Case law

Jellen v. O'Brien

89 Cal. App. 505 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1928

(Carey v. Brown, 58 Cal., at p. 183.) Appellant urges that he has brought himself within the provisions of both classes of cases, and particularly the first class. … Pomeroy is applicable. ’ ’ The cases of Foreman v. Boyle, 88 Cal. 290 [ 26 Pac. 94 ], and Geurkink v.

People v. Miller

162 Cal. App. 2d 96 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1958

(People v. … (People v. Maddox, 46 Cal.2d 301, 306 [ 294 P.2d 6 ]; People v.

People v. Johnson

242 Cal. App. 2d 870 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1966

(People v. McFarland, 58 Cal.2d 748, 762-763 [ 26 Cal.Rptr. 473 , 376 P.2d 449 ].) … (See People v. Chessman, 38 Cal.2d 166 [ 238 P.2d 1001 ], where victim was moved approximately 22 feet; People v.

People v. Swain

200 Cal. App. 2d 344 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 1962

Brown, 59 Cal. 345, 353 ; People v. Kalkman, 72 Cal. 212, 215 [ 13 P. 500 ]; People v. Dice,, 120 Cal. 189, 201 [ 52 P. 477 ]; People v. Chin Hane, 108 Cal. 597, 604 [ 41 P., 697 ]; People v. … Brown, supra, the court tersely states the rule, “In what a man says against himself he is presumed to speak the truth; but he is not allowed to make evidence for himself. ’ ’ In People v.

Enders v. Apcoa, Inc.

55 Cal. App. 3d 897 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1976

Brooker v. … (See Mosley v.

People v. Simpson

120 Cal. App. 3d 772 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1981

(See also People v. Brown (1980) 107 Cal. App.3d 858, 864, 865 [ 166 Cal. Rptr. 144 ]; People v. Penner (1980) 111 Cal. App.3d 168 [ 168 Cal. … .) *777 The Attorney General urges our result creates an absurd double credit situation such as that referred to in People v. Brown, supra, 107 Cal. App.3d 858, 861-862 .

Schabarum v. California Legislature

60 Cal. App. 4th 1205 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1998

Brown (1978) 20 Cal.3d 765, 780 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 758 , 576 P.2d 473 ]; Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1943) 23 Cal.2d 303, 315 [ 144 P.2d 4 ]). … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ] [italics in original], citing Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v.

People v. Bolden

217 Cal. App. 3d 1591 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 20, 1990

(DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 178 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ]; but see Jennings v. … Applying People v. Brown, in People v.

Fullington v. Equilon Enterprises

210 Cal. App. 4th 667 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 2012

See Kizer v. … The Texas Court of Appeals reached a similar result in Brown v. Dr. Michael D. Hoffman & Assocs. (Tex.App. 2003) 111 S.W.3d 826 (Brown). There, the defendants employed the plaintiff for more than 25 years.

Mosesian v. McClatchy Newspapers

233 Cal. App. 3d 1685 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 13, 1991

Brown, Jr., vetoed a bill to authorize spring horse racing in Fresno due to a lack of community support. … Street v.

NCR Properties v. City of Berkeley

California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 2023

(See Reznitskiy v. … (Realmuto v. Gagnard (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 193, 199; see also Lungren v.

Gross v. Molony

39 Cal. App. 2d 175 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1940

Attached to the petition for the writ as exhibits are copies of two complaints which had been filed with the board and a statement of all the evidence received by the board at the hearing upon the charges. … Petitioner now contends that respondent board is without jurisdiction over naturopaths and has no authority to place him on probation or to revoke his license.

People v. Crites

California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 2022

The court denied the motion, stating it lacked the authority to consider the motion under People v. Davis (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1353 and People v. Picklesimer (2010) 48 Cal.4th 330. … BROWN, J. 6 Trial court: Humboldt County Superior Court Trial judge: Honorable Joyce D.

GameStop, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 2018

(Pitchess v. Superior Court (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 653, 657, citing Singh v. Superior Court (1919) 44 Cal.App. 64, 65-66; see Galli v. Brown (1952) 110 Cal.App.2d 764, 776.) … This does not make the district attorney a party-plaintiff to the action. 10 1154, citing Arwine v. Board of Med.

San Francisco Unified Sch. Dist. v. STATE OF CALIF

131 Cal. App. 3d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 1982

(Lee v. Brown (1976) 18 Cal.3d 110, 114 [ 132 Cal.Rptr. 649 , 553 P.2d 1121 ].) … (Kruelle v. New Castle County Sch. Dist., supra, 642 F.2d 687, 695-696 ; Cox v. Brown (D.D.C. 1980) 498 F.Supp. 823, 827 ; North v.

Keeton v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

94 Cal. App. 2d 307 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1979

In reviewing a decision of the Board, this court must consider the entire record. The decision is only to be upheld if it is based on substantial evidence in the record taken as a whole. (Lab. Code, § 5952; LeVesque v. … Board.

Bernard v. City of Oakland

202 Cal. App. 4th 1553 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2012

(See Hudson v. Board of Administration (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 1310, 1325-1326 [ 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 737 ]; City of Sacramento v. Public Employees Retirement System (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 1470, 1476-1477 [ 280 Cal.Rptr. 847 ].) … Brown (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 1054, 1079, fn. 33 [ 23 Cal.Rptr.2d 819 ], quoting Thornton v.

Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.

55 Cal. App. 2d 158 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1942

(Petrucci v. Heidenreich, 43 Cal.App.2d 561, 562 [ 111 P.2d 421 ].) … (Ehlen v.

San Francisco Design Center Associates v. Portman Companies

41 Cal. App. 4th 29 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 1995

Inman Oil Co., Inc. (8th Cir. 1985) 774 F.2d 895, 907 ; Doliner v. Brown (1986) 21 Mass.App. 692 [ 489 N.E.2d 1036, 1039-1040 ].) … (See Hanson v. Fox (1909) 155 Cal. 106, 108 [ 99 P. 489 ]; Armstrong v. Sacramento V. R. Co. (1921) 52 Cal.App. 110, 115 [ 198 P. 217 ].)

Chittem v. Bd., Dir., Vets' Home

88 Cal. App. 795 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1927

The facts in this case are in all essential particulars the same as in the case of McOmie v. Board of Directors of the Veterans' Home of California, ante, p. 16 [ 263 P. 257 ].