Case law

Sinclair v. Baker

219 Cal. App. 2d 817 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 1963

(Fichera v. … (Cooper v. State Board of Public Health (1951) 102 Cal.App.2d 926, 933 [ 229 P.2d 27 ].) Such is the casé- here. Petitioner has no grounds for complaint.

La Shells v. Hench

98 Cal. App. 6 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1929

In the case of Harby v. Board of Education, 2 Cal. … In the case of Curtin v. Board of Police Commrs., 74 Cal.

Jenkins v. Jenkins

112 Cal. App. 402 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1931

Defendant then urges, under the authority of Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1, 8 [ 147 Pac. 1168 ], that this judgment in divorce, having became final, determined that the policy of insurance was not community property. … If the doctrine of the Brown case is applied to its utmost the extent of the holding would be that by reason of the decree in the case of Jenkins v.

Ebel v. Superior Court

39 Cal. App. 3d 934 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1974

Petitioners rely on Sharff v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.2d 508 [ 282 P.2d 896 , 64 A.L.R.2d 494 ] and Gonzi v. … Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Franson, J., concurred.

Killian v. City and County of San Francisco

77 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1978

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., supra, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 ); . . . … (Crumpler v. Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567, 582-583 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 293 ].)

Burien, LLC v. Wiley

230 Cal. App. 4th 1039 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 2014

(Doe v. Brown (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 408, 417.) We begin with the words of the statute. (Ibid.) “Words used in a statute or constitutional provision should be given the meaning they bear in ordinary use. [Citations.] … (Lungren v. Deukmejian (1988) 45 Cal.3d 727, 735.)

Gould v. Santa Ana High School District

131 Cal. App. 345 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1933

(Fairchild v. Board of Education, 107 Cal. 92 [ 40 Pac. 26 ] ; Loehr v. Board of Education, 12 Cal. App. 671 [ 108 Pac. 325 ].) … *350 In Martin v.

Sevina v. Hickok

113 Cal. App. 301 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 9, 1931

Board of Police Commrs., 197 Cal. 70 [ 239 Pac. 844 ], Garvin v. Chambers, 195 Cal. 212 [ 232 Pac. 696 ], Boyd v. Pendergast, 57 Cal. App. 504 [ 207 Pac. 713 ], French v. … (Mogan v. Board of Police Commrs., 100 Cal. App. 270, 276 [ 279 Pac. 1080 ].)

King v. Larsen Realty, Inc.

121 Cal. App. 3d 349 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1981

V, § 1), and impose upon members the duty to arbitrate as set forth in the Arbitration Manual (art. VII). The bylaws of the Santa Ynez Valley Board of Realtors contain identical provisions. … (Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc. v.

McDonald v. Richards

79 Cal. App. 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1926

As stated in the case of Board of Education v. … To the same effect is the case of Board of Education v. Common Council, 1 Cal. App. 311 [ 82 Pac. 89 ].

Eller Media Co. v. Community Redevelopment Agency

133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 324 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 2003

Eller appealed the determinations of CRA staff to the Board of Commissioners of CRA (Board of Commissioners). … (Brown v. Boren (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1319 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 758 ].)

Carmichael v. Riley

56 Cal. App. 409 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1922

(Power v. May, 114 Cal. 207 [ 46 Pac. 6 ]; Id., 123 Cal. 147 [ 55 Pac. 796 ]; Buck v. City of Eureka, 124 Cal. 61 [ 56 Pac. 612 ] ; Crowe v. Boyle, 184 Cal. 117 [ 193 Pac. 111 ]; Sittig v. Raney, 53 Cal. … (Colusa County v. De Jarnett, 55 Cal. 373 ; McFarland v. McCowen, 98 Cal. 329 [ 33 Pac. 113 ] ; McConoughey v. Jackson, 101 Cal. 265 [ 40 Am. St. Rep. 53 , 35 Pac. 863 ]; McBride v.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

42 Cal. App. 3d 32 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 1974

(Stenocord Corp. v. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 63 Cal.2d 222, 233 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 869 , 404 P.2d 477 ].)

Sonleitner v. Superior Court

158 Cal. App. 2d 258 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 6, 1958

City of Clinton, 55 Iowa 549 [ 8 N.W. 423, 424 ]; Thomas Forman Co. v. Owsley County Board of Supervisors, 267 Ky. 224 [ 101 S.W.2d 939, 941 ]; City of Covington v. … Cassidy, 27 La.Ann. 704 ; Board of Commrs. of Mille Lacs County v. Morrison, 22 Minn. 178, 181 ; Spitcaufsky v. Hatten, 353 Mo. 94 [ 182 S.W.2d 86, 95 , 160 A.L.R. 990 ]; State ex rel. Ferguson v.

People v. Zamani

183 Cal. App. 4th 854 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 2010

Defendant cites People v. … (People v. Russell (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 1415, 1431 [ 51 Cal.Rptr.3d 263 ].)

Stop Syar Expansion v. County of Napa

California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 2021

[failure to appeal planning commission’s actions ‘in the manner prescribed by the town code’ constituted failure to exhaust administrative remedies]; Browning–Ferris Industries v. … (Town of Atherton v.

Bank of America National trust & Savings Ass'n v. Button

23 Cal. App. 2d 651 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1937

App. (2d) 423 [ 48 Pac. (2d) 120 ]; Brown v. Brown, 83 Cal. App. 74 [ 256 Pac. 595 ]; Ralphs v. Hensler, 97 Cal. 296 [ 32 Pac. 243 ].) This rule has been made subject to exception, in the discretion of the court. … (Sewell v. Johnson, 165 Cal. 762 [ 134 Pac. 704 , Ann. Cas. 1915B, 645] ; City of Los Angeles v. Abbott, 217 Cal. 184 [ 17 Pac. (2d) 993 ].)

Sterling Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. County of Orange

3 Cal. App. 3d 510 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1970

Defendants’ basic contention on appeal is that this court should abrogate the “original package doctrine” as first enunciáted by the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. … Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat., 419 [ 6 L.Ed. 678 ]. As this Court stated almost a century ago in Low v.

State Water Resources Control Bd. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 2025

(See Cohen v. … (Western Oil & Gas Assn. v. Air Resources Board (1984) 37 Cal.3d 502, 509.)

In re Perez

7 Cal. App. 5th 65 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 2016

In Graham v. … In People v.