Case law

Pacific Legal Foundation v. UNEMPLOYMENT INS. APP.

74 Cal. App. 3d 150 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1977

Brown, Jr., urging support for the bill. … Campbell v. Board of Dental Examiners (1975) 53 Cal. App.3d 283, 286, fn. 3 [ 125 Cal. Rptr. 694 ].)

Watson v. Superior Court

176 Cal. App. 4th 1407 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 2009

The foregoing construction of section 2239, subdivision (a) would contravene the fundamental principles of statutory interpretation that require us to ascertain legislative intent (Brown v. … (Shea v. Board of Medical Examiners (1978) 81 Cal.App.3d 564, 574 [ 146 Cal.Rptr. 653 ].)

Diagnostic Data, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Bd.

34 Cal. App. 3d 556 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 1973

Co. v. Feinsten (1940) 15 Cal.2d 413, 423 [ 181 P.2d 696 , 131 A.L.R. 608 ].) The criminal cases relied on by appellant are not in point. (See People v. … Appeals Board (1965) 236 Cal.App.2d 325, 338, 340 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 892 ]), and the principles of appellate review of rulings of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (see General Motors Corp. v. Cal.

Midway Orchards v. County of Butte

220 Cal. App. 3d 765 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1990

(Hill v. Board of Supervisors (1917) 176 Cal. 84, 86 [ 167 P. 514 ].) … Calwa County Water Dist. (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 741, 746 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 223 ] [county clerk presumed to have given required notice to freeholders in district prior to hearing on abandonment of alley]; Brown v.

Buller v. Buller

62 Cal. App. 2d 694 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 1944

Buller and the boy lived there together for six months, paying no board. Then Mr. … In the ease of Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1, 3 [ 147 P. 1168 ], it is stated: “Where the final decree of divorce makes no disposition of the community property, the parties become tenants in common of such property.

Santa Barbara County Fire Fighters v. County of Santa Barbara

121 Cal. App. 3d 521 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 1981

(Logan v. Forster (1954) 123 Cal.App.2d 31, 33 [ 265 P.2d 961 ]; Beresford v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. (1954) 128 Cal.App.2d 448, 449 [ 275 P.2d 525 ]; Smith v. Smith (1969) 1 Cal.App.3d 952, 957 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 282 ].) … Defendants are the county, the county board of supervisors, and other county officials.

Krouzian v. Hagopian

167 Cal. App. 2d 251 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1959

See Bastajian v. … See Morgan v. State Board of Equalization (1949), 89 Cal.App.2d 674, 677 [ 201 P.2d 859 ], holding that the trial court may correct a clerical error without notice and on ex parte application.

San Diego Municipal Employees Assoc. v. City of San Diego

244 Cal. App. 4th 906 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 2016

.; its board manages and administers the City's retirement system. (Lexin v. Superior Court (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1050, 1063.) … (California Licensed Foresters Assn. v.

Mills Sales Co. v. Gonzales

146 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 899 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1956

(Morgan v. State Board of Equalization, 89 Cal.App.2d 674, 677 [ 201 P.2d 859 ] and cases therein cited.) … (Morgan v. State Board of Equalization, supra, at p. 682.) (Italics supplied.)

Balch Enterprises, Inc. v. New Haven Unified School District

219 Cal. App. 3d 783 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1990

(Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Air Resources Board (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 789, 794 [ 180 Cal.Rptr. 550 ]; Sierra Club v. City of Hayward (1981) 28 Cal. 3d 840, 848-849 [ 171 Cal.Rptr. 619 , 623 P.2d 180 ]; Strumsky v. … (Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 866 [ 226 Cal.Rptr. 575 ].) We will inquire whether the memorandum and report satisfy the statutory requirements.

Sevey v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF ST. ETC. EMPLOYEES

48 Cal. App. 3d 64 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1975

Its holding that the board could ignore the no-raiding clause was limited to that “narrow factual situation.” ( Weyerhaeuser, supra, 276 F.2d -865, 875.) … In one of them, Clark v.

Yong Shao Ma v. City & County of San Francisco

115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 544 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2002

John Brown. Dr. … McMahan’s opinion that the medicines he has on board his paramedic unit “would have started her up.”

Smith v. Department of Motor Vehicles

1 Cal. App. 3d 499 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1969

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. … (See Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal.2d 790, 794-795 [136 P.2d *505 304]; Ishimatsu v.

Prof. Engineers in Cal. Government v. Brown CA1/3

California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 2015

Government v. … BROWN, as the Governor etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Gray v. O'Banion

23 Cal. App. 468 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1913

were returned to said board of supervisors by the respective boards of election of the six precincts in said district. … “In the case of Chenery v. Aaltham, 8 Cush.

In Re Dikes

18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 9 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 2004

(See Aguilar v. … (See People v.

SUTCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Modesto High School Dist.

208 Cal. App. 3d 1220 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1989

(Brougher v. Board of Public Works (1928) 205 Cal. 426, 435 [ 271 P. 487 ]; Russian Hill Improvement Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1967) 66 Cal.2d 34, 39-40 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 672 , 423 P.2d 824 ].) … Ardaiz, J., and Brown (G.

Browne v. Browne

60 Cal. App. 2d 637 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 1943

, age 3 years, and Dennis Orman Browne, age 2. … In the case of Williams v.

Kirkpatrick v. Damianakes

15 Cal. App. 2d 446 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1936

It is owned by the board of education of the city and county of San Francisco. Said board leased the entire property to the Wise Realty Company which in turn assigned the lease to the Lincoln Realty Company. … (Spore v. Washington, 96 Cal. App. 345 [ 274 Pac. 407 ]; Brown v. Pepperdine, 53 Cal. App. 334 [ 200 Pac. 36 ]; Runyon v. City of Los Angeles, 40 Cal. App. 383 [ 180 Pac. 837 ].)

Arnold v. La Belle Oil Co.

47 Cal. App. 290 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 1920

Rep. 132 , [ 62 Pac. 552 ]; Pacific Bank v. Stone, 121 Cal. 202 , [53 Pac. 634]; Blood v. La Serena etc. Co., 113 Cal. 221 , [ 41 Pac. 1017 , 45 Pac. 252 ]; Salfield v. Sutter etc. … (Brown v. Mason, 155 Cal. 155 , [21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 328, 99 Pac. 867 ]; Boland v. Ashurst Oil etc. Co., 145 Cal. 405 , [ 78 Pac. 871 ]; Levy v. Wolf, 2 Cal. App. 491 , [ 84 Pac. 313 ]; Justy v. Erro, 16 Cal.