Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.03s

  • Berjikian v. Franchise Tax Board CA2/7

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 2015

    (See Saleeby, supra, 39 Cal.3d at p. 564, quoting Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … Therefore, we limit our following discussion to the Pharmacy Board’s suspension of Enna’s pharmacist’s license. (See Paterno v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Southern Check Exchange v. County of San Diego

    5 Cal. App. 3d 81 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 1970

    Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 37 Cal.2d 696 [ 235 P.2d 7 ].) It is further true that Southern has not shown it took any action to its detriment as the result of the misinformation. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Ault, J., concurred.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Citizens for a Green San Mateo v. San Mateo County Community College District

    226 Cal. App. 4th 1572 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 2014

    Monterey County Water Resources Agency (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 961, 965; accord, Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 830, 836; Oceanside Marina Towers Assn. v. … Prior to the November 17, 2010 public meeting, the District, as required by the Brown Act (Gov.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • C.T. v. Kern County Board of Education CA5

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 2025

    Filed 1/8/25 C.T. v. … (See In re Bode (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1002, 1004; Mountain Defense League v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 65 Cal.App.3d 723, 727–730.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Gardiner Solder Co. v. SupAlloy Corp., Inc.

    232 Cal. App. 3d 1537 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 1991

    (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) “ ‘A court should interpret legislation reasonably . . . *1542 to give effect to the apparent purpose of the statute.’ [Citations.]” … (See e.g., Lucky Auto Supply v. Turner, supra, 244 Cal.App.2d 872 .) 3 “Only a valid and binding contract may be rescinded.” (Chas. Brown & Sons v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Schenk v. Hospice of San Luis Obispo County, Inc.

    96 Cal. App. 3d 571 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1979

    (e), 9500) and the board is responsible to the membership. (Corp. Code, §§ 9301, 9402, 9601, 9602.) … Bk. v. Cooper (1944) 62 Cal.App.2d 653 [ 145 P.2d 722 ].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bernstein v. Smutz

    83 Cal. App. 2d 108 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1947

    (Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 [ 38 A.L.R. 1479 , 234 P. 381 ]; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 497 [ 234 P. 388 ].) … (Croxton v. State, 186 Okla. 249 [ 97 P.2d 11, 19 ]; Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 126 Tex. 296 [ 83 S.W.2d 935 , 87 S.W.2d 1069 , 99 A.L.R. 1107 ].)

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Mize v. Crail

    29 Cal. App. 3d 797 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 4, 1973

    As the court stated in Davey v. … In Witaschek v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Cabanne

    223 Cal. App. 3d 199 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1990

    In most of the instances referred to in Brown v. … Code, § 27433); Brown v. Overshiner, supra, 38 Cal.2d at p. 432 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Cagle

    21 Cal. App. 3d 57 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1971

    He first stated he saw a jar full of seeds and greenish-brown leafy material which resembled marijuana. The jar was lying in the defendant’s purse which was on the kitchen counter next to a large brown paper bag. … (Cohen v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Mateo-Woodburn v. Fresno Community Hospital & Medical Center

    221 Cal. App. 3d 1169 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1990

    Opinion BROWN (G. … In Blank v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Mayor v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd. etc.

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 2024

    (See Abelleira v. … BROWN, P. J. WE CONCUR: STREETER, J. GOLDMAN, J. Mayor v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Williams7/1/14 CA2/4

    227 Cal. App. 4th 733 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 2014

    The Board of Prison Terms may consider these findings when determining defendant’s release date. … (Id. at p. 1251; see also People v.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Arroyo v. Regents of University of California

    48 Cal. App. 3d 793 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1975

    Perry v. Sindermann (1972) 408 U.S. 593 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 570 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 ]; Bekiaris v. Board of Education (1972) 6 Cal.3d 575 [ 100 Cal. Rptr. 16 , 493 P.2d 480 ].) … Draper, P.J., and Brown (H.C.), J., concurred.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pierson v. Babb-Free

    60 Cal. App. 2d 436 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1997

    [Citations.]” ’ ” (Estate of Davis (1940) 38 Cal.App.2d 579, 584 [ 102 P.2d 545 ], as quoted in Brown v. Brown, supra, 274 Cal.App.2d at p. 189 , original italics.) … (Brown v. Brown, supra, 274 Cal.App.2d at p. 190.) Brown involved an invalid foreign divorce. The first wife waited almost 30 years before asserting a claim against property accumulated by Mr. Brown and his second wife.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Otay River Constructors v. San Diego Expressway

    70 Cal. Rptr. 3d 434 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 2008

    the decision of the Disputes Board and that the party prevailing at arbitration would be entitled to attorney fees for that work, but not for the earlier Disputes Board process. … For example, if the Disputes Board finally resolves a dispute, the dispute would not proceed to arbitration and the Disputes Board would decide the attorney fee issue.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Tannenbaum v. Superior Court

    115 Cal. App. 2d 394 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1953

    The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650 [ 245 P.2d 633 ], applying Statutes of 1871, page 319, was not here violated. … (See, generally, In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82 [ 59 P.2d 213 ]; United States v. Price, 163 F. 904 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Fain

    139 Cal. App. 3d 295 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1983

    State Social Welfare Board (1961) 193 Cal.App.2d 708, 719 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 776 ]; Hasselbach v. Dept. Alcoholic Bev. Control (1959) 167 Cal.App.2d 662, 665 [ 334 P.2d 1058 ]; People v. … Brown (1975) 14 Cal.3d 571, 573 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 231 , 536 P.2d 1017 ] [conditional right to counsel exists at parole rescission hearings].)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • People v. Rios

    205 Cal. App. 3d 833 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1988

    (See Texas v. Brown, supra, 460 U.S. at pp. 743-744 [75 L.Ed.2d at pp. 514-515]; People v. Williams, supra, 198 Cal.App.3d at p. 890 .) Relying on People v. … (Texas v. Brown, supra, 460 U.S. at p. 730 [ 75 L.Ed.2d at p. 503 ].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • County of Ventura v. Public Employment Relations Bd.

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 2019

    (b), 3541.3; Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board (2018) 5 Cal.5th 898, 911 (Boling).) … (United Public Employees v. Public Employment Relations Bd. (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1119, 1128, adopting the federal test in NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. (3d Cir. 1982) 691 F.2d 1117, 1124.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.