Case law

Cunning v. Carr

69 Cal. App. 230 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1924

Practically the same holding is had in Humiston v. Shaffer, 145 Cal. 195 [ 78 Pac. 951 ], Victors v. Kelsey, 31 Cal. App. 796 [ 161 Pac. 1006 ], County of Yolo v. Joyce, 156 Cal. 429 [ 105 Pac. 125 ], and Rocca v. … In the case of Ford v.

Citizens' Securities Co. v. Hammel

14 Cal. App. 564 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1910

It goes without saying that a landlord, having no lien for rent reserved or for the value of the use and occupation of property (Hitchcock v. … In Thornburgh v.

County of Orange v. BARRATT AMERICAN, INC.

58 Cal. Rptr. 3d 542 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 2007

(Carlton Browne & Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 35, 40 [ 258 Cal.Rptr. 118 ].) … (Hicks v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 228, 235 [ 138 Cal.Rptr. 101 ].) But the power to adopt a budgeted expenditure does not insulate the County from judicial attack.

Jahr v. Casebeer

83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 172 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1999

(Voters for Responsible Retirement v. Board of Supervisors (1994) 8 Cal.4th 765, 772 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 814 , 884 P.2d 645 ].) … (Voters for Responsible Retirement v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 8 Cal.4th at p. 772 .)

American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers v. Superior Court

207 Cal. App. 2d 676 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1962

In Noland v. … In Gibson v.

People v. Bloom

270 Cal. App. 2d 731 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1969

Two packages of cigarette papers and a book of matches were found in the brown paper bag, as well as marijuana seeds at the bottom of the valise. … People v. Cowman (1963) 223 Cal.App.2d 109, 117 [ 35 Cal.Rptr. 528 ]. In the leading case of People v.

Alford v. Department of Education

13 Cal. App. 3d 884 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1970

That evidence satisfies the tests of Education Code sections 13129 and 13202. *889 Relying principally upon Morrison, v. … (Housman v. Board of Medical Examiners, 84 Cal.App.2d 308, 313 [ 190 P.2d 653 , 192 P.2d 45 ].)

Bedard v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 2024

(Rand v. Board of Psychology (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 565, 575 (Rand).) … In Barber v.

Leach Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

228 Cal. App. 2d 634 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1964

In effect it is a review of the action of the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County sitting as a hoard of equalization. (Const., art. XIII, § 9; Southern Pacific Land *637 Co. v. … Meyer v.

Heinlein v. Anaheim Union High School District

96 Cal. App. 2d 19 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1950

Board of Trustees, 18 Cal.2d 586 [ 116 P.2d 593 ] ; Fry v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.2d 753 [ 112 P.2d 229 ]; Abraham v. Sims, 2 Cal.2d 698 [ 42 P.2d 1029 ] and Fidler v. … (Fidler v. Board of Trustees, supra; Abraham v. Sims, supra; Butterworth v. Boyd, 12 Cal.2d 140, 152 [ 82 P.2d 434 , 126 A.L.R. 838 ] ; Kacsur v. Board of Trustees, supra, p. 591.)

Bekins v. S. Co. v. State of California

135 Cal. App. 738 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 1933

(Marin Municipal Water Dist. v. North Coast Water Co., 178 Cal. 324 [ 173 Pac. 473 ]; 7 Cal. Jur. 597, sec. 17; 7 R. C. … Proc.; Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc., 125 Cal. App. 489 [ 13 Pac. (2d) 972 ]; 2 Cal. Jur., p. 155, sec. 26.)

Kalina v. San Mateo Community College District

132 Cal. App. 3d 48 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1982

(See Covino v. Governing Board, supra, 76 Cal.App.3d 314, 322.) … Dist. (1978) 79 Cal.App.3d 556, 559 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 100 ]; American Federation of Teachers v. Board of Education (1977) 77 Cal.App.3d 100, 106-107 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 264 ]; Paulus v.

Drescher v. Superior Court

218 Cal. App. 3d 1140 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1990

(Brown v. Wolff (9th Cir. 1983) 706 F.2d 902 , 907: see also United States v. Black (9th Cir. 1979) 609 F.2d 1330, 1334 .)” (People v. Sampson, supra, 191 Cal.App.3d 1409, 1416 .) In Brown v. … (Brown v. Wolff, supra, 706 F.2d at p. 905 .) 3 *1148 We are concerned with a different standard.

Reclamation District No. 108 v. Ash

58 Cal. App. 238 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 1922

(Robinson v. Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County, 16 Cal. 208 ; Imperial Water Co. v. Board of Supervisors etc., 162 Cal. 14 [ 120 Pac. 780 ]; Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Eshleman, 166 Cal. 640 [Ann. … Dist., 188 Cal. 451 , 205 Pac. 688 ; City Council of City and County of Denver v. Board of Commrs. of Adams Co., 33 Colo. 1 [ 77 Pac. 858 , 860]; People v. Ames, 24 Colo. 422 [ 51 Pac. 426 ]; Ames v.

Estate of McCarthy

5 Cal. App. 3d 158 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1970

McCarthy “dominated and controlled the board of directors,” and said directors conducted the affairs of the corporation pursuant to his instructions. … As said in Lewis v.

People v. Bozigian

270 Cal. App. 2d 373 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 1969

(People v. Smith, 223 Cal.App.2d 388, 393 [ 35 Cal.Rptr. 731 ]; People v. Daniels, 223 Cal.App.2d 441, 443 [ 35 Cal.Rptr. 890 ]; People v. Wiest, 205 Cal.App.2d 43, 45-46 [ 22 Cal.Rptr. 846 ]; People v. … (People v.

In Re Goddard

24 Cal. App. 2d 132 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1937

(Hale v. Mc *139 Gettigan, 114 Cal. 112, at 117 [ 45 Pac. 1049 ].) (See, also, Lucchesi v. State Board of Equalization, 137 Cal. App. 478, 482 [ 31 Pac. (2d) 800 ].) … As stated in City of Eureka v.

Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund v. Workers Comp. App. Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 2024

(Arriaga v. … (See Angell v.

County of Sacramento v. Loeb

160 Cal. App. 3d 446 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1984

The State Board of Control is an administrative board exercising quasi-judicial powers. (Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of California (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 77, 97 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 524 ].) … (Dufton v. Daniels (1923) 190 Cal. 577, 581 [ 213 P. 949 ]; see also Hurtado v. Superior Court, supra, 11 Cal.3d at p. 579 .) In such circumstances, mandate is appropriate to control an abuse of the board’s discretion.

Fleice v. Chualar Union Elementary School District

206 Cal. App. 3d 886 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1988

(Turner v. Board of Trustees, supra, 16 Cal.3d 818, 825 , italics added.) … (Grimsley v. Board of Trustees (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 1440, 1449-1452 [ 235 Cal.Rptr. 85 ].) 3 Education Code section 44882 was repealed in 1987.