Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

2.65s

  • De Court v. Beckman Instruments, Inc.

    32 Cal. App. 3d 628 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1973

    the Board had jurisdiction to make the award (Unruh v. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Ault, J., concurred.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • White v. Davis

    121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 51 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 2002

    Brown, supra, 30 Cal.App.4th at p. 1283 , 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 404 ; Walsh v. … California Assn. for Safety Education v. Brown, supra, 30 Cal.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Hopper

    20 Cal. App. 2d 108 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1937

    In People v. Browning, 132 Cal. App. 136 [ 22 Pac. (2d) 784 ], a reversal of the judgment was sought on the ground that a portion of the trial was conducted on a holiday. … (People v. Wolcott, 137 Cal. App. 355 [ 30 Pac. (2d) 601 ] ; People v. Robinson, 107 Cal. App. 211 [ 290 Pac. 470 ] ; People v. Tapia, 131 Cal. 647 [ 63 Pac. 1001 ].)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Auburn Woods I Homeowners Ass'n v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission

    18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 669 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 2004

    (Brown v. Smith (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 767, 780 [ 64 Cal.Rptr.2d 301 ].) In other words, the FHA provides a minimum level of protection that FEHA may exceed. … (Taylor v. Phoenixville School District, supra, 184 F.3d at p. 315 .) The same is true here. (See Brown v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Beverly Hills Surgery Center CA2/7

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 2014

    Filed 2/18/14 Brown v. … , Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Nathan v. French American Bilingual School

    2 Cal. App. 3d 279 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1969

    Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. … (Sawday v Vista Irr. Dist., 64 Cal.2d 833, 836 [ 52 Cal. Rptr. 1 , 415 P.2d 816 ]; Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v Los Angeles Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers, 192 Cal.App.2d 268, 277 [ 13 Cal.Rptr. *283 446 ].)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Thein v. State Personnel Board CA3

    California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 2014

    (American Funeral Concepts v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 303, 311 (American Funeral).) … This statute “establishes a one-year statute of limitations on lawsuits seeking review of State Personnel Board decisions.” (Ng v. State Personnel Bd. (1977) 68 Cal.App.3d 600, 606-607; see also Sinclair v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cal Fire Local 2881 v. Public Employment Relations Bd.

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 2018

    (State Personnel Bd. v. Department of Personnel Admin. (2005) 37 Cal.4th 512, 526-527; Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 174.) … (State Personnel Board, supra, PERB Dec. No. 1864-S, pp. 21-23, 26-27 [premising this holding on analogous Supreme Court decision in State Personnel Bd. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Legarra v. Federated Mutual Insurance

    35 Cal. App. 4th 1472 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1995

    Here the Board’s claim related to pollution “at” the site. (East Quincy Services Dist. v. Continental Ins. Co. (E.D.Cal. 1994) 864 F.Supp. 976, 980 ; see also Gregory v. … J., and Brown, J., concurred.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • In re McGhee

    California Court of Appeal · May 16, 2019

    (See, e.g., Coleman v. Brown (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2014, No. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK DAD (PC)) 2014 U.S.Dist. Lexis 17913.) … While Proposition 57 undoubtedly was intended to maintain the inmate population at a level that complies with the federal court order (see Coleman v. Brown, supra, 2014 U.S.Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. County of Butte

    37 Cal. App. 3d 461 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 1974

    (Estate of Bristol (1943) 23 Cal.2d 221, 223 [ 143 P.2d 689 ]; Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Yakov v. … In Board of Supervisors v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Doerr v. Fandango Lumber Co.

    31 Cal. App. 318 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1916

    Brown advises two thousand in cheeks outstanding which we will protest if the money is not wired immediately.” … {Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co., 100 Cal. 67, 69, 70 , [ 34 Pac. 527 ].) 2.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wirz v. Wirz

    96 Cal. App. 2d 171 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 21, 1950

    (Dodrer v. Dodrer (1944), 183 Md. 413 [ 37 A.2d 919 ] and State v. Brown (1937), 213 Ind. 118 [ 11 N.E.2d 679, 682 , 113 A.L.R. 1243 ].) … As pointed out in Tipton v. Tipton and Graeb v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Mount Pleasant Elementary School Dist.

    California Court of Appeal · Aug 29, 2025

    Mesplé, bill memorandum to Governor Brown re Assem. Bill No. 655 (1965 Reg. Sess. Apr. 26, 1965); Stats. 1965, ch. 222, § 1, p. 1193; Chairman Charles B. Garrigus, letter to Governor Edmund G. Brown re Assem. … (Walt Disney Parks & Resorts U.S., Inc. v. Superior Court (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 872, 879, citing Roy v. Superior Court (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1337, 1352; Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • County of Alameda v. Ross

    32 Cal. App. 2d 135 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 1939

    (Hamlin v. Barnhart, 26 Cal. App. 632 [ 147 Pac. 1188 ]; Charles Brown & Sons v. White Lunch Co., 92 Cal. App. 457 [ 268 Pac. 490 ]; Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp., 98 Cal. App. 650 [ 277 Pac. 519 ]; Naify v. … The powers of a board of supervisors with respect to incurring municipal indebtedness should be determined by a strict construction of the law. (Hurst v. City of Burlingame, supra; Egan v.

    Disagreed with by Alameda County v. United States, 124 F.2d 611 (1941)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Dailey v. City of San Diego

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2014

    (See Woodland Park Management, LLC v. City of East Palo Alto Rent Stabilization Board (2010) 181 18 Cal.App.4th 915, 923, fn. 5.) … (Voters for Responsible Retirement v. Board of Supervisors (1994) 8 Cal.4th 765, 781.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goss v. Department of Motor Vehicles

    264 Cal. App. 2d 268 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1968

    BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … (Beamon v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 180 Cal.App.2d 200, 210 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 396 ].) Goss did not call any witnesses. He was subject to being called and cross-examined by the hearing officer. This was done.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Beverly Hills Surgery Center CA2/7

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 2014

    Filed 2/25/14 Brown v. … Filed 2/18/14 Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Wang v. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement

    219 Cal. App. 3d 1152 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1990

    In Brown v. … (Beach Colony II v. California Coastal Com. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 106, 114 [ 212 Cal.Rptr. 485 ]; Austin v. Board of Retirement (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1528, 1535 [ 258 Cal.Rptr. 106 ].)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Satchell v. Industrial Accident Commission

    94 Cal. App. 2d 473 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1949

    Lancaster went outside, got a brown whiskey bottle, went to one of the large cans that cleaning fluid was kept in, filled the bottle, told Messier it was not “the right thing for.it,” put the bottle on a board behind where … (Leffert v. Industrial Acc. Com., 219 Cal. 710 [ 28 P.2d 911 ] ; Pacific Indem. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 26 Cal.2d 509, 513 [ 159 P.2d 625 ] ; Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial Acc.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.