Case law

Phillips v. County of Fresno

225 Cal. App. 3d 1240 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1990

(Dillon v. Board of Pension Commrs., supra, 18 Cal.2d at p. 431 ; Skaggs v. City of Los Angeles (1954) 43 Cal.2d 497, 500 [ 275 P.2d 9 ].) … (McGriff v.

People v. Morgan

California Court of Appeal · Jul 8, 2024

I 5 People v. Brown (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 140 (Brown). 13 don’t agree with that theory.” The trial court then indicated it would deny the motion. … (Brown, supra, 245 Cal.App.4th at p. 153.)

Cornejo v. Lightbourne

220 Cal. App. 4th 932 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 2013

(Gatto v. … (Garcia v.

In Re Retirement Cases

1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 790 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 11, 2003

(Betts v. Board of Administration (1978) 21 Cal.3d 859, 866 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 158 , 582 P.2d 614 ].) … equity”; they cite Board of Administration v.

Rodriguez v. Superior Court

221 Cal. App. 3d 1371 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1990

Petitioners (plaintiffs) 1 ask us to determine that the holding of the Supreme Court in Brown v. … Its order stated, in part: “While it is self-evident that the rationale of Brown v.

Hulbert v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.

47 Cal. App. 3d 634 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1975

HULBERT, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Respondents. Docket No. 35402. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. … This statute applies equally to "the courts" and to the Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board (see Beaida v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 263 Cal. App.2d 204, 208-209 [ 69 Cal.

DPR Construction v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 2025

ADJ11348013) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and ALONZO MCCLANAHAN, Respondents. … (Telles Transport, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 1159, 1163 (Telles).) We review the board’s interpretation of its governing statutes de novo. (Alvarez v. Workers’ Comp.

Chambers v. Davis

131 Cal. App. 500 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1933

(Dutart v. Woodward, 99 Cal. App. 736 [ 279 Pac. 493 .].) … The board had no power to deprive her of that vested right. (Sec. 5.500, School Code; Owens v. Board of Education, 68 Cal. App. 403 [ 229 Pac. 881, 882 ].

Doe v. Lawndale Elementary School Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 2021

(Archbishop, supra, 70 Cal.App.5th at p. 669; see Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021) 11 Cal.5th 204, 213 (Brown); Nally v. Grace Community Church (1988) 47 Cal.3d 278, 292.) … (Brown, at p. 215; see Delgado v. Trax Bar & Grill (2005) 36 Cal.4th 224, 235.)

People Ex Rel. Sill v. Murphy

20 Cal. App. 398 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 1912

People v. … (State v. Marston, 6 Kan. 524 ; Peters v. Board of State Canvassers, 17 Kan. 365 ; State v. Stevens, 23 Kan. 456 , [ 33 Am. Rep. 175 ]; People v. Board of Canvassers, 129 N. Y. 360 , [14 L. R. A. 646, 29 N.

Pennington v. George W. Pennington Sons

27 Cal. App. 57 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1915

on Corporations, 7th ed., sec. 713A, p. 2462; Wright v. … Practically the same question presented here was involved in the case of Porter v. Lassen County etc.

Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus

200 Cal. App. 4th 1066 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 2011

(People v. Jenkins (1995) 10 Cal.4th 234, 246 [ 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 903 , 893 P.2d 1224 ].)” (Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 977-978 [ 90 Cal.Rptr.2d 260 , 987 P.2d 727 ].) … (North Pacifica, LLC v. City of Pacifica (N.D.Cal. 2002) 234 F.Supp.2d 1053, 1058 , disapproved on other grounds in North Pacifica LLC v. City of Pacifica (2008) 526 F.3d 478 .)

United Indian Health etc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 2025

. / Tribal First v. … United Indian Health Services, Inc. / Tribal First v.

Hochfelder v. County of Los Angeles

126 Cal. App. 2d 370 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1954

Co. v. Los Angeles, 207 Cal. 430, 437 [ 278 P. 1028 ]; Western Salt Co. v. City of San, Diego, 181 Cal. 696 [ 186 P. 345 ].) … Co. v. Los Angeles, supra; Arbios v. San Bernardino County, 110 Cal. 553, 555 [ 42 P. 1080 ].)

Carrier v. Robbins

112 Cal. App. 2d 32 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1952

Co. v. Caminetti, 59 Cal.App.2d 501, 505 [ 139 P.2d 691 ].) In Allen v. … In Banks v.

LeBlanc v. Browne

78 Cal. App. 2d 63 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1947

Browne and Mrs. Nellie B. Feltman, a disinterested witness. … Johnson, supra, 174 Cal. 55, 58-59 ; Hyams v. Simoncelli (1940), 41 Cal.App.2d 126, 132 [ 106 P.2d 68 ]; Wright v. Foreman (1927), 86 Cal.App. 595, 602 [ 261 P. 481 ]; Lewis v.

In Re Criscione

173 Cal. App. 4th 60 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 2009

The Commitment Offense In describing the facts of the commitment offense, the Board read from the published decision in Criscione’s direct appeal, People v. … (Ross v. Superior Court (1977) 19 Cal.3d 899, 914-915 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 133 , 569 P.2d 727 ].)

Fiscus v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

155 Cal. App. 2d 234 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1957

Bank v. Board of County Comrs., 264 U.S. 450 [ 44 S.Ct. 385 , 68 L.Ed. 784, 788-789 ].) … (Home Loan Bank Board v. Mallonee, (9 Cir.) 196 F.2d 336 ; Aircraft & D. Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752 , 767 *237 [ 67 S.Ct. 1493 , 91 L.Ed. 1796, 1806 ] ; Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal C. Com.

Boehm v. County of Merced

163 Cal. App. 3d 447 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 1985

However, section 17001 requires that the board adopt the standards of aid and care, and City and County of San Francisco v. … (Sharick v. Galloway (1936) 12 Cal.App.2d 733 [ 55 P.2d 1196 ]. See also Jaques v. Board of Supervisors (1913) 22 Cal.App. 621 [ 135 P. 686 ]; Jarkieh v. Badagliacco (1945) 68 Cal.App.2d 426 [ 156 P.2d 969 ].)

Lexin v. City of San Diego

222 Cal. App. 4th 662 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 2013

(BreakZone Billiards v. … (Shirey v.