Case law

Aldrich v. Chino School District

109 Cal. App. 14 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 1930

The board had no power, under the code section above quoted, to accept the resignation as of August 1st (see Armstrong v. … (Higgins v. San Diego, 118 Cal. 524 [ 45 Pac. 824 , 50 Pac. 670 ]; Buck v. City of Eureka, 124 Cal. 61 [ 56 Pac. 612 ] ; Martin v. Fisher et al., 108 Cal. App. 34 [ 291 Pac. 476 ].)

DPR Construction v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 2025

ADJ11348013) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and ALONZO MCCLANAHAN, Respondents. … (Telles Transport, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 1159, 1163 (Telles).) We review the board’s interpretation of its governing statutes de novo. (Alvarez v. Workers’ Comp.

County of Sonoma v. Pub. Employment Relations Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 2022

The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA; Gov. … (Dibb v.

Doe v. Lawndale Elementary School Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 2021

(Archbishop, supra, 70 Cal.App.5th at p. 669; see Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021) 11 Cal.5th 204, 213 (Brown); Nally v. Grace Community Church (1988) 47 Cal.3d 278, 292.) … (Brown, at p. 215; see Delgado v. Trax Bar & Grill (2005) 36 Cal.4th 224, 235.)

Pennington v. George W. Pennington Sons

27 Cal. App. 57 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1915

on Corporations, 7th ed., sec. 713A, p. 2462; Wright v. … Practically the same question presented here was involved in the case of Porter v. Lassen County etc.

People v. Calban

65 Cal. App. 3d 578 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1976

Brown (G. A.), P. … In the present case, as in People v.

Mission Springs Water Dist. v. Desert Water Agency

California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 2024

V. … (Professional Engineers in California Government v. Kempton (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1016, 1038.) When two statutes are irreconcilable, “‘the later statute prevails.’” (Briggs v. Brown (2017) 3 Cal.5th 808, 840.)

Carrier v. Robbins

112 Cal. App. 2d 32 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1952

Co. v. Caminetti, 59 Cal.App.2d 501, 505 [ 139 P.2d 691 ].) In Allen v. … In Banks v.

Dressler v. County of Alpine

64 Cal. App. 3d 557 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1976

Services Corp. v. County of Santa Clara, 54 Cal.App.3d 579, 583 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 715 ].) In Board of Supervisors v. … The present discussion leads to a reappraisal of our footnote in Board of Supervisors v. Archer, supra.

LeBlanc v. Browne

78 Cal. App. 2d 63 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1947

Browne and Mrs. Nellie B. Feltman, a disinterested witness. … Johnson, supra, 174 Cal. 55, 58-59 ; Hyams v. Simoncelli (1940), 41 Cal.App.2d 126, 132 [ 106 P.2d 68 ]; Wright v. Foreman (1927), 86 Cal.App. 595, 602 [ 261 P. 481 ]; Lewis v.

Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. Gourmet Farms

108 Cal. App. 3d 181 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1980

In Bd. of Trade of San Francisco v. … In Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. v.

D'AGOSTINO v. Superior Court

33 Cal. App. 4th 107 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1995

In Browne v. … (See Board of Supervisors v.

Mohilef v. Janovici

51 Cal. App. 4th 267 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1996

(See Board of Regents v. Roth (1972) 408 U.S. 564, 571 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 548, 557 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 ]; Traverso v. People ex rel. … (Chongris v. Board of Appeals of Town of Andover (1st Cir. 1987) 811 F.2d 36, 41-42 ].)

Imp. Irrig. Dist. v. St. Wat. Resources Ctrl.

225 Cal. App. 3d 548 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1990

In Mandel v. … In Sklar v. Franchise Tax Board (1986) 185 Cal. App.3d 616 [ 230 Cal.

Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Bradbury

183 Cal. App. 2d 40 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1960

City of Los Angeles, 10 Cal.App.2d 407, 412 [ 52 P.2d 545]; Wood v. Board of Police & Fire Pension Commrs., 49 Cal.App.2d 52 [ 120 P.2d 898 ] ; Stewart v. McCollister, 37 Cal.2d 203 [ 231 P.2d 48 ] ; Musto-Kennan Co. v. … In Brill v.

Beeson v. City of Los Angeles

115 Cal. App. 122 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1931

(Farmers & Merchants’ Bank v. Los Angeles, 151 Cal. 655 [ 91 Pac. 795 ].) ’ (Gei mann v. Board of Police Commrs., 158 Cal. 748 [ 112 Pac. 553 ].) … Co. v. Los Angeles, 207 Cal. 430 [ 270 Pac. 1028 ], and Spencer v.

Devlin v. Donnelly

20 Cal. App. 495 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1912

The board of supervisors has completed its canvass and the result has been duly certified to the secretary of state. In the Los Angeles case the court followed the decision in Rice v. … Prom Rice v.

Katz v. Chevron Corp.

22 Cal. App. 4th 1352 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1994

In Morse v. … In Will v.

McPherson v. Richards

134 Cal. App. 462 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1933

Justice Shaw, in the case of Jones v. De Shields, 187. … In support of this declaration of law, the case of Pimental v. San Francisco, 21 Cal. 351 , is cited.

People v. Silverstein

52 Cal. App. 2d 725 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1942

(United States v. Marrin, 227 Fed. 314 .) … The United States could waive its right to the custody of the prisoner (Cato v.