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Scott v. Perry, 569 F.2d 1064, 1065 (9th Circuit, 1978); Torres v. Claytor, 18 EPD 5893 (1978). *53 II. … Jordan v. United States, 522 F.2d 1128 (8th Cir. 1975); Ettinger v. Johnson, 518 F.2d 648 (3rd Cir. 1975); League of United Latin American Citizens v. Hampton, 501 F.2d 843 (D.C.Cir.1974); Place v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Conservation Force v. Salazar

    677 F. Supp. 2d 1203 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 2009

    Browne v. Gossett, 259 Fed.Appx. 928 (9th Cir. 2007). … Brewster v. Board of Educ. of Lynwood Unified School Dist., 149 F.3d 971 , 983 (9th Cir.1998).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Spring Valley Water Co. v. City of San Francisco

    252 F. 979 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 13, 1918

    Kimberly v. Arms, 129 U. S. 512 , 9 Sup. Ct. 355, 32 L. Ed. 764 , Davis v. Schwartz, 155 U. S. 636 , 15 Sup. Ct. 237, 39 L. Ed. 289 , and kindred cases are cited in support of this proposition. … Co. v. Tompkins, 176 U. S. 167, 180 , 20 Sup. Ct. 336, 341 ( 44 L.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Peterson v. Wells Fargo Bank

    556 F. Supp. 1100 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 1981

    Fisher v. … See Seibert v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • TK Power, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.

    433 F. Supp. 2d 1058 · District Court, N.D. California · May 18, 2006

    than residing off-board in a cart barn. … Hudson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Accellion, Inc. Data Breach Litigation

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2022

    Accellion, Inc., No. 4:21-cv-09615-YGR (“Ace American”) to 15 Brown v. Accellion, Inc., No. 5:21-cv-01155-EJD (“Brown”), which is pending before the 16 undersigned. … See Asus Computer Int'l v. Interdigital, Inc., 2015 WL 13783764 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Swagelok

    364 F. Supp. 3d 1061 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 30, 2019

    Co. v. Brown & Bryant, Inc. , 159 F.3d 358 , 362-64 (9th Cir. 1997) ; see also Ray v. Alad Corp. , 19 Cal.3d 22 , 28, 136 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 560 P.2d 3 (Cal. 1977) (applying similar analysis under California law). … Brokers v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Justus v. Zimny

    250 F. Supp. 719 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 16, 1965

    Defendants point out that the plaintiff is free to present his case, following his discharge, before a review board ( 10 U.S.C., Sec. 1553 ), and the Board for the Correction of Naval Records ( 10 U.S.C., Sec. 1552 ). … The problem presented by this case may be distinguished from the situation in Unglesby v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • First Resort, Inc. v. Herrera

    80 F. Supp. 3d 1043 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 20, 2015

    ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Dkt. 84, 86 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge Plaintiff First Resort, Inc. … As Defendants, First Resort has named the City and County of San Francisco, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors (“Board”) and the San Francisco City Attorney (collectively “the City”).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • The Bullis-Purissima Elementary School v. Santa Clara County Board of Education, et al.

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 2026

    On November 15, 2024, BCS’s board approved a version of the MOU suggested by SCCOE 2 staff. Id. ¶ 32. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    313 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, N.D. California · May 27, 1970

    The Court is asked to review the decision of the Board. … In so doing, he subscribed to the interpretation given to the Act by the Court in Quintana v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Surgeon v. Alaska Packers Ass'n

    26 F. Supp. 241 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 21, 1939

    Alaska Packers Association v. … Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, 1922, 257 U.S. 469, 478 , 42 S.Ct. 157 , 66 L.Ed. 321 , 25 A.L.R. 1008 ; Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters v. Braud, 1926, 270 U.S. 59, 64 , 46 S.Ct. 194 , 70 L.Ed. 470 ; Fuentes v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pacific Employers Ins. v. Pillsbury

    39 F. Supp. 673 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 1941

    It is true that he ate and slept on board the S. S. … The Court is aware of the recent ruling in Cantey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Application of Atchley

    169 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 27, 1958

    As to those allegations considered by the State Courts, petitioner has met the jurisdictional requirements of this Court ( 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 ; Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; and Darr v. … It may be noted here that were the question properly presented to this Court, it would adopt that finding of the referee (Brown v. Allen, supra).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • BURROUGHS OBO OPERATING ENG'RS LOC. U. v. Marr

    559 F. Supp. 141 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 8, 1982

    Dinko v. Wall, 531 F.2d 68 (2d Cir.1976); Campton v. Johnson, 95 LRRM 2788 (N.D.Cal.1977). … See, e.g., Holdeman v. Sheldon, 311 F.2d 2 (2d Cir.1962); Tucker v. Shaw, 378 F.2d 304 (2d Cir.1967).

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.