Case law

Keeton v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

94 Cal. App. 2d 307 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1979

In reviewing a decision of the Board, this court must consider the entire record. The decision is only to be upheld if it is based on substantial evidence in the record taken as a whole. (Lab. Code, § 5952; LeVesque v. … Board.

Bernard v. City of Oakland

202 Cal. App. 4th 1553 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2012

(See Hudson v. Board of Administration (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 1310, 1325-1326 [ 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 737 ]; City of Sacramento v. Public Employees Retirement System (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 1470, 1476-1477 [ 280 Cal.Rptr. 847 ].) … Brown (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 1054, 1079, fn. 33 [ 23 Cal.Rptr.2d 819 ], quoting Thornton v.

Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.

55 Cal. App. 2d 158 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1942

(Petrucci v. Heidenreich, 43 Cal.App.2d 561, 562 [ 111 P.2d 421 ].) … (Ehlen v.

San Francisco Design Center Associates v. Portman Companies

41 Cal. App. 4th 29 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1995

Inman Oil Co., Inc. (8th Cir. 1985) 774 F.2d 895, 907 ; Doliner v. Brown (1986) 21 Mass.App. 692 [ 489 N.E.2d 1036, 1039-1040 ].) … (See Hanson v. Fox (1909) 155 Cal. 106, 108 [ 99 P. 489 ]; Armstrong v. Sacramento V. R. Co. (1921) 52 Cal.App. 110, 115 [ 198 P. 217 ].)

Chittem v. Bd., Dir., Vets' Home

88 Cal. App. 795 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1927

The facts in this case are in all essential particulars the same as in the case of McOmie v. Board of Directors of the Veterans' Home of California, ante, p. 16 [ 263 P. 257 ].

Scott v. George A. Fuller Co.

41 Cal. App. 2d 501 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1940

(Davidson v. American Liquid Gas Corp., 32 Cal. App. (2d) 382, 387 [ 89 Pac. (2d) 1103 ], citing Biddlecomb v. Haydon, 4 Cal. App. (2d) 361 [ 40 Pac. (2d) 873 ].) … (Brown v. Board of Trustees, 41 Cal. App. 100 [ 182 Pac. 316 ] ; Gleason v. Fire Protection Engineering Co., 127 Cal. App. 754, 757 [ 16 Pac. (2d) 750 ]; Bruce v. Risley, 15 Cal.

Hart v. County of Los Angeles

151 Cal. App. 2d 271 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1957

Chester v. … (Standard Oil Co. v. J. P. Mills Organization, 3 Cal.2d 128, 132 [ 43 P.2d 797 ] ; Brown v. Copp, 105 Cal.App.2d 1, 6 [ 232 P.2d 868 ].)

People v. Crites

California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 2022

The court denied the motion, stating it lacked the authority to consider the motion under People v. Davis (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1353 and People v. Picklesimer (2010) 48 Cal.4th 330. … BROWN, J. 6 Trial court: Humboldt County Superior Court Trial judge: Honorable Joyce D.

People v. Stenchever

249 Cal. App. 2d 74 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 1967

(People v. Hutcherson, 197 Cal.App.2d 771, 779 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 636 ].) Delivery is not an essential element. (People v. Brown, supra; People v. May, 224 Cal.App.2d 436, 439 [ 36 Cal.Rptr. 715 ] ; People v. … People v.

Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.

80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 60 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1998

(Glaser v. Meyers (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 770, 774 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 242 ].) In Hentzel v. … Co. v. Superior Court (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 867, 875 [ 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 211 ]; Cote v.

People v. Sullivan

255 Cal. App. 2d 232 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1967

The search here is on all fours with that sustained as lawful in People v. Daily, supra (1958) 157 Cal.App.2d 649, 653 . It is also claimed that Brown’s arrest was illegal. … Nor was any objection made in the trial court based on the manner of or cause for Brown’s arrest. Under these circumstances the point is not available on appeal. (People v.

People v. One 1955 Ford Victoria

193 Cal. App. 2d 213 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1961

Officer Brown did not make any kind of a search of the car in letting his eyes fall on the bags that were visible in it. (People v. … Every case, obviously, must be judged on its own facts, but we submit that the facts, held sufficient in People v. Martin (1956), 46 Cal.2d 106 [ 293 P.2d 52 ] and People v.

People v. Costello

107 Cal. App. 2d 514 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1951

(People v. Fewkes, 214 Cal. 142 [ 4 P.2d 538 ].) … (People v. Connolly, 103 Cal.App.2d 245 [ 229 P.2d 112 ].)

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Llewellyn Iron Works

42 Cal. App. 766 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1919

Co. v. McDonald, 112 Ala. 216 , [ 20 South. 472 ]; Brown v. Louisville etc. R. Co., 111 Ala. 275 , [ 19 South. 1001 ]; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Plunkett, 25 Kan. 188 .) … Not even was the presence of the board in the hatchway investigated; nor was the board removed. [6] Notwithstanding the fact that other men than deceased were actually working in this very hatchway at the time, to defendant

People v. Laugenour

25 Cal. App. 44 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1914

(Elliott on Roads and Streets, 3rd ed., p. 147; Brown v. Manning, 6 Ohio, 298, [ 27 Am. Dec. 255 ]; M. E. Church v. Mayor etc. of Hoboken, 33 N. J. L. 13, [ 97 Am. Dec. 697 ]; Oregon City v. … In Smith v.

Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Superior Court

151 Cal. App. 3d 455 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 1984

(Shuffler v. Board of Trustees (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 208, 217 [ 136 Cal.Rptr. 527 ].) The plea that another action is pending may be made either by demurrer or by answer. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (c).) … Co. v. Trinity River Land Co., supra, 105 Cal.App.3d at p. 109 .) A writ of prohibition is an appropriate remedy when the second court refuses to recognize this exclusive jurisdiction. (Browne v.

People v. Bolden

217 Cal. App. 3d 1591 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 20, 1990

(DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 178 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ]; but see Jennings v. … Applying People v. Brown, in People v.

Greenaway v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.

269 Cal. App. 2d 49 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1969

The refusal on the part of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board to award him compensation for his injuries arose as a result of the appeals board’s view of the law applicable to the situation and not because of any conflicting … Com. v.

Guerrieri v. City of Fontana

232 Cal. App. 2d 417 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1965

(City of Anaheim v. City of Fullerton, 102 Cal.App.2d 395 [ 227 P.2d 494 ] ; Johnson v. City of San Pablo, 132 Cal.App.2d 447 [ 283 P.2d 57 ]; American Distilling Co. v. … City Council, 157 Cal.App.2d 441 [ 321 P.2d 97 ], Shepherd v. Board of Supervisors, 137 Cal.App. 421 [ 30 P.2d 578 ], and American Distilling Co. v.

Skidgel v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 2018

(Bedoe v. … Sess.) prepared for Governor Brown (July 10, 1978) p. 1.)