Case law

City of Burlingame v. County of San Mateo

103 Cal. App. 2d 885 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1951

An alternative writ issued, halting board action until further order. … (Braun v. Brown, 13 Cal.2d 130, 133 [ 87 P.2d 1009 ].) Accordingly the appeal from the judgment dismissing the main case is dismissed. The appeal from the order denying permission to intervene is affirmed. Nourse, P.

South v. Wishard

123 Cal. App. 2d 642 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 3, 1954

In Taff v. … The burden was upon plaintiff to excuse this failure to proceed diligently against defendant Brown within the statutory period following discovery. (Lady Washington Consol. Co. *652 v.

Kaiser Foundation Hosp. v. Workers' Comp. App. Bd.

82 Cal. App. 3d 39 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 1978

Code, § 5904; Cedillo v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1971) 5 Cal.3d 450 , 455-456 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 471 , 487 P.2d 1039 ]; U.S. Auto Stores v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. … Young v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1944) 63 Cal.App.2d 286 [ 146 P.2d 693 ]; Royster v. Workmen's Comp.

Creighton v. City of Santa Monica

160 Cal. App. 3d 1011 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 12, 1984

Rptr. 607 ]; Brown v. City of Berkeley (1970) 57 Cal. App.3d 223, 231 [ 129 Cal. Rptr. 1 ].) … Courts are bound to uphold municipal ordinances and bylaws unless they manifestly transcend the powers of the enacting body."'" ( Brown v. City of Berkeley (1976) 57 Cal. App.3d 223, 231 [ 129 Cal.

Governing Board of El Dorado Union High School District v. Commission on Professional Competence

171 Cal. App. 3d 324 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1985

(Bleeck v. State Board of Optometry (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 415, 432 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 860 ]; Edgren v. Regents of University of California (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 515, 520 [ 205 Cal.Rptr. 6 ].) … (Governing Board v. Commission on Professional Competence (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 447, 461 [ 140 Cal.Rptr. 206 ].)

Sonoma Luxury Resort v. Cal. Regional Water Quality Control Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 2023

(Scott v. … The Regional Board and the State Board are entitled to recover their respective costs on appeal. GOLDMAN, J. WE CONCUR: BROWN, P. J.

Alpha Stores, Ltd. v. Croft

60 Cal. App. 2d 349 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 1943

He said, ‘You can have Brown’s Hill, go ahead and do what you want with it.’ Q. Is that the expression he used, ‘Brown’s Hill’? A. Yes. ... … (Burlingame v. Rowland, 77 Cal. 315 [ 19 P. 526 , 1 L.R.A, 829]; Bakersfield Town Hall Association v. Chester, 55 Cal. 98 ; Kinsell v. Thomas, 18 Cal.App. 683 [ 124 P. 220 ]; Peixouto v.

Santa Clara County Environmental Health Ass'n v. County of Santa Clara

173 Cal. App. 3d 74 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1985

(Nestle v. … The Board of Supervisors further finds that it has fully complied with the requirements of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. [1] Section 2: [1] Notwithstanding the provisions of the Ordinance NS-5.83, all salaries for all classifications

Montoya v. State Personnel Board CA5

California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 2021

Filed 11/5/21 Montoya v. … BCV-18-101662) v.

Johar v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 2022

v. … (Robles v. Employment Development Dept. (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 1029, 1036; Robles v. Employment Development Dept. (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 530, 547, 549; Brown, supra, 20 Cal.App.5th at pp. 1114–1115.)

Stevens v. WCAB

California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 2015

Hersh, Counsel 2 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP, Theodore A. … Hersh, Counsel 28 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP, Theodore A.

Goodstein v. Superior Court

42 Cal. App. 4th 1635 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 29, 1996

(Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Gillespie (1990) 50 Cal.3d 82, 100 [ 266 Cal.Rptr. 117 , 785 P.2d 500 ]; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … In Brown v.

Brown v. City of Oakland CA1/2

California Court of Appeal · Aug 27, 2020

Filed 8/27/20 Brown v. … Brown v. City of Oakland (A157706) 32

Mason v. Marriage & Family Center

228 Cal. App. 3d 537 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1991

(Larcher v. Wanless (1976) 18 Cal.3d 646, 656, fn. 11 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 75 , 557 P.2d 507 ]; see also Steketee v. Lintz, Williams & Rothberg (1985) 38 Cal.3d *543 46, 54 [ 210 Cal.Rptr. 781 , 694 P.2d 1153 ]; Brown v. … Relying on D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 22 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ], and Leasman v.

Peterson v. Montgomery Holding Co.

89 Cal. App. 2d 890 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 3, 1949

In the case of Brown v. Pforr, 38 Cal. 550 , the principal offered to pay a commission to the brokers if they would find within one month from the date of the agreement a purchaser for a certain parcel of real estate. … The rule stated in the foregoing cases is reaffirmed in Brown v. De Carlo, 97 Cal.App. 426 [ 275 P. 992 ], and M. V. B. MacAdam Co., Inc. v. Bryant, 86 Cal.App. 74, 79 [ 260 P. 298 ].

People v. Brim

257 Cal. App. 2d 839 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1968

BROWN (Gerald), P. J. … Board of Education, 59 Cal.2d 203, 218 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 379 P.2d 4 ]; People v. Victor, 62 Cal.2d 280, 300 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 199 , 398 P.2d 391 ].)

California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Goodin

76 Cal. App. 785 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 8, 1926

To support that position, appellant cites these cases: Hickman v. Johnson, 36 Cal. App. 342 [ 178 Pac. 145 ]; McColgan v. Muirland, 2 Cal. App. 6 [ 82 Pac. 1113 ]; Field v. … Edson, the last named a member of the board of supervisors of Yolo County, and that he knew they were men of extensive business interests and that he had confidence in their business judgment.

Mundell v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control

211 Cal. App. 2d 231 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 21, 1962

(Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 238, 246 [ 340 P.2d 1 ] ; Marini v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 177 Cal.App.2d 785, 786 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 714 ].) … (See Swegle v. State Board of Equalization, 125 Cal.App.2d 432, 438 [ 270 P.2d 518 ]; Givens v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 176 Cal.App.2d 529, 533-534 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 446 ].)

Finegan v. County of Los Angeles

109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 762 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 2001

(Bragdon v. … In Camp v.

Bell v. City of Torrance

226 Cal. App. 3d 189 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1990

(Wiles v. State Personnel Board (1942) 19 Cal.2d 344, 347 [ 121 P.2d 673 ].) … State Personnel Board (1938) 25 Cal.App.2d 699, 705 [ 78 P.2d 467 ]; Kelly v. State Personnel Board (1939) 31 Cal.App.2d 443, 449 [ 88 P.2d 264 ]; Brown v.