Case law

Hughes v. County of San Diego

35 Cal. App. 3d 349 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1973

Hughes relies on the recent California Supreme Court case of Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 ], to support his argument section 844.6 is unconstitutional. This reliance is misplaced. … Brown v. Merlo, supra, 8 Cal.3d 855 is not as directly analogous to this case as is the case of County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court, 62 Cal.2d 839 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 796 , 402 P.2d 868 ].

City of Los Angeles v. Gage

127 Cal. App. 2d 442 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1954

(Ex parte Hadacheck, 165 Cal. 416, 420, 421 [ 132 P. 584 , L.R.A. 1916B 1248 ] ; Curtis v. City of Los Angeles, 172 Cal. 230, 234 [ 156 P. 462 ] ; Brown v. … (Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 497, 512 [ 234 P. 388 ].)

People v. Morris

211 Cal. App. 2d 274 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1962

(People v. Hart, 177 Cal.App.2d 484, 485-486 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 226 ]; People v. Pendarvis, 178 Cal.App.2d 239, 241 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 824 ] ; People v. Gardner, 177 Cal.App.2d 43, 45-46 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 830 ] ; People v. … People v. Andrews, 153 Cal.App.2d 333, 338 [ 314 P.2d 175 ] ; People v. Edwards, 142 Cal.App.2d 419, 420 [ 298 P.2d 664 ]; People v. Almarez, 190 Cal.App.2d 380, 382 [ 12 Cal. Rptr. 111 ] ; People v.

County of Sonoma v. Pub. Employment Relations Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 2022

The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA; Gov. … (Dibb v.

People Ex Rel. Webb v. Honey Lake Valley Irrigation District

77 Cal. App. 367 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1926

In Carter v. … Union v. Reclamation Dist., 144 Cal. 639 [ 79 Pac. 374 ]; Barnes v. Glide, 117 Cal. 1 [ 59 Am. St. Rep. 153 , 48 Pac. 804 ].)

People Ex Rel. Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of Santa Clara

49 Cal. App. 4th 1471 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1996

(Shoban v. Board of Trustees (1969) 276 Cal.App.2d 534, 541 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 112 ].) … (Grimm v. City of San Diego (1979) 94 Cal.App.3d 33, 40 [ 156 Cal.Rptr. 240 ].) The county parole board is itself a public office. (Webster v. Board of Education (1903) 140 Cal. 331, 332 [ 73 P. 1070 ].)

Weinberg v. Superior Court

21 Cal. App. 3d 1018 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1971

(People v. Marshall, 69 Cal.2d 51, 56 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 585 , 442 P.2d 665 ]; People v. Gilbert, 63 Cal.2d 690, 707 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 909 , 408 P.2d 365 ]; People v. Roberts, 47 Cal.2d 374, 379 [ 303 P.2d 721 ]; People v. … The following discussion sharply defines the distinction between People v. Superior Court, supra, 275 Cal.App.2d 489 , and the instant case. “In Oliver [v.

Coachella Valley Unified School Dist. v. State of California

176 Cal. App. 4th 93 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 2009

(See, e.g., Morris v. … ."]; Alford v.

PEOPLE EX REL. DEPT. PUB. WKS v. Bosio

47 Cal. App. 3d 495 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1975

As the court said in Friends of Lake Arrowhead v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 38 Cal. … As pointed out in Brown v. State Personnel Board (1941) 43 Cal.

People v. City of Los Angeles

160 Cal. App. 2d 494 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1958

(More v. Massini, 32 Cal. 590 at 594 ; Island Rec. Dist. No. 776 v. Floribel Alfalfa Syndicate, 167 Cal. 467 at 471 [ 140 P. 4 ]; Smith v. Wheeler, 107 Cal.App.2d 451 at 455 [ 237 P.2d 325 ].) … Simmons v. Mayor, etc. of City of Paterson, 60 N.J.Eq. 385 [ 45 A. 995 ]; Du Pont Rayon Co. v. Richmond Industries, 85 F.2d 981 ; Attwood v. City of Bangor, 85 Me. 583 [ 22 A. 466 ].

Silk v. Feldman

208 Cal. App. 4th 547 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 2012

(O’Keefe v. Kompa (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 130, 134 [ 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 602 ].) … (O’Keefe v. Kompa, supra, 84 Cal.App.4th at p. 134 .) As a member of the board, Feldman’s aim in the derivative litigation should be to obtain a resolution favorable to the Club.

Heilig v. Superior Court

149 Cal. App. 3d 978 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1983

In Abbott Power Corp. v. … (Abbott Power Corp. v. Overhead Electric Co., supra, 60 Cal.App.3d at pp. 281-282.) In Schlussel v.

In Re Scott

34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 905 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 2005

As the Governor is required to address the same factors the Board is required to consider (Cal. Const., art. V, § 8, subd. … (People v.

In Re Marriage of Donnelly

142 Cal. App. 3d 135 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1983

Co. v. Bank of Italy (1923) 60 Cal.App. 602 [ 214 P. 61 ].) … (Biltoft v. Wootten (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 58, 60-62 [ 157 Cal.Rptr. 581 ].)

In re Young

204 Cal. App. 4th 288 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 2012

According to our opinion in People v. … (Hayward v. Marshal (9th Cir. 2010) 603 F.3d 546, 563 .)

The Retail Property Trust v. Orange County Assessment etc.

California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 2026

(Slocum v. State Bd. of Equalization (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 969, 973–974 (Slocum); see Neecke v. … (See Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. Vigilant Ins. Co. (2024) 15 Cal.5th 1106, 1117 [“physical damage” means distinct, demonstrable, physical alteration to property]; Wellness Eatery La Jolla v.

Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. Superior Court

101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 863 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 2000

Automotive Management Group, Inc. v. … Citing City of Carmel-by-the-Sea v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 964, 970-971 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 379 ], Saba argues that the board waived its right of appeal. This argument is hardly worthy of a response.

People v. Nagel

17 Cal. App. 3d 492 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1971

(See People v. Dukes, 1 Cal.App.3d 913, 916 [82 Cal.Rptr, 218].) Officer Brown testified that he intended to take defendant to Hollywood station where an officer was available to accept bail. … In Virgil v.

Campbell Elementary Teachers Assn., Inc. v. Abbott

76 Cal. App. 3d 796 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 1978

(Lucas v. Board of Trustees, supra, 18 Cal.App.3d at p. 992.) … (Rutherford v. Board of Trustees, supra, 64 Cal.App.3d at p. 177 .)

Kaiser Center, Inc. v. County of Alameda

189 Cal. App. 3d 978 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1987

Poods, Inc. v. … (See De Luz Homes, Inc. v.