Case law

California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges & Hearing Officers in State Employment v. Schwarzenegger

174 Cal. App. 4th 424 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 2009

Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ] (Pacific Legal Foundation) perceived a conflict between the mandate imposed upon the State Personnel Board (SPB) to enforce a civil service system “based on … Brown, Jr., filed an amicus curiae brief in the trial court.

Estate of Vanderhoofven

18 Cal. App. 3d 940 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1971

The Supreme Court held the action of the board "was discrimination by the State. Such discrimination is forbidden by the Fourteenth Amendment." (Italics ours.) Brown v. … holding in Brown v.

People v. Brown CA2/8

California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 2016

Filed 7/25/16 P. v. … The court awarded Brown the previous credit he received on July 16, 2014 and also awarded conduct credits of 590 days. Brown filed a timely notice of appeal. 3 Miranda v.

Tafoya v. Hastings College of Law

191 Cal. App. 3d 437 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1987

(See Southern Cal Gas Co. v. … In People v.

Hill v. Matthews Paint Co.

149 Cal. App. 2d 714 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1957

(Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co., 129 Cal.App.2d 810, 821 [ 278 P.2d 91 ]; Holmes v. … (Petersen v. Lewis, 2 Cal.2d 569, 572 [ 42 P.2d 311 ]; MeKellar v.

In Re Morales

115 Cal. App. 3d 456 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1981

OPINION BROWN (Gerald), P.J. … (See People v. Gray (1977) 72 Cal. App.3d 18 [ 139 Cal. Rptr. 805 ]; In re Werden (1977) 76 Cal. App.3d 79 [ 142 Cal. Rptr. 622 ].) Both People v.

In Re McGraw

171 Cal. App. 4th 251 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 2009

Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Jessica N. Blonien and Krista L. … . 1205.) (4) The regulations articulate circumstances tending to show unsuitability for parole: "(1) a commitment offense carried out in an `especially heinous, atrocious or cruel manner'; (2) a `[p]revious [r]ecord of [v]

People ex rel. Keller v. La Vista Cemetery Ass'n

175 Cal. App. 2d 197 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1959

Co. v. … Brix Inc. v. Brown, 145 Cal.App.2d 177, 179 [4] [ 302 P.2d 74 ]; City of Sacramento v. Jensen, 146 Cal.App.2d 114, 118 [1] [ 303 P.2d 549 ]; Crimmins v. Gould, 149 Cal.App.2d 383, 389 [4] [ 308 P.2d 786 ].)

McClain v. Sav-On Drugs

9 Cal. App. 5th 684 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2017

v. … Two types of “takings” are assured just compensation: (1) categorical or per se takings, which arise when the government physically occupies property or deprives its owner of all viable uses of the property (Brown v.

People v. Brown CA1/1

California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 2016

Filed 7/29/16 P. v. … Brown has had employment he has people to attest to his value as an employee.

In Re Fain

65 Cal. App. 3d 376 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1976

(Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1943) 23 Cal.2d 303, 323 [ 144 P.2d 4 ]; McDonald’s Systems of California, Inc. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1975) 44 Cal.App.3d 525, 544 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 26 ].) … Brown, and Hearing Representative W.

In re Coronado

87 Cal. App. 3d 788 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1978

(People v. Superior Court (Gonzales), supra, 78 Cal.App.3d 134 ; People v. Alcala (1977) 74 Cal.App.3d 425 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 442 ].) … This is the construction of the statute that was applied by the court in Way v.

Yu v. University of La Verne

196 Cal. App. 4th 779 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 2011

[Citation.]’ ” (Doe v. Brown (2009) 111 Cal.App.4th 408 , 417-418 [ 99 Cal.Rptr.3d 209 ].) b. … (Lloyd Corp. v.

Sierra Club v. Co. of San Diego

California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 2014

Dickenson; Chatten-Brown & Carstens, Douglas P. Carstens and Josh Chatten-Brown for Plaintiff and Respondent. … "'[T]he board of supervisors must make findings . . . to permit a reviewing court to bridge the analytic gap between the evidence and the ultimate decision.'" (People v.

People v. Brinston

California Court of Appeal · May 28, 2026

We assume the Legislature was aware of the different approaches in In re Martinez and Martinez v. Board of Parole Hearings. (Brown v. … BROWN, P. J. WE CONCUR: STREETER, J. GOLDMAN, J. People v.

Jay Bailey Construction Co. v. Beery Hotel Corp.

221 Cal. App. 2d 135 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 1963

But in Barr Lumber Co. v. … (Harmon Lumber Co. v. Brown, 165 Cal. 193 [ 131 P. 368 ]; and see cases collected 123 A.L.R. 50 et seq.)

Kern County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. Bellino

24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 384 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 2005

Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1943) 23 Cal.2d 215 [ 143 P.2d 481 ]; cf. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers’ Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 41 Cal.App.4th 1363, 1376 [ 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 157 ].) … Brown Act]; Board of Retirement v. Santa Barbara County Grand Jury (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1185, 1195 [ 68 Cal.Rptr.2d 607 ] [board is “local government agency” subject to powers of grand jury].)

Wienholz v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

217 Cal. App. 3d 1501 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1989

Brown Jr.- Bill Lockyer Civil Liability Reform Act of 1987 but not in others. … (See, e.g., Bradley v. Richmond School Board (1974) 416 U.S. 696 [ 40 L.Ed.2d 476 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 ]; Rumford v.

Daley v. County of Butte

227 Cal. App. 2d 380 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 1964

We shall refer to that action as Brown v. Daley. The plaintiffs in Brown v. Daley were represented by attorney J. R. King, Jr., of Oroville. The insurance carrier for Daley undertook defense of the action. … The order provided that the trial of Brown v. Daley be stayed until Daley v. Butte County was at issue.

Keulen v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

66 Cal. App. 4th 1089 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 23, 1998

“Upon the filing of a petition for reconsideration the board may direct the taking of additional evidence [section 5906] . . . .” (Id., at p. 318; King v. Workers’ Comp. … If the Board had doubts about this evidence, it could have directed additional medical evidence. (King v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 231 Cal.App.3d at p. 1649 , citing Raymond Plastering v. Workmen’s Comp. App.