Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.19s
186 Cal. App. 3d 1594 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1986
These provisions were applied to facts very similar to the present case in People v. Brown (1980) 107 Cal.App.3d 858 [ 166 Cal.Rptr. 144 ] (Fourth Dist., Div. Two). … Under Brown as approved by Atiles , the absence of a San Bernardino restraint is fatal to defendant’s claim to credit for the Los Angeles custody. People v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMontoya v. State Personnel Board CA5
California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 2021
Filed 12/6/21 Montoya v. … Filed 11/5/21 Montoya v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished52 Cal. App. 4th 396 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1997
Biddle v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees (U.S. Dist. Ct. (N.D.Cal.), 1991, No. 91-CV-20618).) Three years later, the Biddles’ marriage of 21 years was dissolved. … (In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d 838, 846-847 .) The specifics of the division are for the trial court’s discretion. (See Fam.
Cited 15 timesPublishedButchers Union, Local 532 v. Farmers Mkts.
67 Cal. App. 3d 905 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1977
(Brown v. Western R. of Alabama, 338 U.S. 294, 296 [ 94 L.Ed. 100, 102 , 70 S.Ct. 105 ]; and see Riess v. … The board refused to do so and the office of appeals of the National Labor Relations Board denied the Union’s appeal from the board’s decision.
Cited 17 timesPublishedHofman Ranch v. Yuba County Local Agency Formation Commission
172 Cal. App. 4th 805 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 2009
Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. Code, 1 § 54950.5 et seq.) requires “[a]ll meetings of the legislative body of a local agency [to] be open and public ... except as otherwise provided in this chapter.” (§ 54953, subd. (a).) … (Lucas v. Board of Trustees (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 988, 991-992 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 431 ].)
Cited 2 timesPublished118 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 878 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1953
(U Drive & Tour, Ltd. v. … And in Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal.2d 534 at 539 [ 110 P.2d 992 ], the Supreme Court said.
Cited 1 timesPublished130 Cal. App. 2d 806 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1955
(City of Compton v. Boland, 26 Cal.2d 310 [ 158 P.2d 397 ]; Barrett v. Brown, 26 Cal.2d 328 [ 158 P.2d 567 ]; Peterson v. Johnson, 39 Cal.2d 745 [ 249 P.2d 17 ].) … (See Barrett v. Brown, supra, 26 Cal.2d 328, 330-331 .)
Cited 10 timesPublishedBookout v. Local Agency Formation Commission
49 Cal. App. 3d 383 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1975
Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 166 Cal.App.2d at pp. 527-528; see also Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co. (1950) 339 U.S. 306, 314 [ 94 L.Ed. 865 , 873, 70 S.Ct.652,657]; Johnson v.
Cited 13 timesPublished84 Cal. App. 2d 6 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1948
“It is the universal presumption of law,” says the court in Fites v. … The above statement of the rule has been quoted with approval in later cases, such as Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 200 Cal. 318, 324 [ 253 P. 726 ], and Vagim v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedArtus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Ass'n.
California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 2018
Education v. City of San Diego (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 1024 (California Alliance), a citizen group alleged “four continuing violations” of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act; Gov. … (Monterossa, supra, 237 Cal.App.4th at p. 756.; see e.g., DisputeSuite, LLC v. Scoreinc.com (2017) 2 Cal.5th 968, 977; Bell v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 805, 833; Moore v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrydon v. City of Hermosa Beach
93 Cal. App. 615 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 23, 1928
(Strasser v. Moonelis, 108 N. Y. 611 [ 15 N. E. 730 ]; Pfohl v. Simpson, 59 N. Y. 174 ; Brown v. Cheese Assn., 59 N. Y. 242 ; Schneider v. City of Rochester, 155 N. Y. 619 [ 50 N. E. 291 ]; Buffington v. Harvey, 95 U. … (See Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274, 282 [ 57 Pac. 82 ].)
Cited 20 timesPublished243 Cal. App. 2d 689 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1966
The applicable rule is stated in Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. … (See Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. Hatton, supra, p. 859 ; City of Dunsmuir v. Silva, 154 Cal.App.2d 825, 828 [ 317 P.2d 653 ]; Morgan v. Veach, 59 Cal.App.2d 682, 688-689 [ 139 P.2d 976 ] Felsenthal v.
Cited 14 timesPublished56 Cal. App. 261 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1922
In Hatton v. Gregg, 4 Cal. App. 537 [ 88 Pac. 592 ], it is said: “Both upon reason and the authority of People v. … Code; 1 Corpus Juris, p. 704; City of Syracuse v. Roscoe, 66 Misc. Rep. 317 [ 123 N. Y. Supp. 403 ]; State v. Brown, 10 Or. 215 .)
Cited 18 timesPublishedSan Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of S.F.
California Court of Appeal · Sep 5, 2014
(Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 862.) … Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1915) 239 U.S. 441, 446 (Bi-Metallic) [distinguishing Londoner v.
Cited 0 timesPublished114 Cal. App. 2d 311 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1952
(Fox v. Workman, 6 Cal.App. 633 at 635 [ 92 P. 742 ]; McClatchy v. Matthews, 135 Cal. 274, 276 [ 67 P. 134 ]; Charles L. Donohoe Co. v. Superior Court, 79 Cal.App. 41, 44 [ 248 P. 1007 ]; Brown v. … State Personnel Board, 22 Cal.2d 198 [ 137 P.2d 433 ]; Abelleira v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedSan Bernardino Public Employees Ass'n v. City of Fontana
79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 634 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 1998
(Board of Administration v. Wilson (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1130 [ 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 207 ].) … on the board and a factor in their decision to retire].)
Cited 18 timesPublished204 Cal. App. 3d 1192 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 1988
(Finn v. G.D. Searle & Co., supra, 35 Cal.3d at p. 699 .) In Brown v. … In so ruling, Brown cited numerous cases which do not involve prescription drugs. (Dimond v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. (1976) 65 Cal.App.3d 173 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 895 ]; Bojorquez v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedG.I. Industries v. City of Thousand Oaks
California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 2022
Statutory Background (a) Brown Act The Brown Act begins with a declaration of purpose: “In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares that the public commissions, boards … They do not discuss whether the Brown Act applies. A case is not authority for issues it does not consider. (Contra Costa Water Dist. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide CA2/7
California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 2021
Filed 11/17/21 Brown v. … (Van v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished60 Cal. App. 4th 611 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1997
(Edison Co. v. Labor Board (1938) 305 U.S. 197, 225 [ 59 S.Ct. 206, 215 , 83 L.Ed. 126 ].) … Brown v. State Personnel Bd. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1151 [ 213 Cal.Rptr. 53 ] and Brooks v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna