Case law

Morrison v. White

10 Cal. App. 2d 261 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1935

Thereafter the board of supervisors canvassed the returns of the special election and declared the result. In the case of City and County of San Francisco v. … (See Morgan v. City of Los Angeles, 182 Cal. 301 [ 187 Pac. 1050 ] ; Mead v. City of Los Angeles, 185 Cal. 422 [ 197 Pac. 65 ].)” A recent ease, Vela v.

Cox v. First National Bank

10 Cal. App. 2d 302 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1935

(Copeland v. Melrose National Bank of New York, 229 App. Div. 311 [ 241 N. Y. Supp. 429 ] ; First National Bank of Colquitt v. Miller, 23 Ga. App. 441 [ 98 S. E. 402 ] ; Van Slyke v. Andrews, 146 Minn. 316 [ 178 N. … R. 1068] ; Rankin v. Tygard, 198 Fed. 795 .)

DeCelle v. City of Alameda

221 Cal. App. 2d 528 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1963

In Dillon v. … (Flaherty v. Board of Retirement (1961) 198 Cal.App.2d 397, 408 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 256 ]; Jenner v. City Council (1958) 164 Cal.App.2d 490, 499-500 [ 331 P.2d 176 ].)

In Re Marriage of Davis

113 Cal. App. 3d 485 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 1980

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), J. Howard L. Davis appeals an order modifying the judgment dissolving his marriage to Lorraine A. Davis. … Lorraine should have brought an independent action to determine her interest, if any, in them (Bodle v.

City of Pasadena v. Paine

126 Cal. App. 2d 93 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 18, 1954

(Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals, 23 Cal.2d 303, 310 [ 144 P.2d 4 ].) … (Brougher v. Board of Public Works, 205 Cal. 426, 437 [ 271 P. 487 ] ; West Coast Adver. Co. v. San Francisco, 14 Cal.2d 516, 522 [ 95 P.2d 138 ] ; Arnold v. City of San Diego, 120 Cal.App.2d 353, 358 [ 261 P.2d 33 ].)

Bryan v. Prescott

57 Cal. App. 779 · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 1922

In Magee v. … (See, also, Cox v.

Assn. for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. County of L.A.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 2019

In ALADS v. … The PERB is a “quasi-judicial administrative agency” modeled after the National Labor Relations Board. (§ 3540; County of Los Angeles v.

In Re Ross

185 Cal. App. 4th 636 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 2010

(Ginns v. Savage (1964) 61 Cal.2d 520, 524, fn. 2 [ 39 Cal.Rptr. 377 , 393 P.2d 689 ]; see Silverbrand v. … V, § 8, subd.

Williams v. Elliott

127 Cal. App. 2d 357 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1954

Co. v. … Appellant cites cases on the rule of substantial performance (Thomas Haverty Co. v. Jones, 185 Cal. 285 [ 197 P. 105 ] ; Brown v. Aguilar, 202 Cal. 143 [ 259 P. 735 ] ; Jones & Laughlin Steel Co. v.

Anderson v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

159 Cal. App. 2d 413 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1958

State Personnel Board, 22 Cal.2d 198 [ 137 P.2d 433 ] ; United States v. Superior Court, 19 Cal.2d 189, 194 [ 120 P.2d 26 ]; City & County of San Francisco v. … (See also La Rue v. Board of Trustees, 40 Cal.App.2d 287 [ 104 P.2d 689 ].) The mailing of a notice of appeal is not the equivalent of constructive filing. Van De Veer v.

City of San Jose v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.

California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 2024

“The charter of a municipality is its constitution” (Brown v. City of Berkeley (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 223, 231), and “a charter city may not act in conflict with its charter.” (Domar Electric, Inc. v. … (Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 665.) We review 11 questions of constitutional and statutory interpretation de novo. 8 (City of Lafayette v.

County of Humboldt v. Shelly

220 Cal. App. 2d 194 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1963

(Lynch v. Birdwell (1955) 44 Cal.2d 839, 851 [ 285 P.2d 919 ]; Brown v. Regan (1938) 10 Cal.2d 519, 523 [ 75 P.2d 1063 ]; Bisnett v. Hollis (1962) 207 Cal.App.2d 142, 150 [ 24 Cal.Rptr. 231 ].) … In People v.

In re J.G.

159 Cal. App. 4th 1056 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 2008

V. … Thus, in Coca-Cola Co. v.

Dosier v. Wilcox-Crittendon Co.

45 Cal. App. 3d 74 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 1975

At the time of the purchase the “hook” was selected by the buyer from a display board featuring harness equipment such as bridles, spurs and bits; there was no discussion as to intended use when the purchase was made. … J., and Brown (H. G), J., concurred.

Browning v. Dow

60 Cal. App. 680 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 1923

(Jacobs v. Board of Supervisors, 100 Cal. 121, 129 [ 34 Pac. 630, 632 ].) … (People v. Board of Supervisors, 84 Ill. 303 [ 25 Am. Rep. 461 ].)

Shaw v. L.A. Unified School Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 2023

LAUSD rests its argument on Crawford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 Cal.3d 280. … County of San Diego v. Brown is instructive. (County of San Diego v. Brown (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 1054 (Brown).)

Paulino v. Civil Service Commission

175 Cal. App. 3d 962 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1985

(Macfarlane v. Dept. Alcoholic Bev. Control (1958) 51 Cal.2d 84, 91 [ 330 P.2d 769 ]; Brown v. Gordon (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 659, 667 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 901 ].) … (Blake v. State Personnel Board (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 541, 554 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 50 ].)

Mira Monte Homeowners Assn. v. County of Ventura

165 Cal. App. 3d 357 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1985

This is true even if the Board would have reached the identical findings and determination had it been in compliance. (Rural Land Owners Assn. v. … (Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].)

Raygoza v. County of Los Angeles

17 Cal. App. 4th 1240 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1993

(See Craver v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 42 Cal.App.3d 76 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 534 ]; O’Toole v. Retirement Board (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 600 [ 188 Cal.Rptr. 853 ]; and Stuessel v. … In Barber v.

Anderson v. Chancellor Western Oil Development Corp.

53 Cal. App. 3d 235 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 1975

In Van Arsdale v. … On the other hand, the use of a scaffold (and that is all that a “stabbing board” is) does not constitute an inherently dangerous or peculiar activity (Hard v.