Case law

People v. Bolian

231 Cal. App. 4th 1415 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 2014

(People v. Brown (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 1213, 1228, quoting People v. Belmontes (1983) 34 Cal.3d 335, 348, fn. 8.) … (People v. Brown, supra, 147 Cal.App.4th at p. 1228; People v. Medina, supra, 89 Cal.App.4th at p. 323.)

Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Ass'n

11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 357 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 2004

Brown (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1097, 1106-1107 [ 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 222 ]), failed to explicitly abrogate the common law rule. … Co. v. Sacramento County (1954) 42 Cal.2d 235 [ 267 P.2d 10 ]]; see Re-Open Rambla, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1499, 1506-1507 [ 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 822 ]; 9 Miller & Starr, supra, § 25:216, p. 660.)

People v. Burns

196 Cal. App. 3d 1440 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1987

People v. … (People v.

County of Los Angeles v. Superior Ct.

California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 2021

In Board of Registered Nursing v. … supported denial of discovery”]; see Weil & Brown, Cal.

MacKey v. Department of Corrections

130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 57 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 2003

In King v. … In Priest v.

Honig v. San Francisco Planning Department

25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 649 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 2005

(Travis v. County of Santa Cruz, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 766, fn. 2 .) … (Lungren v. Deukmejian (1988) 45 Cal.3d 727, 735 [ 248 Cal.Rptr. 115 , 755 P.2d 299 ]; People v. Belton (1979) 23 Cal.3d 516, 526 [ 153 Cal.Rptr. 195 , 591 P.2d 485 ]; Lujan v.

Oaks v. Kendall

23 Cal. App. 2d 715 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 1937

(Belieu v. Power, 54 Cal. App. 244 [ 201 Pac. 620 ] ; Poindexter v. Los Angeles Stone Co., 60 Cal. App. 686 [ 214 Pac. 241 ]; People v. Irwin, 14 Cal. 428 ; 34 C. … In support of that assertion the case of Allen v. Wilson, 178 Cal. 674 [ 174 Pac. 661 ], is cited.

Mixon v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission

192 Cal. App. 3d 1306 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1987

for the board meeting. … Co. (1976) 427 U.S. 273 [ 49 L.Ed.2d 493 , 96 S.Ct. 2574 ]; E.E.O.C. v. Brown & Root, Inc., (5th Cir. 1982) 688 F.2d 338 .)

American Cargo Express v. Super Ct.

California Court of Appeal · Oct 13, 2017

(See, e.g., San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 577 (San Francisco Taxpayers Assn.); Pettus v. Cole (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 402, 435.) … On page 2, third and fourth lines, remove “Workers Compensation Appeals Board (Appeals Board)” and insert the following: Appeals Board On page 2, first full paragraph, remove “We will affirm the judgment” and

Gardner v. Cal. Victim Comp. Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 2026

As a matter of “common[ ]sense” (Bruns v. … (People v. James (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 604, 609.)

People v. Weddles

184 Cal. App. 4th 1365 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 2010

Defendant, Brown, and the third man forced their way into the apartment, knocking Alex to the ground. … As we explained in People v.

Wilkinson v. Norcal Mutual Insurance

98 Cal. App. 3d 307 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1979

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. This appeal is pursued by Jack E. … (See also Mountain View Chamber of Commerce v. City of Mountain View (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 82, 88-89 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 441 ]; Bleeck v. State Board of Optometry (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 415, 431-432 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 860 ].)

City of San Diego v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE

8 Cal. App. 3d 308 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1970

Union, Local No. 513 v. Smith, 194 Kan. 2 [ 397 P.2d 357, 359-360 ]; Board of Education v. Redding, 32 Ill.2d 567 [ 207 N.E.2d 427, 430 ]; State Board of Regents v. United Packing House etc. … (Gen. see Nutter v. City of Santa Monica, supra, 74 Cal. App.2d 292, 297-298 ; Norwalk Teachers' Assn. v. Board of Education, supra, 138 Conn. 269 [ 83 A.2d 482 ]; State Board of Regents v. United Packing House etc.

Kappadahl v. Alcan Pacific Co.

222 Cal. App. 2d 626 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1963

(See Thompson v. City of Long Beach (1953) 41 Cal.2d 235 [ 259 P.2d 649 ]; Riggins v. Board of Education (1956) 144 Cal.App.2d 232, 235 [ 300 P.2d 848 ]; Chenoweth v. … (See e.g., Essick v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 34 Cal.2d 614 ; Johnston v. Board of Supervisors (1947) 31 Cal.2d 66 [ 187 P.2d 686 ].)

People v. Hudson

249 Cal. App. 2d 447 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1967

Appellant now asserts that it was in violation of the rule of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 694 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ] to receive into evidence his statements. Miranda, supra, does not apply to this case. … (See People v. Rollins, 65 Cal.2d 681 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 293 , 423 P.2d 221 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Wood, P. J., and Lillie, J., concurred.

In Re Marriage of Sivyer-Foley & Foley

189 Cal. App. 4th 521 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 2010

Community’s Right to Receive Profits from Martin’s Law Firm Linda argues that the trial court’s conclusion is contrary to In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 ] (Brown), which held … Nonetheless, Martin relies on Garfein v.

City and County of San Francisco v. Padilla

23 Cal. App. 3d 388 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1972

(City & County of S.F. v. Superior Court, supra, at p. 251; Board of Permit Appeals v. Central Permit Bureau, supra, at p. 642.) … (O’Hagen v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra, at p. 162.)

Woodard v. Broadway Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

111 Cal. App. 2d 218 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1952

Bank v. Board of County Comrs., 264 U.S. 450 [ 44 S.Ct. 385 , 68 L.Ed. 784, 788-789 ].) … (Home Loan Bank Board v. Mallonee, (9 Cir.) 196 F.2d 336 ; Aircraft & D. Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 331 U.S. 752, 767 [67 S.Ct.1493, 91 L.Ed. 1796, 1806 ]; Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal C. Com.

Katz v. Karlsson

84 Cal. App. 2d 469 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1948

This was followed by another “bed and board” reconciliation until approximately August, 1940, when the parties separated. … (Bennett v. Brown, 206 Cal. 424 [ 274 P. 532 ] ; Young v. Young Holdings Corp., Ltd., 27 Cal.App.2d 129 [ 80 P. 2d 723 ] ; Barr v. Smith, 97 Cal.App. 398 [ 275 P. 861 ].) It was succinctly explained in Allstead v.

John Doe R.L. v. Merced City Sch. Dist.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 8, 2025

(Brown v. Crandall (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1, 8; Vaughn v. LJ Internat., Inc. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 213, 219.) “We review de novo questions of interpretation and constitutionality of a statute.” (Finberg v. … (West Contra Costa, supra, at p. 1269.) 12 12 District cites Conlin v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 99 Cal. 17, Orange County Foundation v. Irvine Co. (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 195, and Jordan v.