Case law

In Re Thomson

104 Cal. App. 3d 950 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1980

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. Petitioner Thomson, currently released on parole, seeks a writ of habeas corpus to prevent the Board of Prison Terms (BPT) from extending his maximum parole term from one to three years. … Code, § 3; People v. Daniels (1963) 222 Cal.App.2d 99, 101 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 844 ].) Further, the statute if retroactively applied, would be ex post facto.

Rambo v. Mattox

225 Cal. App. 2d 185 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1964

BROWN (Gerald), J. Irene Mattox, Auditor-Controller of Imperial County (hereinafter called appellant) appeals from an order of the superior court issuing a writ of mandate to compel her to deliver a warrant to C. J. … The board of supervisors appropriated the funds with which the claim could be paid.

People v. Crockett

California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 2015

(People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 319 (Brown).) … (Brown, at pp. 317-318, 325.)

Stanchfield v. Hamer Toyota, Inc.

37 Cal. App. 4th 1495 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 1995

The board of directors apparently adopted a resolution incorporating those directives at its meeting of July 9, 1990. A month later, the board summarily discharged appellant. … Equally distinguishable are two additional cases relied upon by appellant, Zellerino v. Brown (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1097 [ 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 222 ] and Waicis v. Superior Court (1990) 226 Cal.App.3d 283 [ 276 Cal.Rptr. 45 ].

People v. Kuhn

216 Cal. App. 2d 695 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1963

(Stockton School Dist. v. Wright, 134 Cal. 64, 68 [ 66 P. 34 ]; Meyer v. Board of Trustees, 195 Cal.App.2d 420, 430 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 717 ].) … J., and Brown (G.), J., concurred.

Kern v. County of Imperial

226 Cal. App. 3d 391 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1990

v. … (See DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 174 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ].)

Kuntz v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital

California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 2021

v. … Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 489, 497 (Brown).) “ ‘ “Substantial evidence” is evidence of ponderable legal significance, evidence that is reasonable, credible and of solid value.’ ” (Markow v.

Gayle v. Hamm

25 Cal. App. 3d 250 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1972

(Mulkery v. Reitman (1966) 64 Cal.2d 529, 535 [50 CaL.Rptr. 881, 413 P.2d 825 ], affd. 387 U.S. 369 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 830 , 87 S.Ct. 1627 ]; Brown v. Jordan (1938) 12 Cal.2d 75, 84 [ 82 P.2d 450 ].) … If the petition together with supplementary petitions, if any, is found to be sufficient, the county clerk shall submit it to the board of supervisors at the next regular meeting of the board.”

McClain v. Sav-On Drugs

9 Cal. App. 5th 684 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2017

v. … Two types of “takings” are assured just compensation: (1) categorical or per se takings, which arise when the government physically occupies property or deprives its owner of all viable uses of the property (Brown v.

Kreutzer v. County of San Diego

153 Cal. App. 3d 62 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1984

State Board of Education (1973) 30 Cal.App.3d 187, 192 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 201 ]; Slaughter v. Edwards, supra, 11 Cal.App.3d 285, 294 ). … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Staniforth, J., concurred.

Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. Eisenberg

California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2026

(a); see also Whitney v. Montegut (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 906, 913 [petition filed by executive director of Medical Board of California, was, pursuant to § 446, “deemed verified”]; Murrieta Valley Unified School Dist. v. … (Board of Supervisors v. McMahon (1990) 219 Cal.App.3d 286, 295, fn. omitted (McMahon).)

Estate of Vanderhoofven

18 Cal. App. 3d 940 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1971

The Supreme Court held the action of the board "was discrimination by the State. Such discrimination is forbidden by the Fourteenth Amendment." (Italics ours.) Brown v. … holding in Brown v.

California Accounts, Inc. v. Superior Court

50 Cal. App. 3d 483 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 1975

The section extends the time in which a person may appeal an order of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board where notice of the action of the board is given by mail. … v.

In Re Morales

115 Cal. App. 3d 456 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1981

OPINION BROWN (Gerald), P.J. … (See People v. Gray (1977) 72 Cal. App.3d 18 [ 139 Cal. Rptr. 805 ]; In re Werden (1977) 76 Cal. App.3d 79 [ 142 Cal. Rptr. 622 ].) Both People v.

Hill v. Matthews Paint Co.

149 Cal. App. 2d 714 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1957

(Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co., 129 Cal.App.2d 810, 821 [ 278 P.2d 91 ]; Holmes v. … (Petersen v. Lewis, 2 Cal.2d 569, 572 [ 42 P.2d 311 ]; MeKellar v.

People v. Brown CA2/8

California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 2016

Filed 8/5/16 P. v. … He cites Brown v. Wainwright (5th Cir. 1982) 665 F.2d 607, 611. This is exactly what occurred here. Brown likens his case to People v.

Slick Airways, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles

140 Cal. App. 2d 311 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1956

In Ott v. … Co. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362, 365 [ 60 S.Ct. 968 , 84 L.Ed. 1254, 1255 ].

Metropolitan Water District v. Heilbron

167 Cal. App. 2d 190 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 19, 1959

Vermilion County, 271 Ill. 126 [ 110 N.E. 890 ]; Stone v. City of Chicago, 207 Ill. 492 [ 69 N.E. 970 ]; Brown v. Guthrie, 185 Ind. 669 [ 114 N.E. 443 ]; Pennington v. … City of Oconto, 110 Wis. 660 [ 86 N.W. 681 ]; 100 A.L.R. 610 ; 15 McQuillin Municipal Corporations 3d ed. 359; contra: Coulson v. Portland, 6 F. Cas. 629 No. 3275; Bateman v. Board of Commrs. of Clarendon Imp. Hist.

London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Las Lomitas School District

191 Cal. App. 2d 423 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1961

(Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Blade, 139 Cal.App.2d 580, 592 [ 294 P.2d 140 ]; Zeller v. Browne, 143 Cal.App.2d 191, 193 [ 299 P.2d 315 ].) ” (Pry Corp. of America v. Leach, supra, 177 Cal.App.2d 632, 636 .) … The board of the district did not so state.

Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. Deukmejian

227 Cal. App. 3d 663 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1991

(Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners (1969) 1 Cal.3d 351, 359 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 337 , 461 P.2d 617 ].) … (Brown v. State Personnel Bd. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1151, 1159 [ 213 Cal.Rptr. 53 ].)