Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

2.19s

  • People v. Blunt

    186 Cal. App. 3d 1594 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1986

    These provisions were applied to facts very similar to the present case in People v. Brown (1980) 107 Cal.App.3d 858 [ 166 Cal.Rptr. 144 ] (Fourth Dist., Div. Two). … Under Brown as approved by Atiles , the absence of a San Bernardino restraint is fatal to defendant’s claim to credit for the Los Angeles custody. People v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Montoya v. State Personnel Board CA5

    California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 2021

    Filed 12/6/21 Montoya v. … Filed 11/5/21 Montoya v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In Re Marriage of Biddle

    52 Cal. App. 4th 396 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1997

    Biddle v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees (U.S. Dist. Ct. (N.D.Cal.), 1991, No. 91-CV-20618).) Three years later, the Biddles’ marriage of 21 years was dissolved. … (In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d 838, 846-847 .) The specifics of the division are for the trial court’s discretion. (See Fam.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Butchers Union, Local 532 v. Farmers Mkts.

    67 Cal. App. 3d 905 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1977

    (Brown v. Western R. of Alabama, 338 U.S. 294, 296 [ 94 L.Ed. 100, 102 , 70 S.Ct. 105 ]; and see Riess v. … The board refused to do so and the office of appeals of the National Labor Relations Board denied the Union’s appeal from the board’s decision.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Hofman Ranch v. Yuba County Local Agency Formation Commission

    172 Cal. App. 4th 805 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 2009

    Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. Code, 1 § 54950.5 et seq.) requires “[a]ll meetings of the legislative body of a local agency [to] be open and public ... except as otherwise provided in this chapter.” (§ 54953, subd. (a).) … (Lucas v. Board of Trustees (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 988, 991-992 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 431 ].)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Burnett v. Reyes

    118 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 878 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1953

    (U Drive & Tour, Ltd. v. … And in Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal.2d 534 at 539 [ 110 P.2d 992 ], the Supreme Court said.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Litchfield v. County of Marin

    130 Cal. App. 2d 806 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1955

    (City of Compton v. Boland, 26 Cal.2d 310 [ 158 P.2d 397 ]; Barrett v. Brown, 26 Cal.2d 328 [ 158 P.2d 567 ]; Peterson v. Johnson, 39 Cal.2d 745 [ 249 P.2d 17 ].) … (See Barrett v. Brown, supra, 26 Cal.2d 328, 330-331 .)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bookout v. Local Agency Formation Commission

    49 Cal. App. 3d 383 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1975

    Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 166 Cal.App.2d at pp. 527-528; see also Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co. (1950) 339 U.S. 306, 314 [ 94 L.Ed. 865 , 873, 70 S.Ct.652,657]; Johnson v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Fadel v. Slayman

    84 Cal. App. 2d 6 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1948

    “It is the universal presumption of law,” says the court in Fites v. … The above statement of the rule has been quoted with approval in later cases, such as Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 200 Cal. 318, 324 [ 253 P. 726 ], and Vagim v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Ass'n.

    California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 2018

    Education v. City of San Diego (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 1024 (California Alliance), a citizen group alleged “four continuing violations” of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act; Gov. … (Monterossa, supra, 237 Cal.App.4th at p. 756.; see e.g., DisputeSuite, LLC v. Scoreinc.com (2017) 2 Cal.5th 968, 977; Bell v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 805, 833; Moore v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brydon v. City of Hermosa Beach

    93 Cal. App. 615 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 23, 1928

    (Strasser v. Moonelis, 108 N. Y. 611 [ 15 N. E. 730 ]; Pfohl v. Simpson, 59 N. Y. 174 ; Brown v. Cheese Assn., 59 N. Y. 242 ; Schneider v. City of Rochester, 155 N. Y. 619 [ 50 N. E. 291 ]; Buffington v. Harvey, 95 U. … (See Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274, 282 [ 57 Pac. 82 ].)

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • D'ANDREA v. Pringle

    243 Cal. App. 2d 689 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1966

    The applicable rule is stated in Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. … (See Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. Hatton, supra, p. 859 ; City of Dunsmuir v. Silva, 154 Cal.App.2d 825, 828 [ 317 P.2d 653 ]; Morgan v. Veach, 59 Cal.App.2d 682, 688-689 [ 139 P.2d 976 ] Felsenthal v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Vaughan v. County of Tulare

    56 Cal. App. 261 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1922

    In Hatton v. Gregg, 4 Cal. App. 537 [ 88 Pac. 592 ], it is said: “Both upon reason and the authority of People v. … Code; 1 Corpus Juris, p. 704; City of Syracuse v. Roscoe, 66 Misc. Rep. 317 [ 123 N. Y. Supp. 403 ]; State v. Brown, 10 Or. 215 .)

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of S.F.

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 5, 2014

    (Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 862.) … Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1915) 239 U.S. 441, 446 (Bi-Metallic) [distinguishing Londoner v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • English v. City of Long Beach

    114 Cal. App. 2d 311 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1952

    (Fox v. Workman, 6 Cal.App. 633 at 635 [ 92 P. 742 ]; McClatchy v. Matthews, 135 Cal. 274, 276 [ 67 P. 134 ]; Charles L. Donohoe Co. v. Superior Court, 79 Cal.App. 41, 44 [ 248 P. 1007 ]; Brown v. … State Personnel Board, 22 Cal.2d 198 [ 137 P.2d 433 ]; Abelleira v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • San Bernardino Public Employees Ass'n v. City of Fontana

    79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 634 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 1998

    (Board of Administration v. Wilson (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1130 [ 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 207 ].) … on the board and a factor in their decision to retire].)

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Vermeulen v. Superior Court

    204 Cal. App. 3d 1192 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1988

    (Finn v. G.D. Searle & Co., supra, 35 Cal.3d at p. 699 .) In Brown v. … In so ruling, Brown cited numerous cases which do not involve prescription drugs. (Dimond v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. (1976) 65 Cal.App.3d 173 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 895 ]; Bojorquez v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • G.I. Industries v. City of Thousand Oaks

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 2022

    Statutory Background (a) Brown Act The Brown Act begins with a declaration of purpose: “In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares that the public commissions, boards … They do not discuss whether the Brown Act applies. A case is not authority for issues it does not consider. (Contra Costa Water Dist. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide CA2/7

    California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 2021

    Filed 11/17/21 Brown v. … (Van v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Taylor v. City of Los Angeles

    60 Cal. App. 4th 611 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1997

    (Edison Co. v. Labor Board (1938) 305 U.S. 197, 225 [ 59 S.Ct. 206, 215 , 83 L.Ed. 126 ].) … Brown v. State Personnel Bd. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1151 [ 213 Cal.Rptr. 53 ] and Brooks v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.