Case law

Miller v. Bakersfield News-Bulletin, Inc.

44 Cal. App. 3d 899 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 1975

(Yorty v. Chandler, 13 Cal.App.3d 467 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 709 ].) … As is said in Yorty v. Chandler, supra, at page 472: “ . . .

Gensler v. Board of Trustees etc. CA4/3

California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 2025

Filed 11/3/25 Gensler v. Board of Trustees etc. … (See Pinter-Brown v.

People v. Humphrey

27 Cal. App. 2d 631 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 20, 1938

Eunice Brown testified that she consulted Dr. … Again, in People v.

Pettitt v. City of Fresno

34 Cal. App. 3d 813 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1973

The board has then no power to grant such permit until the ordinance is amended through proper legislative procedure. (Johnston v. Board of Supervisors, 31 Cal.2d 66, 74 [ 187 P.2d 686 ].) … Even an express permit granted by the board contrary to the terms of the ordinance would be of no effect (Johnston v. Board of Supervisors, supra; Magruder v. City of Redwood, 203 Cal. 665, 674-675 [ 265 P. 806 ]).

Kern County Hospital Authority v. Public Employment Relations Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 2024

(Boling v. Public Employee Relations Board (2018) 5 Cal.5th 898, 911 (Boling).) … The Board cited Deaton Truck Line, Inc. v.

Oakland Unified School Dist. v. Pub. Employment Relations Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 2025

In 1961, the Legislature adopted the George Brown Act (Brown Act) (former § 3500 et seq.) … Oakland Unified School District v. Public Employment Relations Board (A171007) 54 Oakland Unified School District v.

In Re Gatts

79 Cal. App. 3d 1023 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1978

(See, e.g., Brown v. Wainwright, supra, 419 F.2d 1376, 1377 .) … In Akin v. Board of Education of Riverside etc.

Berry v. Berry

216 Cal. App. 3d 1155 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1989

Henn v. … In Casas v.

TransparentGov Novato v. City of Novato

California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 2019

(Common Cause v. … This categorically rules out future disputes about the applicability of the Brown Act’s exceptions to any such discussion. (Cf. Shapiro v.

Sparks v. Lauritzen

248 Cal. App. 2d 269 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 1967

(Notten v. Mensing, 3 Cal.2d 469, 471 [ 45 P.2d 198 ].) … J., and Brown (H. C.), J., concurred. Appellants’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 29, 1967.

Hartnett v. San Diego County Office of Education

California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 2017

Brown open meetings act (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.). … (Accord, Roberts v. City of Palmdale, at p. 376 [Brown Act was intended to apply to collective action of local governing boards and not to the passive receipt by individuals of their mail]; Frazer v.

Harman v. City and County of San Francisco

39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 589 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 2006

(Smith v. Chicago School Reform Bd. Of Trustees (7th Cir. 1999) 165 F.3d 1142, 1149 ; see Board of Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, supra, at p. 403.) … (Board of Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, supra, 520 U.S. 397 ; Jett v. Dallas Independent School Dist. (1989) 491 U.S. 701 [ 105 L.Ed.2d 598 , 109 S.Ct. 2702 ]; Canton v.

Keller v. City of Los Angeles

123 Cal. App. 99 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 1932

(Blake v. City of Eureka, 201 Cal. 643 [ 258 Pac. 945 ]; Farley v. Reindollar et al., 174 Cal. 703, 707 [ 165 Pac. 19 ]; McGarry v. Ellis, 54 Cal. App. 622 [ 202 Pac. 463 ]; Harney v. … Brown, 76 Cal. 318 [ 18 Pac. 373 ], wherein it is held that the failure to assess all the property in the assessment district renders the assessment void. In Larsen v.

Ogden Entertainment Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

233 Cal. App. 4th 970 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 2014

Filed 12/31/14 Ogden Entertainment Services v. … (People v.

DPR Construction v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board CA3

California Court of Appeal · May 16, 2025

ADJ11348013) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and ALONZO MCCLANAHAN, Respondents. … (Telles Transport, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 1159, 1163 (Telles).) We review the board’s interpretation of its governing statutes de novo. (Alvarez v. Workers’ Comp.

Ford v. Lou Kum Shu

26 Cal. App. 203 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 1914

. *207 The hired laborers were to board at Covey’s home on the farm, and Covey, in paying them their wages each month, was to and did deduct therefrom the amount which they were to pay for their board, varying, during the … W. 686 ] ; Brown v. Cone, 80 App. Div. 413 , [ 81 N. Y. Supp. 89 ]; Lawall v. Groman, 180 Pa. St. 532, [ 57 Am. St. Rep. 662 , 37 Atl. 98 ] ; Garber v. Blatchley, 51 W. Va. 147 , [ 41 S. E. 222 ]; New Home S. M. Co. v.

Benson v. Kwikset Corp.

152 Cal. App. 4th 1254 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 2007

(People v. Moroney (1944) 24 Cal.2d 638, 642-643 [ 150 P.2d 888 ]; Brown v. … Governing Board (1994) 8 Cal.4th 333, 340 [ 33 *1286 Cal.Rptr.2d 109 , 878 P.2d 1321 ]; Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1325, 1334, fn. 7 [ 283 Cal.Rptr. 893 , 813 P.2d 240 ]; County of Sacramento v.

Williams v. Superior Court

230 Cal. App. 4th 636 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 14, 2014

(Valdivia v. Brown (E.D.Cal. 2013) 956 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1126 (Valdivia III).) … In Valdivia v. Brown (E.D.Cal. 2012, No. CIV S-94-671 LKK/GGH) 2012 U.S. Dist.

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. County of Los Angeles

49 Cal. App. 3d 356 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1975

In 1968 the state enacted the Meyer-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov. … Agreements concerning any matters within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Board of Supervisors or concerning any matters not otherwise delegated by the Board shall become binding when executed by the Board of Supervisors

Moltzen v. State Personnel Board CA3

California Court of Appeal · Feb 23, 2021

Filed 2/22/21 Moltzen v. … (b); Fisher v. State Personnel Bd. (2018) 25 Cal.App.5th 1, 13.) B.