Case law

City of San Jose v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 2014

(County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 57, 62; Lorig v. Medical Board (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 462, 467; see also Aguilar v. … App. 2011) 812 N.W.2d 27, 33 [294 Mich.App. 401, 411] [board member's personal notes during meeting not a public record where they were never read into the minutes or used by the township board].)

People v. Rissman

154 Cal. App. 2d 265 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 1957

(People v. MacEwing, 45 Cal.2d 218, 224-225 [ 288 P.2d 257 ]; People v. … Also see People v. Powell, 50 Cal. App. 436, 443 [ 195 P. 456 ]; People v. Brown, 61 Cal.App. 748, 751 [ 216 P. 58 ] ; People v. Layman, 117 Cal.App. 476, 478 [ 4 P.2d 244 ]; People v.

People v. Delgado

45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 501 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 2006

Once the prescribed minimum sentence elapsed, a parole board could order the prisoner released on parole. (Ibid.) … Brown , unlike the instant case, did not involve an ex post facto claim.

Kuntz v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital

California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 2021

v. … Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 489, 497 (Brown).) “ ‘ “Substantial evidence” is evidence of ponderable legal significance, evidence that is reasonable, credible and of solid value.’ ” (Markow v.

Thirteen Committee v. Weinreb

168 Cal. App. 3d 528 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1985

. (§ 81002; Brown v. Superior Court (1971) 5 Cal.3d 509, 524 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 584 , 487 P.2d 1224 ]; Socialist Workers etc. Committee v. Brown (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 879, 888 [ 125 Cal.Rptr. 915 ].) … Committee v. Brown, supra, 53 Cal.App.3d 879, 888-889 ; cf. Buckley v.

People v. Hale

232 Cal. App. 2d 112 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 1965

Tarshes or to the board of supervisors to the extent of their requests for help. … Brown (R. M.), J., concurred.

Styrene Information & Research Center v. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

210 Cal. App. 4th 1082 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 2012

In AFL-CIO v. … (Bruns v.

Estate of Schnell

67 Cal. App. 2d 268 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1944

Brown, as Public Administrator of the County of Los Angeles and the duly appointed administrator of the estate of Anna Schnell, deceased, filed his petition in the estate of August Schnell, predeceased husband of said Anna

Slick Airways, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles

140 Cal. App. 2d 311 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1956

In Ott v. … Co. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362, 365 [ 60 S.Ct. 968 , 84 L.Ed. 1254, 1255 ].

Morgan v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Nov 1, 2022

CTA/NEA v. … (See People v.

People v. Malbry

California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 2024

Brown re Sen. Bill No. 384 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.), Sept. 22, 2017, p. 1.) … (E.g., Lexin v.

Ferreira v. Quik Stop Markets, Inc.

141 Cal. App. 3d 1023 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1983

In People v. … More recently, in Krouse v.

California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges & Hearing Officers in State Employment v. Schwarzenegger

174 Cal. App. 4th 424 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 2009

Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ] (Pacific Legal Foundation) perceived a conflict between the mandate imposed upon the State Personnel Board (SPB) to enforce a civil service system “based on … Brown, Jr., filed an amicus curiae brief in the trial court.

Simi Corporation v. Garamendi

1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 207 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 2003

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board has had procedures allowing it to dismiss a claim adjudication case for lack of prosecution for several decades. (Moran v. … While the board had inherent power to dismiss a claim for various reasons, including abandonment (Moran v.

Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. Eisenberg

California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2026

(a); see also Whitney v. Montegut (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 906, 913 [petition filed by executive director of Medical Board of California, was, pursuant to § 446, “deemed verified”]; Murrieta Valley Unified School Dist. v. … (Board of Supervisors v. McMahon (1990) 219 Cal.App.3d 286, 295, fn. omitted (McMahon).)

CAL.-WESTERN STATES LIFE INS. CO. v. St. Bd. of Equal.

151 Cal. App. 2d 559 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1957

151 Cal.App.2d 559 (1957) 312 P.2d 19 CALIFORNIA-WESTERN STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION et al., Appellants. Docket No. 9048. … Brown, Attorney General, and Harold B. Haas, Deputy Attorney General, for Appellants. Downey, Brand, Seymour and Rohwer for Respondent. VAN DYKE, P.J.

Harris v. Spinali Auto Sales, Inc.

202 Cal. App. 2d 215 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1962

(Sass v. Hank, 108 Cal.App.2d 207, 215 [ 238 P.2d 652 ]; Vierra v. Shaffer, 113 Cal.App.2d *220 768, 772 [ 248 P.2d 992 ]; Mitchel v. Brown, 43 Cal.App.2d 217, 221 [ 110 P.2d 456 ].) … Underwriters at Lloyds London, 185 Cal.App.2d 545, 548 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 276 ]; Estate of Freeman, 146 Cal.App.2d 49, 58 [ 303 P.2d 609 ] ; Mitchel v. Brown, supra, 43 Cal.App.2d 217, 222 .)

Union of American Physicians & Dentists v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission

32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 547 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 2005

The Oklahoma case, City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations Board (Okla., July 5, 2005, No. 101,729) 2005 OK 55 [2005 Okla. … (See, e.g., Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles et. al. v. Philip E.

Resolute Insurance v. Municipal Court

11 Cal. App. 3d 1006 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1970

*1008 Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. The appeals by real party in interest, the People, and the Municipal Court of the Southern Judicial District of San Mateo County are from judgments on review by the superior court. … (See Board of Administration v. Ames, 215 Cal.App.2d 215, 222 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 917 ], hg. den.) The judgments are reversed.

Bautista v. State Personnel Board CA5

California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 2013

State Personnel Board (1951) 37 Cal.2d 634.) The SPB is a state administrative agency with adjudicatory powers under the state Constitution. (Cal. Const., art. VII, §§ 2, 3; Department of Parks & Recreation v. … Under this standard, the California Supreme Court has observed that it is ―very difficult for a complaining employee to have the board’s adverse factual findings overturned.‖ (State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v.