Case law

Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Ross

32 Cal. App. 2d 455 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1939

Co. v. Brown, 44 Cal. App. 371, 374 [ 186 Pac. 386, 388 ], (1919) it was related: “This leaves for our consideration the question of the personal responsibility of the defendant. … The only point made by the appellant in its attack upon this portion of the judgment is that because the defendant had notice at the time of the contract with Alex Brown for the sale of the premises that the said Alex Brown

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

219 Cal. App. 3d 715 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1990

(Carlson v. Assessment Appeals Bd. … (De nnis v.

Gaderer v. Grossmont Union High School District

124 Cal. App. 686 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 12, 1932

THOMPSON (V. N.), J., pro tem. … If the plaintiff and *690 appellant did not testify before the school board it must necessarily follow also that the board did not have before it evidence upon this charge at the time of the hearing.

Gipner v. State Civil Service Commission

13 Cal. App. 2d 100 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 4, 1936

In the ease of Anderson v. Board of Medical Examiners, 117 Cal. … Jur. 1063; Suckow v. Alderson, 182 Cal. 247 [ 187 Pac. 965 ]; Dyment v. Board of Medical Examiners, 57 Cal. App. 260 [ 207 Pac. 409, 411 ].)

People v. Bates

222 Cal. App. 4th 60 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 2013

Instead, this factor is met “when officers unlawfully seize a defendant ‘in the hope that something might turn up.’ ” (United States v. Williams (6th Cir. 2010) 615 F.3d 657, 670, quoting Brown v. … v.

In re Scott

California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 2020

(See Descamps v. United States (2013) 570 U.S. 254 (Descamps); Mathis v. United States (2016) __ U.S. __, [136 S.Ct. 2243] (Mathis).) … (Brown, supra, 45 Cal.App.5th at p. 717.)

Kennedy v. Ramirez CA1/5

California Court of Appeal · Sep 10, 2020

(See Kennedy v. Superior Court (2019) 36 Cal.App.5th 306, 310 (Kennedy); Pating v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 608, 617.) … (Brown v. Smith (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 1135, 1139 (Brown).) The statute retains a medical exemption.

Arroyo v. Pacific Ridge Neighborhood Homeowners Assn.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 2025

(Fourth La Costa Condominium Owners Assn. v. Seith (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 563, 571; Asaro v. … (Friars Village Homeowners Assn. v. Hansing (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 405, 411-412; see also Lake Lindero Homeowners Association, Inc. v.

Gamer v. duPont Glore Forgan, Inc.

65 Cal. App. 3d 280 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1976

. & Co. v. Turner, 277 F. 680 ; Wilhite v. Houston, 200 F. 390 ; Berry v. Chase, 146 F. 625 ; Lehman v. Feld, 37 F. 852 ; Gordon v. Andrews, 222 Mo.App. 609 [ 2 S.W.2d 809 ]; Claiborne Commission Co. v. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Cologne, J., concurred.

L & S Framing Inc. v. Cal. Occupational Saf. & Health Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 2023

We note California courts routinely cite Appeals Board decisions. (See, e.g., Elsner v. Uveges (2004) 34 Cal.4th 915, 930; Rick’s Electric, Inc. v. … (See Alcala v.

People v. Smith

17 Cal. App. 3d 604 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1971

(People v. Mosher (1969) 1 Cal.3d 379, 394 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 379 , 461 P.2d 659 ].) … In this court, the People rely on Morel v. Superior Court (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 913 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 297 ], and on People v.

Trim, Inc. v. County of Monterey

86 Cal. App. 3d 539 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1978

In Knoff v. … (See Lilli Ann Corp. v.

Cal. Teachers Ass'n v. Bd. of Trs. of Fullerton Union High Sch. Dist.

82 Cal. App. 3d 249 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1978

Appellants’ reliance on Board of Trustees v. Cory (1978) 79 Cal.App.3d 661 [ 145 Cal.Rptr. 136 ] is misplaced. … (Id., at p. 666; see also Veterans’ Welfare Board v. Riley (1922) 189 Cal. 159 [ 208 P. 678 , 22 A.L.R. 1531 ].)

Mulder v. City of Los Angeles

110 Cal. App. 663 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1930

Generally, on the subject of municipal liability for damages in actions of this character, we refer to the opinion of this court in Dick v. City of Los Angeles, 34 Cal. App. 724 [ 168 Pac. 703 ]. … (Civic Center Assn. v. Railroad Com., 175 Cal. 441, 445 [ 166 Pac. 351 ].) "Whether the city could by charter thus exempt itself from liability for negligence, we are not now called upon to determine.

Palmanteer v. Foremost Life Ins. Co.

82 Cal. App. 3d 341 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1978

(See Klepper v. Standard Life Ins. Co. (1976) 60 Cal.App.3d 470 [ 131 Cal.Rptr. 519 ].) … ; and, the second being the actual financing itself from the Bank of Alex Brown . . . .”

Rosenberg v. Bullard

2 Cal. App. 2d 118 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1934

(Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 [ 147 Pac. 1168 ].) Determinative of the question here presented, namely, the jurisdiction of the trial court to proceed pending the appeal, is the ease of People v. … Upon the authority, therefore, of the case of People v. Sonoqui, supra, the judgment heretofore entered in the instant case must be reversed. It is so ordered. Plummer, J., and Thompson, J., concurred.

Madison v. City & County of San Francisco

106 Cal. App. 2d 232 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1951

Board of Regents, 66 Cal.App. 693 , at page 701 [ 227 P. 243 ]. In People v. … Beard v.

People v. Hurst

183 Cal. App. 2d 379 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1960

Hanks searched the car and under the dashboard on the driver’s side found one brown paper cigarette. … (People v. Merino, 151 Cal.App.2d 594, 597 [ 312 P.2d 48 ].) Preceding the arrest, Hanks, standing outside the house, saw through the vent hole a large brown package under the house.

People v. Rissman

143 Cal. App. 2d 488 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1956

Such practice was approved in People v. Adams, 137 Cal.App.2d 660 [ 290 P.2d 944 ] ; People v. Chamberlain, 96 Cal.App.2d 178 [ 214 P.2d 600 ] ; People v. Sears, 124 Cal.App.2d 839, 853 [ 269 P.2d 683 ].) … (People v. Nathanson, 134 Cal.App.2d 43, 45 [ 284 P.2d 975 ] ; McFarland v. Superior Court, 88 Cal.App.2d 153, 158-159 [ 198 P.2d 318 ].)

People v. Holguin

145 Cal. App. 2d 520 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1956

It is true, as stated in Badillo v. … As was said in People v.