Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

2.07s

  • American Friends Service Committee v. Procunier

    33 Cal. App. 3d 252 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 3, 1973

    Harney, Inc. v. Contractors’ Board (1952) 39 Cal.2d 561, 564 [ 247 P.2d 913 ]; Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Cal. … Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ].) * Retired judge of the superior court sitting under assignment by the Chairman of the Judicial Council.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Most v. First National Bank of San Diego

    246 Cal. App. 2d 425 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1966

    Proc., § 1091; Steiger v. Board of Supervisors, 143 Cal.App.2d 352 [ 300 P.2d 210 ]; State ex rel. Theile v. Cities Service Co., 31 Del. 514 [ 115 A. 773, 774 ].) . … (Wheeler v. Oppenheimer, 140 Cal.App.2d 497, 501 [ 295 P.2d 128 ].) An allegation that one’s purposes are not legitimate, or are illegitimate, must also be classed as a conclusion. The judgment is affirmed. Brown, P.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People v. Nero

    181 Cal. App. 4th 504 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 2010

    .— INTRODUCTION In People v. … (People v. Woods (1992) 8 Cal.App.4th 1570, 1577 [ 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 231 ]; accord, People v. Hart (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 662 [ 97 Cal.Rptr.3d 827 ].)

    Cited 161 timesPublished
  • Watkins v. Wachovia Corp.

    172 Cal. App. 4th 1576 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 2009

    Bank v. … (Kagan v. Gibraltar Sav. & Loan Assn., supra, 35 Cal.3d at p. 596 ; La Sala v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Livingston v. Marie Callenders, Inc.

    72 Cal. App. 4th 830 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1999

    Board of Supervisors (1947) 31 Cal.2d 66, 70 [ 187 P.2d 686 ], disapproved on another point in Bailey v. County of Los Angeles (1956) 46 Cal.2d 132, 139 [ 293 P.2d 449 ]; Fidelity Mortgage Trustee Service, Inc. v. … In particular, we were guided by our prior decision in Brown [v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McKamy v. Bd. of Tr. of Bakersfield

    26 Cal. App. 315 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 1915

    The proceeding is brought against the board of trustees of the city of Bakersfield; neither the court which rendered the decree, nor Dorris, the relator, being made a party herein. … See Camron v. Kenfield, 57 Cal. 550 ; Farmers’ Union v. Thresher, 62 Cal. 410 and Hobart v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Warren v. State Personnel Bd.

    94 Cal. App. 3d 95 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1979

    (Vielehr v. State Personnel Bd. (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 187, 192 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 852 ]. See also Morrison v. State Board of Education (1969) 1 Cal.3d 214, 220-221 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 461 P.2d 375 ]; Shepherd v. … State Personnel Board (1957) 48 Cal.2d 41, 51 [ 307 P.2d 4 ].) In Morrison v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Jacobson v. County of Los Angeles

    69 Cal. App. 3d 374 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1977

    [Citations.]’ ” (Brown v. World Church, 272 Cal.App.2d 684, 690-691 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 669 , 45 A.L.R.3d 622 ].) Despite this omission on petitioners’ part, we have examined the evidence. … (See Johnston v. Board of Supervisors (1947) 31 Cal.2d 66, 74 [ 187 P.2d 686 ]; Kappadahl v. Alcan Pacific Co. (1963) 222 Cal.App.2d 626, 634 [ 35 Cal.Rptr. 354 ].)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kuo v. Dublin Unified School Dist.

    California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 2025

    Shaw, Letter to Governor Brown, re Sen. Bill No. 1427 (June 23, 1959).) … (Prang v. Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals Board (2024) 15 Cal.5th 1152, 1170.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Meanley v. McColgan

    49 Cal. App. 2d 203 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1942

    In Van Wart v. Commissioner, 295 U. S. 112 [ 55 S. Ct. 660 , 79 L. … In this case the commissioner and Circuit Court of Appeals had held the expenditure personal, while the Board of Tax Appeals had held it deductible as a business expense. Higgins v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hinman v. Department of Personnel Administration

    167 Cal. App. 3d 516 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1985

    (Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855, 861 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ].) … (Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of California (1969) 71 Cal.2d 566, 578 [ 79 Cal.Rptr. 77 , 456 P.2d 645 , 38 A.L.R.3d 1194 ]; Darcy v. Mayor etc. of San Jose (1894) 104 Cal. 642, 645-646 [ 38 P. 500 ].)” (Brown v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Neal v. Gatlin

    35 Cal. App. 3d 871 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1973

    (See also Hopper v. Allen, supra, 266 Cal. App.2d 797 .) In Meester v. … Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Gargano, J., concurred.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Union Trust Co. v. Dickinson

    30 Cal. App. 91 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1916

    (See Johnston v. Santa Clara County, 28 Cal. 547 ; Daley v. … (Browne on Statute of Frauds, sec. 372.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fierro v. State Bd. of Control

    191 Cal. App. 3d 735 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1987

    (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; California Teachers Assn. v. … Honey Springs Homeowners Assn. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • People v. Mason

    259 Cal. App. 2d 30 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 1968

    We think, also, that Brown is irreconcilable with our own holding in Molano . … In Board of Education v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Valdez v. Federal Mutual Insurance

    272 Cal. App. 2d 223 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1969

    Go. v. Brown, supra. … Co. v. Brown, 63 Cal.2d 508 . . . ; Hendricks v. Meritplan Ins. Co., 205 Cal.App.2d 133 . . . ).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Bell v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.

    40 Cal. App. 3d 16 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1974

    Margaret Brown, about 20 to 28 men in all. All the men on board the launch were drinking and talking. When the launch stopped by the S.S. … (Dixon v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Katz v. Superior Court

    73 Cal. App. 3d 952 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1977

    State Board of Medical Examiners (1960) 180 Cal.App.2d 760, 766-773 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 910 ]. Cf. Old Dearborn Co. v. … (See Giaccio v. Pennsylvania, supra, 382 U.S. 399, 402 [ 15 L.Ed.2d 447, 449 ] and Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, 1 Cal.3d 214, 231 .) In Groyned v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bareilles v. State Water Resource Control Board CA1/1

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 2025

    Filed 11/17/25 Bareilles v. … (Le Strange v. City of Berkeley (1962) 210 Cal.App.2d 313, 323; see also Alborzi v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sugarman v. Benett

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 2021

    (Sugarman v. Brown, supra, B308318.) Here, we reach the same conclusion with respect to the Form 8-K and Form 10-Q filings at issue. … Brown Electrical Contractor, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.