Case law

In Re Reed on Habeas Corpus

171 Cal. App. 4th 1071 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 2009

In Samson v. … (Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471, 483 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 484 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ].) It is precisely this risk that justifies the imposition of extensive restrictions on the parolee’s behavior. (People v.

Mullin Lumber Co. v. Chandler

185 Cal. App. 3d 1127 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1986

The complaint alleged Mullin sold Chandler the board that broke and the board was defective. … Co. v.

Camarillo Sanitary Dist. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 2025

(Carrancho v. California Air Resources Board (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1264–1265.) … (Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Board of Equalization, supra, 57 Cal.4th at p. 415.)

Assn. for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. County of L.A.

California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 2019

In ALADS v. … The PERB is a “quasi-judicial administrative agency” modeled after the National Labor Relations Board. (§ 3540; County of Los Angeles v.

Davis v. Milligan

166 Cal. App. 2d 404 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1958

As stated in Robinson v. … I pay no rent for the service station property at Brown and Midway in Durham. The only consideration for my use of the above service station property is that I buy my gasoline and the oil Mr. Milligan sells from him.

In Re Johnson

8 Cal. App. 4th 618 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1992

If, as and when the Board rescinds parole, that determination will be subject to judicial review. V. … Similarly in People v.

In re Gomez

190 Cal. App. 4th 1291 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 2010

The Governor’s decision to affirm, modify, or reverse the decision of the Board rests on the same factors that guide the Board’s decision (Cal. Const., art. V, § 8, subd. … This court’s nonpublished opinion in People v. Gomez (Dec. 19, 1991, G010300) recites facts consistent with petitioner’s version of the events as it relates to what he told Pompa after the killing.

People v. Sonleitner

185 Cal. App. 2d 350 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1960

Bank v. … Co. v.

Wright v. Redwood Theatres, Inc.

49 Cal. App. 2d 403 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1942

In Robbins v. Law, 48 Cal. … Thus it is held in Moore v.

Griffith Co. v. Hofues

201 Cal. App. 2d 502 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1962

BROWN, J. Defendant is the administrator with the will annexed of Prank S. Hofues, Sr., deceased. … County of San Luis Obispo v.

People Ex Rel. Webb v. Honey Lake Valley Irrigation District

77 Cal. App. 367 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1926

In Carter v. … Union v. Reclamation Dist., 144 Cal. 639 [ 79 Pac. 374 ]; Barnes v. Glide, 117 Cal. 1 [ 59 Am. St. Rep. 153 , 48 Pac. 804 ].)

People v. Weeks

165 Cal. App. 4th 882 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 2008

Brown v. Wainwright (5th Cir. 1982) 665 F.2d 607, 612 (Brown), upon which appellant also relies, is similar. … (Brown, supra, 665 F.2d at p. 611 .)

People v. Gish

230 Cal. App. 2d 544 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 1964

(People v. Municipal Court, 145 Cal.App.2d 767, 771 [303 P.2d 375]; People v. Mason, 184 Cal.App.2d 182 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 525 ].) If not procedural, defendant’s case would come under the decision in People v. … Coughlin, J., and Brown (Gerald), J., concurred.

In re Riley

California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2014

At the same time, as a result of Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471 (Morrissey), the procedural protections declared by the United States Supreme Court in Goldberg v. … “After the reduction in the size of the nonindeterminately sentenced prison population necessary to comply with the directive of the Supreme Court in Brown v.

Kimberlin v. Los Angeles City High School District

115 Cal. App. 2d 459 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1953

This for the reason that, as said in Newbury v. … (Greenberg v. DuBain Realty Corp., 27 Cal.App.2d 111, 118 [ 80 P.2d 537 ]).” See, also, Fry v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.2d 753, 761 [ 112 P.2d 229 ] ; Fabian v. Alphonzo E.

People v. Staker

154 Cal. App. 2d 773 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1957

In People v. … In People v.

D'AGOSTINO v. Superior Court

33 Cal. App. 4th 107 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1995

In Browne v. … (See Board of Supervisors v.

Kensinger v. Abbott Laboratories

171 Cal. App. 3d 376 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1985

(Brown v. Bleiberg (1982) 32 Cal.3d 426, 433 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 228 , 651 P.2d 815 ]; Hills v. Aronsohn (1984) 152 Cal.App.3d 753, 759 [ 199 Cal.Rptr. 816 ].) … (S anchez v.

Finnan v. Reclamation Dist. No. 273

26 Cal. App. 714 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1915

This is settled by the cases of Turrill v. Grattan, 52 Cal. 97 ; Mulligan v. Smith, 59 Cal. 206 , and Kahn v. … (Chase v. Trout, 146 Cal. 356 , [ 80 Pac. 81 ].) In the case just cited and in German etc. Society v.

Margolis & Tisman v. Chen CA2/8

California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 2025

Filed 12/15/25 Margolis & Tisman v. … (Falahati v.