Case law

E.W.A.P., Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

56 Cal. App. 4th 310 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1997

In Young v. … DePiano, Jeff Brown, and Paul Devlin, as support for its argument that no new arrests had been made from the time of the AZA hearing.

People v. Lopez

253 Cal. App. 2d 377 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 9, 1967

Application of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 . The point that the warning given to defendant did not comply with Miranda v. … rule announced in People v.

People v. Smith

55 Cal. App. 324 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 1921

In Thayer v. … (See People v. Brown, 76 Cal. 573 [ 18 Pac. 678 ], and People v. Wilson, 23 Cal. App. 513, 521 [ 138 Pac. 971 ].) Moreover, the letter was not introduced to show that the couple had previously quarreled.

Cal. Teachers Ass'n v. Vallejo City Unified School Dist.

56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 712 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 2007

Board of Education v. … (See Board of Education v.

California Capital Insurance v. Nielsen

64 Cal. Rptr. 3d 50 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 2007

Co. v. … Co. v.

People v. Arnold CA2/6

California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 2025

(People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 545.) … (People v. Brown, supra, 31 Cal.4th at p. 545.) Moreover, Arnold has not shown he was prejudiced by the trial court’s evidentiary rulings. The People’s case was strong and presented compelling evidence of guilt.

Turner v. Schultz

175 Cal. App. 4th 974 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 2009

(Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 938, 958 [ 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 817 ] (Brown).) … (Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 416-417 [ 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 875 , 926 P.2d 1061 ]; Brown, supra, 168 Cal.App.4th at p. 958 .)

State of California v. Superior Court

98 Cal. App. 3d 643 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1979

Plaintiffs rely primarily on Brown v. Engstrom (1979) 89 Cal. … (Brown v. Engstrom, supra, 89 Cal.App.3d 513, 523-524 .)

People v. Annett

251 Cal. App. 2d 858 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1967

There is no requirement that the information allege commission on board a train. … (People v.

Blye v. Affonso

185 Cal. App. 2d 241 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 1960

Brown in the consolidated case of Brown v. Affonso and the remark of defendants’ counsel set forth in that case, caused the jury to be prejudiced against plaintiff Blye, who ivas Mrs. Brown’s daughter. … Tobriner, J., and Duniway, J., concurred. * This action was consolidated for trial with Brown v. Affonso, 1 Civ. No. 19035, this day decided. See ante, p. 235 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 156 ].

People v. Roe

148 Cal. App. 3d 112 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1983

has been committed to the custody of the Director of Corrections, the court may, within 120 days of the date of commitment on its own motion, or at any time upon the recommendation of the Director of Corrections or the Board … Brown (Gerald), P.J., and Cologne, J., concurred.

Bush v. Superior Court

10 Cal. App. 4th 1374 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1992

(See, e.g., Brown v. Guarantee Ins. Co. (1957) 155 Cal.App.2d 679, 695-696 [ 319 P.2d 69 , 66 A.L.R.2d 1202 ].) … And it is fundamental that the law favors settlements.” ( Brown, supra, 155 Cal.App.2d at pp. 695-696, cited with approval in Comunale v. Traders & General Ins.

Thomas v. Superior Court

22 Cal. App. 3d 972 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 1972

(See also, People v. Brown (1962) 205 Cal. App.2d 188, 193 [ 22 Cal. Rptr. 835 ].) *978 In Abt v. Superior Court (1969) 1 Cal.3d 418 , at page 421 [ 82 Cal. … Rptr. 366 ], disapproved on other grounds in People v. Fein (1971) 4 Cal.3d 747, 755, fn. 3 [ 94 Cal. Rptr. 607 , 484 P.2d 583 ]; People v. Brown (1969) 271 Cal. App.2d 391, 395 [ 76 Cal. Rptr. 568 ]; People v.

Sandoval v. Superior Court

27 Cal. App. 3d 741 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1972

In the light of the governing law as set forth in Adams v. … (See People v. Sirhan, 7 Cal.3d 710, 749-752 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 385 , 497 P.2d 1121 ].)

Anthony v. Snyder

10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 505 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 2004

This court in Presenting Jamul v. Board of Supervisors (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 665, 670-671 [ 282 Cal.Rptr. 564 ], discussed the purpose of section 66499.37. … (Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 866 [ 226 Cal.Rptr. 575 ].)

Western Manufactured Housing Cmty. Assn. v. City of Santa Rosa

California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 2026

In October 2017, then-Governor Jerry Brown declared a state of emergency in Sonoma County due to wildfires. Governor Brown’s order triggered the price gouging protections under section 396. … WE CONCUR: BROWN, P. J.

In Re Marriage of Roesch

83 Cal. App. 3d 96 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1978

On January 1, 1972, husband was elected chairman of the board of directors and president at a base annual salary of $200,000. … Thus, in Addison v.

Scott-Memorial Baptist Church v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control

260 Cal. App. 2d 100 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1968

BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … State Board of Equalization, 60 Cal.2d 441, 456 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 872 , 386 P.2d 496 ]; California State Emp. Assn. v. Trustees of Cal.

Department of Corrections etc. v. W.C.A.B. etc.

California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 2018

(Contra Costa County v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 240 Cal.App.4th at p. 756.) When the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, there is no room for the Board’s interpretation. (DuBois v. Workers’ Comp. … (Brown v. Boren (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1316; accord, e.g., City of Merced v. American Motorists Ins. Co. (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 1316, 1327.)

People v. Geitner

139 Cal. App. 3d 252 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1982

Browning found “per se prejudicial error” under People v. … (People v. Browning, supra, 79 Cal.App.3d 320, 323 .) In People v.