Case law

People v. City of San Diego

71 Cal. App. 421 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 1925

In Reynolds v. … As was said in the case of People v. Holladay, supra, “The judgment in Holladay v.

Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.

7 Cal. App. 534 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 6, 1908

In support of his contention respondent cites Young v. Wright, 52 Cal. 410 , Judah v. Fredericks, 57 Cal. 391 , and City of Los Angeles v. Mellus, 59 Cal. 451 . … Bergin, 127 Cal. 578 , [ 60 Pac. 164 ], the allegation, “The board of supervisors duly made and passed a resolution” is approved. In Werth v. Springfield, 78 Mo. 107 , and Stewart v.

Okasaki v. City of Elk Grove

203 Cal. App. 4th 1043 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 2012

Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.). … Brown Act violation.

Galli v. State of California

98 Cal. App. 3d 662 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1979

Co. v. … (Meyer v. Board of Trustees (1961) 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 431 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].)

Bambula v. Superior Court

174 Cal. App. 3d 653 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1985

(In re Jose S. (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 619, 626 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 309 ]; accord Brown v. Swickard (1985) 163 Cal.App.3d 820, 825 [ 209 Cal.Rptr. 844 ].) … (Brown v. Swickard, supra, 163 Cal.App.3d at pp. 826-830.)

People v. Denne

141 Cal. App. 2d 499 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 1956

(People v. Bagley, 133 Cal.App.2d 481, 484 [ 284 P.2d 36 ]; People v. Torres, supra; People v. Brickman, supra.) … Brown, 45 Cal.2d 640 [ 290 P.2d 528 ]; People v. Boyles, 45 Cal.2d 652 [ 290 P.2d 535 ]; People v. Simon, 45 Cal.2d 645 [ 290 P.2d 531 ]; People v. Michael, 45 Cal.2d 751 [ 290 P.2d 852 ]; People v.

Ching v. San Francisco Bd. of Permit Appeals

60 Cal. App. 4th 888 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 1998

(Presenting Jamul v. … In Beresford Neighborhood Assn. v.

Reliable Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior Court

158 Cal. App. 3d 604 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1984

During his 90 days as an employee of defendants, and while the injunction was in effect, Rutkowski saw the “glory holes” being boarded up on two occasions. … Neal built upon the transaction test discussed in People v. Brown (1958) 49 Cal.2d 577 at page 591 [ 320 P.2d 5 ], The “Neal” test is sometimes called the “Brown-Neal” test. (See, e.g., People v.

In re Shelton

California Court of Appeal · Aug 24, 2020

In a prison system in which the treatment of mentally ill inmates has been declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court (Brown v. Plata (2011) 563 U.S. 493, affirming Coleman v. Wilson (E.D. … (Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion v. City of Rancho Cucamonga (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 473, 479–480; Dobbins v. San Diego County Civil Service Com. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 125, 128, fn. 3.)”

Willis v. Prime Healthcare Services

California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 2014

(Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown (2012) 565 U.S. __, __ [132 S.Ct. 1201, 1203-1204]; see Mave Enterprises, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 1408, 1428 & fn. 6.) … While the individual contracts were in effect, the union filed a petition for certification as a bargaining representative with the National Labor Relations Board (the board). (Ibid.)

NNN Congress Center v. Locoh CA4/3

California Court of Appeal · Jan 10, 2024

Filed 1/10/24 NNN Congress Center v. … (Aguilar v.

In Re KF

173 Cal. App. 4th 655 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 2009

Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorney General, Martin S. … (See People v. Birkett (1999) 21 Cal.4th 226, 246 [ 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 205 , 980 P.2d 912 ]; People v.

Van De Water v. Pridham

33 Cal. App. 252 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 1917

(State v. Jennings, 27 Ark. 419 ; Torrance v. McDougald, 12 Ga. 526 ; Mason v. Finch, 2 Scam. (Ill.) 223; In re Vanderberg, 28 Kan. 173 ; Pond v. Maddox, 38 Cal. 572 .) … (Board of Directors of Modesto Irr. Dist. v. Tregea, 88 Cal. 334 , [ 26 Pac. 237 ]; La Mesa Homes Co. v. La Mesa etc. Irr. Dist., 173 Cal. 121 , [ 159 Pac. 593 ]; In re Madera Irr. Dist., 92 Cal. 297 , [ 27 Am. St.

Woollomes v. Woody

79 Cal. App. 2d 696 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1947

Appellant cites County of Humboldt v. … (See Richardson v. Morrison, 101 Cal.App. 418 [281P. 726].) Likewise, it may be noted that in County of Humboldt v.

Ashburn v. Miller

161 Cal. App. 2d 71 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1958

Co. v. … Miller said, ‘Brown, do you know of any fill on that lot?’, and Brown said, ‘As far as I know, I don’t know of any fill.’

People v. Blis

3 Cal. App. 162 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1906

In Brown v. … The case of Brown v.

DeMott v. AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS AND BUTCHER WORKMEN

157 Cal. App. 2d 13 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1958

Herbert V. … (Holder-by v. International Union etc. Engineers, 45 Cal.2d 843 [ 291 P.2d 463 ] ; Gonzales v. International Assn. of Machinists, 142 Cal.App.2d 207 [ 298 P.2d 92 ].)

Brandt v. Riley

139 Cal. App. 250 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1934

(Whyte v. State, 110 Cal. App. 314 [ 294 Pac. 417 ]; Grimes v. County of Merced, 96 Cal. App. 76 [ 273 Pac. 839 ]; 26 R. C. L. 459, sec. 414; 61 C. J. 985, secs. 1263-1267; 2 Cooley on Taxation, 3d ed., p. 1487; 64 A. … (Meek v. McClure, 49 Cal. 623, 628 .)

People v. Hunter

California Court of Appeal · Sep 11, 2017

(Izazaga v. … (See People v.

McQuilkin v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.

27 Cal. App. 698 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1915

Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 52 W. Va. 410 , [ 44 S. … Co. v. Adams Machine Co., 92 Miss. 849 , [ 47 South. 412 ]; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hall, 124 U. S. 444 , [ 31 L. Ed. 479 , 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 577].