Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

2.12s

  • Johnson v. State Personnel Board CA3

    California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 2014

    Filed 4/15/14 Johnson v. … Decisions of the Board are reviewed “only to determine whether substantial evidence supports the determination, even when vested rights are involved. [Citations.]” (Coleman v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • People v. Kelley

    70 Cal. App. 3d 418 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 3, 1977

    (See Bautista v. Jones (1944) 25 Cal.2d 746, 749 [ 115 P.2d 343 ]; Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners (1963) 219 Cal.App.2d 504, 509 [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 349 ].) … Brown (G. A.), P.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of Rolling Hills Estates

    225 Cal. App. 2d 525 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 1964

    Browne, 135 Cal. 649 [ 67 P. 1082 ], fixing salaries of court reporters in counties of the thirtieth class (Ventura); Consolidated Printing & Publishing Co. v. … As pointed out in People v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Horace

    157 Cal. App. 2d 395 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 4, 1958

    About four days prior an earthquake had broken many windows in the building but these had been boarded both on the inside and outside with carriage bolts holding the boards together. … This is not a case of mere “suspicion” of guilt as was the situation in People v. Wilkins, 141 Cal.App.2d 557 [ 297 P.2d 42 ], and People v. Draper, 69 Cal.App.2d 781 [ 160 P.2d 80 ], cited by defendant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fitch v. Select Products Co.

    134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 120 · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2003

    Rptr. 474 ; Brown v. Stewart (1982) 129 Cal. App.3d 331, 342 , 181 Cal.Rptr. 112 ; Kizer v. Ortiz (1990) 219 Cal.App.3d 1055 , 268 Cal. Rptr. 666 ; State of California v. … Columbia Southwestern Medical Center (Okl.Civ.App.1998) 964 P.2d 987 ; Department of Public Welfare v. Tyree (Ind.1989) 540 N.E.2d 18 . [12] Brown v.

    Disagreed with by Bustamonte v. Flores, 134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 683 (2003)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lawson v. Lowengart

    251 Cal. App. 2d 98 · California Court of Appeal · May 17, 1967

    The trustees were also given sole and absolute discretion to purchase from the assets of the Helen Brown trust a contract for care, room, board and services at a rest home or other institution where retired elderly people … Maxwell did not constitute delivery nor create a presumption thereof (Boyd v. Slayback, 63 Cal. 493 ; Miller v. Jansen, supra). As to Dr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Gil

    248 Cal. App. 2d 189 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 1967

    A cap, like the cap of a whiskey bottle, was observed on the front seat and an empty beer can was found on the floor board behind the driver’s seat. … Brown, 45 Cal.2d 640, 643 [ 290 P.2d 528 ].) On the other hand it is not necessarily constitutionally vulnerable because it turned up evidence of a crime different from the one which occasioned the search. (People v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Rushing v. Powell

    61 Cal. App. 3d 597 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 27, 1976

    Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (See Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1 (1944) 24 Cal.2d 796, 810-811 [ 151 P.2d 505 , 157 A.L.R. 324 ]; Struckman v. Board of Trustees (1940) 38 Cal.App.2d 373, 376 [ 101 P.2d 151 ].) See Friends of Mammoth v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • ZF Micro Devices, Inc. v. TAT Capital Partners, Ltd.

    5 Cal. App. 5th 69 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 2016

    investors’ assistance in TAT’s taking control of the board. … (Weil and Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2015) ¶ 6:592, p. 6–167, original italics (Weil and Brown); see also Rylaarsdam and Turner, Cal.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • People v. Ortiz

    185 Cal. App. 2d 622 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1960

    (People v. Stanford, 176 Cal.App.2d 388, 390 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 425 ]; People v. Henderson, 121 Cal.App.2d 816, 818 [ 264 P.2d 225 ]; People v. Noland, 61 Cal.App.2d 364, 366 [ 143 P.2d 86 ].) … Moreover, as stated in People v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. San Diego Unified School District

    217 Cal. App. 3d 692 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1990

    (Jackson v. *698 Board of Education [1967] 250 Cal.App.2d 856, 860 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 763 ].)” (Jamison v. State of California, supra, 31 Cal.App.3d at p. 517 .) … (Driscoll v. City of Los Angeles (1967) 67 Cal.2d 297, 305 [ 61 Cal.Rptr. 661 , 431 P.2d 245 ]; DeYoung v. Del Mar Thoroughbred Club (1984) 159 Cal.App.3d 858, 862 [ 206 Cal.Rptr. 28 ]; Nicholson-Brown, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pacific Caisson & Shoring v. Bernards Bros.

    California Court of Appeal · May 19, 2015

    (Brown v. Superior Court (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 971, 994; People v. Alves (1957) 155 Cal.App.2d Supp. 870, 871-872 [payments to a health or welfare fund under a collective bargaining agreement are wages].) … (Alatriste v. Cesar’s Exterior Designs, Inc. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 656, 665.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. M. K. & T. Oil Co.

    5 Cal. App. 2d 117 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 1935

    In the ease of Scott v. … The separate assent of a majority of the board was all that ought to be required under the circumstances presented by the *124 evidence. ’ ’ The same conclusion was reached in Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Adler v. Los Angeles Unified School District

    98 Cal. App. 3d 280 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1979

    This board rule, however, was not adopted until September 11, 1969 (Ruggiero v. Los Angeles City Unified Sch. … (Brown v. Pitchess (1975) 13 Cal.3d 518, 520-523 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 204 , 531 P.2d 772 ].) 8 A court’s intended decision may be resorted to for the purpose of clarifying its decision (Harm v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re Carroll

    80 Cal. App. 3d 22 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1978

    Brown, supra, 14 Cal.3d 571, 574 ; In re Bye, supra, 12 Cal.3d 96, 110 ; In re Prewitt, supra, 8 Cal.3d 470, 473-474, fn. 5 ; and People v. … Wolff v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of Sacramento v. Public Employees' Retirement System

    22 Cal. App. 4th 786 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1994

    Board of Administration (1992) 4 Cal.4th 462, 468 [ 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 514 , 841 P.2d 1034 ]; People v. … (See, e.g., County of Sutter v. Board of Administration, supra, 215 Cal.App.3d at p. 1295 .)

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • People v. Richardson

    6 Cal. App. 3d 70 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1970

    (See People v. … (See People v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Estate of Schley

    100 Cal. App. 3d 161 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1979

    (In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 845 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 , 94 A.L.R.3d 164 ].) … Bank v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown CA2/7

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 2016

    Filed 9/16/16 P. v. … That was the sentence imposed on Brown. Two years later, in Miller v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • People v. Brown CA2/5

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 2016

    Filed 9/15/16 P. v. … (People v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.