Case law

In re Ricardo P. CA2/7

California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 2014

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Kevin Brown, Judge. Vacated and remanded with directions. Esther R. … (See People v. Farell (2002) 28 Cal.4th 381, 384, fn. 2 [record of court’s oral pronouncement controls over clerk’s minute order]; People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185.)

Kleist v. City of Glendale

56 Cal. App. 3d 770 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1976

(Board) to carry them out. … (People v. Paramount Citrus Assn. (1957) 147 Cal.App.2d 399, 407-408 [ 305 P.2d 135 ].) It cannot carry that burden by inviting the reviewing court to search the record for support of its position. (People v.

Anderson v. Lum Show

124 Cal. App. 490 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1932

Brown was a guest therein. The Anderson automobile was preceded by an automobile operated by defendant August Pausback. … (Litherbury v. Kimmet, 183 Cal. 24 [ 195 Pac. 660 ]; Snyder v. Reeg, 86 Cal. App. 231 [ 260 Pac. 600 ].)

Snyder v. City of Alameda

58 Cal. App. 2d 517 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1943

Pension Board, 75 Cal.App. 335 [ 242 P. 756 ] ; O’Dea v. … Peck, 36 Cal.App. 4 [ 171 P. 115 ]; Goldsmith v. Board of Education, 66 Cal.App. 157 [ 225 P. 783 ]; Aggele r v. Dominguez, 217 Cal. 429 [ 19 P.2d 241 ]; Reuter v. Board of Supervisors, 220 Cal. 314 [ 30 P.2d 417 ].)

Williamson v. Payne

25 Cal. App. 2d 497 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1938

As an example of some of the rules that have been upheld we may cite the following: In Rees v. … The same ruling was had in'the case of Pardee v. Schuykill County et al., 276 Pa. 246 [ 120 Atl. 139 ]. We have heretofore referred to section 4041.1, supra, as to the powers of the board of supervisors to make rules.

Shewbridge v. Police Commission

64 Cal. App. 2d 787 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1944

Co. v. San Francisco, 14 Cal.2d 516, 521 [ 95 P.2d 138 ]; Ludolph v. Board of Police Commrs., 30 Cal.App.2d 211, 217 [ 86 P.2d 118 ]; Christal v. Police Commission, 33 Cal.App.2d 564, 572 [ 92 P.2d 416 ].) … (Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., 100 Cal.App. 270 [ 279 P. 1080 ]; Sevina v. Hickok, 113 Cal.App. 301 [ 298 P. 116 ] ; McColgan v. Board of Police Commrs., 130 Cal.App. 66 [ 19 P.2d 815 ].)”

Morales v. Ingels

30 Cal. App. 2d 182 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1938

(Meyer v. San Francisco, 150 Cal. 131 [ 88 Pac. 722 , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 110] ; San Diego Cotton Club v. State Board of Equalization, 139 Cal. … (Kelley v. Kingsbury, 210 Cal. 37 [ 290 Pac. 885 ]; Doble Steam Motor Gorp. v. Daugherty, 195 Cal. 158 [ 232 Pac. 140 ].) The judgment of the trial court is reversed. Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Ivory Education Institute v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife

California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 2018

Brown v. iMergent, Inc. (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 333, 339–340, quoting Schweitzer v. Westminster Investment (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1195, 1206.) … (Ibid. quoting Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180.)

Sacramento Typographical U. No. 46 v. St. of Calif

18 Cal. App. 3d 634 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1971

(Meyer v. Board of Trustees (1961) 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 431 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].) Defendant’s contention fails. … Board of Admin., etc. (1939) 34 Cal.App.2d 514, 521-522 [ 93 P.2d 1046 , 94 P.2d 610 ]; see also, Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v.

Nelson v. County of Los Angeles

163 Cal. App. 2d 607 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1958

Both parties rely upon Slochower v. Board of Higher Education of N. Y. City, supra, 350 U.S. 551 , and Board of Education v. Mass, supra, 47 Cal.2d 494 . … A like holding is found in the case of Board of Education v.

In Re Vasquez

170 Cal. App. 4th 370 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 2009

The Governor’s decision to reverse a grant of parole by the Board is governed by the same factors that guide the Board’s decision (Cal. Const, art. V, § 8, subd. … The Governor’s constitutional authority is limited to a review of the evidence presented to the Board. (Cal. Const., art. V, § 8, subd.

Niceley v. County of Madera

111 Cal. App. 731 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 13, 1931

of Yolo v. … Practically the same holding is had in Humiston v. Shaffer, 145 Cal. 195 [ 78 Pac. 651 ] ; Victors v. Kelsey, 31 Cal. App. 796 [ 161 Pac. 1006 ] ; County of Yolo v. Joyce, 156 Cal. 429 [ 105 Pac. 125 ]; Rocca v.

People v. Experian Data Corp.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 2024

Brown for Plaintiff and Appellant. Jones Day, Nathaniel P. Garrett, Richard J. Grabowski, John A. Vogt and Ryan D. Ball, for Defendant and Respondent. … (See, e.g., Jolly v.

Hassaine v. Club Demonstration Services

California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2022

(See Mackey v. Board of Trustees of Cal. … (Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021) 11 Cal.5th 204, 213 (Brown).) Because the trial court granted summary judgment on the basis of no duty, it did not reach CDS’s alternative arguments regarding breach and causation.

Woo Chul Lee v. Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile Club

50 Cal. App. 4th 694 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1996

Gaillard v. … Mitchell v.

City of Chula Vista v. County of San Diego

23 Cal. App. 4th 1713 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1994

(Long Beach Equities, Inc. v. County of Ventura (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1016, 1024 [ 282 Cal.Rptr. 877 ]; Eldridge v. … (Service Employees International Union v.

People v. Smith

132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 230 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 2003

(See U.S. v. Trala, supra, 162 F.Supp.2d at p. 343 ; People v. Brown (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 623, 634 [ 110 Cal.Rptr.2d 750 ] [substructures].) … (People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 530 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 ]; People v. Axell, supra, 235 Cal.App.3d at p. 854 ; People v. Smith (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 19, 25 [ 263 Cal.Rptr. 678 ]; People v.

Camarena v. State Personnel Bd.

54 Cal. App. 4th 698 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1997

(Pereyda v. State Personnel Board (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 47, 50 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 746 ].) We do not substitute our own judgment if the board’s decision “ ‘ “is one which could have been made by reasonable people. . . .” … (See, e.g., Stanton v.

Ex Parte Yung

7 Cal. App. 440 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1908

Ch. v. Balt, 6 Gill (Md.), 391, [ 48 Am. Dec. 542] ; 21 Am. & Eng. … E. 563 ], citing Cronin v. People, 82 N. Y. 323 , 37 Am.

People v. McClain

209 Cal. App. 2d 224 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1962

Brown : I have here a certified copy of a prison commitment in the County of Los Angeles from the Sheriff’s Department and will you stipulate to identity? “Mr. Branch : Yes. “Mr. Brown: You stipulate to identity? “Mr. … Brown: May this be marked People’s 2 for identification ? “The Court: All right.”