Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.81s

  • In Re Goetz

    46 Cal. App. 2d 848 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 1941

    (People v. Wallach, supra; People v. Roberts, 136 Cal.App. 709 [29 PaCal.2d 432].) … Ex parte Green, supra, was distinguished from those cases in which sentences were pronounced after convictions for violations of the provisions of the Penal Code in People v. Brown, 113 Cal. 35 [ 45 P. 181 ].

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Aguiar

    257 Cal. App. 2d 597 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1968

    (See also Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477, 490 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ].) The foregoing rationale was stated in People v. … River Port Pilot Comrs., 330 U.S. 552, 556 [ 91 L.Ed. 1093, 1096 , 67 S.Ct. 910 ]; Brown v. *605 Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 [ 98 L.Ed. 873, 881 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 38 A.L.R.2d 1180 ].)

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Maddern v. Superior Court

    22 Cal. App. 3d 998 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1972

    (Scott v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, p. 83.) In Taylor v. … See also Jones v. Brown (1970) 13 Cal.App.3d 513, 520-521 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 651 ].)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Cordova

    248 Cal. App. 4th 543 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 2016

    Brown, at p. 319, quoting Evangelatos v. … (E.g., Board of Prison Terms v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • American Friends Service Committee v. Procunier

    33 Cal. App. 3d 252 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 3, 1973

    Harney, Inc. v. Contractors’ Board (1952) 39 Cal.2d 561, 564 [ 247 P.2d 913 ]; Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Cal. … Brown (1966) 63 Cal.2d 841, 845 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 409 P.2d 689 ].) * Retired judge of the superior court sitting under assignment by the Chairman of the Judicial Council.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • People v. Rajanayagam

    211 Cal. App. 4th 42 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 2012

    (People v. … (People v.

    Cited 213 timesPublished
  • Siegel v. Fife

    234 Cal. App. 4th 988 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 2015

    (Burch v. George (1994) 7 Cal.4th 246, 254; see Tunstall v. Wells (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 554, 561 [same]; see § 21102, subd. … Brown’s care. And section 21400 provides that if Ms. Brown’s plan “would be defeated by abatement,” the shares of beneficiaries are reduced as necessary to effectuate the 2005 trust’s plan or purpose. (See Valentine v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Coit Ranch, Inc.

    204 Cal. App. 2d 52 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 1962

    State Personnel Board, 22 Cal.2d 198, 200 [ 137 P.2d 433 ] ; Clark v. State Personnel Board, 61 Cal.App.2d 800 [ 144 P.2d 84 ] ; Child v. State Personnel Board, 97 Cal.App.2d 467 [ 218 P.2d 52 ] ; United States v. … County of Los Angeles, 24 Cal.2d 267, 272 [ 148 P.2d 645 ]; Floresta, Inc. v. City Council, 190 Cal.App.2d 599, 612 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 182 ]). Nor do the cases of State Board of Dry Cleaners v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Leonard Corp. v. City of San Diego

    210 Cal. App. 2d 547 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1962

    Board of Supervisors, 170 Cal.App.2d 619 [ 339 P.2d 914 ]; Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court, 16 Cal.2d 516 [ 106 P.2d 879 ] ; Orange County Water Dist. v. … See also Braun v. Brown, 13 Cal.2d 130 [ 87 P.2d 1009 ].

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Talmo v. Civil Service Commission

    231 Cal. App. 3d 210 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 14, 1991

    (Barber v. *227 State Personnel Bd. (1976) 18 Cal.3d 395, 404 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 206 , 556 P.2d 306 ]; Brown v. Gordon (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 659, 666 [ 49 Cal.Rptr. 901 ].) … (Accord: Brown v. Gordon, supra, 240 Cal.App.2d 667 ; Schmitt v. City of Rialto (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 494, 501 [ 210 Cal.Rptr. 788 ]; Chodur v.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Most v. First National Bank of San Diego

    246 Cal. App. 2d 425 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1966

    Proc., § 1091; Steiger v. Board of Supervisors, 143 Cal.App.2d 352 [ 300 P.2d 210 ]; State ex rel. Theile v. Cities Service Co., 31 Del. 514 [ 115 A. 773, 774 ].) . … (Wheeler v. Oppenheimer, 140 Cal.App.2d 497, 501 [ 295 P.2d 128 ].) An allegation that one’s purposes are not legitimate, or are illegitimate, must also be classed as a conclusion. The judgment is affirmed. Brown, P.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Connell v. Superior Court of Sacramento County

    59 Cal. App. 4th 382 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 1997

    under County of Los Angeles v. … (Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 724 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 708 , 771 P.2d 406 ].) To determine intent, we look first to the words themselves. (Ibid.)

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Abney v. State Dept. of Health Care Services

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 2024

    (See Cassidy v. California Board of Accountancy (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 620, 627.) … (See maj. opn. of Brown, J. and the conc. opn. of Mosk, J., in Yamaha, [supra,] 19 Cal.4th [at p. 15] [citing, e.g., Wilkinson v. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hanna v. Rodeo-Vallejo Ferry Co.

    89 Cal. App. 462 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 1928

    (Brown v. Wrightman, 5 Cal. App. 391 [ 90 Pac. 467 ]; Los Angeles etc. Land Co. v. Marr, 187 Cal. 126, 133 [ 200 Pac. 1051 ]; 18 C. J. 377; City of Barnesville v. Stafford, 161 Ga. 588 [43 A. L. R. 1050, 131 S. … E. 487 ]; Brown v. Huber, 80 Ohio St. 183 [28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 709, 88 N. E. 322 ].) The complaint, verified by plaintiff Thomas R.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Civilian Conserv. Corps Camp Interest Group v. Valley Center Pauma Unified School Dist. CA4/1

    California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 2014

    (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564.) … Because only the latter type of conduct comprises a "meeting" within the ambit of the Brown Act (see Frazer v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Seto v. Szeto

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 2022

    In the second, the court in Brown v. … (See, e.g., Brown & Bryant, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cain v. Marquez

    31 Cal. App. 2d 430 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1939

    v. … In By an v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • DeRose v. Heurlin

    122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 630 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 2002

    Seeking Heurlin’s reciprocating commitment to “a cordial and professional relationship,” Brown enclosed in his letter a copy of the Code of Professionalism of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), assuring Heurlin … Cobb Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Far West Services, Inc. v. Livingston

    156 Cal. App. 3d 931 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1984

    (Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855, 861 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ].) … (Brown v. Merlo, supra, 8 Cal.3d 855, 861 ; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ].)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Magliulo v. Superior Court

    47 Cal. App. 3d 760 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1975

    of the Board should be affirmed.” (7 Cal.3cl at p. 972.) … Brown, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d 513, 521 ; Azevedo v. Abel, supra, 264 Cal.App.2d 451, 460 ; and Carter v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.