Case law

Santa Barbara County Fire Fighters v. County of Santa Barbara

121 Cal. App. 3d 521 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 1981

(Logan v. Forster (1954) 123 Cal.App.2d 31, 33 [ 265 P.2d 961 ]; Beresford v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. (1954) 128 Cal.App.2d 448, 449 [ 275 P.2d 525 ]; Smith v. Smith (1969) 1 Cal.App.3d 952, 957 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 282 ].) … Defendants are the county, the county board of supervisors, and other county officials.

Yong Shao Ma v. City & County of San Francisco

115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 544 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2002

John Brown. Dr. … McMahan’s opinion that the medicines he has on board his paramedic unit “would have started her up.”

Pacific Legal Foundation v. UNEMPLOYMENT INS. APP.

74 Cal. App. 3d 150 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1977

Brown, Jr., urging support for the bill. … Campbell v. Board of Dental Examiners (1975) 53 Cal. App.3d 283, 286, fn. 3 [ 125 Cal. Rptr. 694 ].)

Tuckwell v. State Personnel Board CA1/1

California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 2015

Filed 6/25/15 Tuckwell v. … The ALJ 22 prepares a proposed decision which the Board may adopt or reject in whole or in part. (Gov. Code, § 19582, subd. (b); California Youth Authority v.

In Re Marriage of Bruegl

47 Cal. App. 3d 201 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 1975

(Bensing v. … Board of Administration, 3 Cal.3d 32, 41, fn. 8 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ]), later cases implicitly reject this. In Smith v.

Prof. Engineers in Cal. Government v. Brown CA1/3

California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 2015

Government v. … BROWN, as the Governor etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

SUTCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Modesto High School Dist.

208 Cal. App. 3d 1220 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1989

(Brougher v. Board of Public Works (1928) 205 Cal. 426, 435 [ 271 P. 487 ]; Russian Hill Improvement Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1967) 66 Cal.2d 34, 39-40 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 672 , 423 P.2d 824 ].) … Ardaiz, J., and Brown (G.

Kirkpatrick v. Damianakes

15 Cal. App. 2d 446 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1936

It is owned by the board of education of the city and county of San Francisco. Said board leased the entire property to the Wise Realty Company which in turn assigned the lease to the Lincoln Realty Company. … (Spore v. Washington, 96 Cal. App. 345 [ 274 Pac. 407 ]; Brown v. Pepperdine, 53 Cal. App. 334 [ 200 Pac. 36 ]; Runyon v. City of Los Angeles, 40 Cal. App. 383 [ 180 Pac. 837 ].)

Goldberg v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIF.

248 Cal. App. 2d 867 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1967

Linde, Constitutional Bights in the Public Sector, 40 Washington Law Review 10. 10 In Brown v. … The United States Supreme Court's observation in Brown v.

Hartnett v. San Diego County Office of Education

California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 2017

Brown open meetings act (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.). … (Accord, Roberts v. City of Palmdale, at p. 376 [Brown Act was intended to apply to collective action of local governing boards and not to the passive receipt by individuals of their mail]; Frazer v.

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. County of Los Angeles

49 Cal. App. 3d 356 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1975

In 1968 the state enacted the Meyer-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov. … Agreements concerning any matters within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Board of Supervisors or concerning any matters not otherwise delegated by the Board shall become binding when executed by the Board of Supervisors

Frost v. State of California

247 Cal. App. 2d 378 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1966

Until 1963, section 342 provided: “Actions on claims against a county, which have been rejected by the board of supervisors, must be commenced within six months after the first rejection thereof by such Board.” … Brown, P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred. A petition for a rehearing was denied January 6, 1967, and appellants’ petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied February 15, 1967.

San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San Francisco

229 Cal. App. 4th 498 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 2014

(Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 862.) … Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1915) 239 U.S. 441, 446 (Bi-Metallic) [distinguishing Londoner v.

Allen v. San Francisco Wholesale Dairy Produce Exchange

59 Cal. App. 93 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1922

(Brown v. Rouse, 104 Cal. 672, 676 [ 38 Pac. 507 ]; Hall v. Wells, 24 Cal. App. 238, 250 [ 141 Pac. 53 ]; Munroe v. Fette, 1 Cal. App. 333, 334 [ 82 Pac. 206 ]; Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. … Krug, 89 Cal. 237 [ 26 Pac. 902 ]; Dupont v. Wertheman, 10 Cal. 354 ; Billings v. Morrow, 7 Cal. 171, 175 [ 68 Am. Dec. 235 ]; Hutchinson v. Scott, 35 Cal. App. 171, 174 [ 169 Pac. 415 ]; Brown v. Wrightman, 5 Cal.

Kuhs v. Superior Court

201 Cal. App. 3d 966 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1988

In Ley v. … (Geiger v. Board of Supervisors (1957) 48 Cal.2d 832, 839 [ 313 P.2d 545 ]; Beck v. Piatt, supra, 24 Cal.App.3d at p. 616 .)

Ghafur v. Bernstein

32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 626 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 2005

Dist. (10th Cir. 1985) 777 F.2d 1403 , 1408 [school board members are public officials]; Strong v. Oklahoma Pub. Co. (Okla. Civ. App. 1995) 899 P.2d 1185, 1188 [school board vice-president is public official]; Scott v. … (Rosenblatt v. Baer, supra, 383 U.S. at pp. 85-87, fn. 13.) “[Education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments.” (Brown v.

Arnold v. La Belle Oil Co.

47 Cal. App. 290 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1920

Rep. 132 , [ 62 Pac. 552 ]; Pacific Bank v. Stone, 121 Cal. 202 , [53 Pac. 634]; Blood v. La Serena etc. Co., 113 Cal. 221 , [ 41 Pac. 1017 , 45 Pac. 252 ]; Salfield v. Sutter etc. … (Brown v. Mason, 155 Cal. 155 , [21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 328, 99 Pac. 867 ]; Boland v. Ashurst Oil etc. Co., 145 Cal. 405 , [ 78 Pac. 871 ]; Levy v. Wolf, 2 Cal. App. 491 , [ 84 Pac. 313 ]; Justy v. Erro, 16 Cal.

Zander v. Texaco, Inc.

259 Cal. App. 2d 793 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 1968

(Granco Steel, Inc. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board (1968) 68 Cal.2d 191, 197 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 287 , 436 P.2d 287 ].) … Appeals Board, supra, at p. 197; Parlier Fruit Co. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. (1957) 151 Cal.App.2d 6, 19-20 [ 311 P.2d 62 ].) Oral binders are described as “a common and necessary part of the insurance business.”

City of San Diego v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local 127

8 Cal. App. 3d 308 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1970

Union, Local No. 513 v. Smith, 194 Kan. 2 [ 397 P.2d 357, 359-360 ]; Board of Education v. Redding, 32 Ill.2d 567 [ 207 N.E.2d 427, 430 ]; State Board of Regents v. United Packing House etc. … (Gen. see Nutter v. City of Santa Monica, supra, 74 Cal.App.2d 292, 297-298 ; Norwalk Teachers' Assn. v. Board of Education, supra, 138 Conn. 269 [ 83 A.2d 482 ]; State Board of Regents v. United Packing House etc.

NJD, LTD. v. City of San Dimas

2 Cal. Rptr. 3d 818 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 2003

In Brown v. … (Brown v. Legal Foundation of Wash., supra, 123 S.Ct. at p. 1418 ; Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, supra, 535 U.S. at p. 322 .) But in Lucas v.