Case law

Karpinski v. Smitty's Bar, Inc.

246 Cal. App. 4th 456 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 12, 2016

(Pfeiffer v. … (McBride v. Brown 2011 [WL 1566002].)”

Pac. Coast Eng. Co. v. State of California

111 Cal. App. 2d 31 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1952

Brown, Attorney General, Ernest P. Goodman and James E. Sabine, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent. *33 VAN DYKE, J. … board.

County of Kern v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

108 Cal. App. 3d 418 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1980

[See People v. Lawley (1911) 17 Cal.App. 331, 346-347 ( 119 P. 1089 ).] … (See Boyd v. Huntington (1932) 215 Cal. 473, 482 [ 11 P.2d 383 ]; Hammond v. McDonald (1939) 32 Cal.App.2d 187, 192 [ 89 P.2d 407 ]; cf. County of L.A. v. Southern Cal. Tel.

State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.

69 Cal. App. 3d 884 · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1977

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) denied a petition for reconsideration. … Board decisions before its enactment in 1945 had established that medical treatment did not include attention by a Christian Science practitioner (Ash v. Barker, 2 I.A.C. 40), a Chinese herb doctor (Knock v.

People v. Hernandez

148 Cal. App. 3d 560 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1983

(Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) 397 U.S. 254, 262-263 [ 25 L.Ed.2d 287, 295-296 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 ]; Randone v. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Work, J., concurred. 1 All statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise specified.

Reed v. Hollywood Professional School

169 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 887 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 1959

Stone v. Board of Directors of Pasadena (1941), 47 Cal.App.2d 749, 753 [ 118 P.2d 866 ]. … Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), 347 U.S. 483 [ 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 , 34 A.L.R.2d 1180 ]; Lucy v. Adams (1955), 350 U.S. 1 [ 76 S.Ct. 33 , 100 L.Ed. 3 ], See also 32 A.G. (1959), 264, 268.

Howard v. Burrow

77 Cal. App. 4 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1926

Zeimer v. Antisell, 75 Cal. 509, 512 [ 17 Pac. 642 ]. It has been frequently cited and followed since that time. (Brown v. Mason, 155 Cal. 155, 159 [21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 328, 99 Pac. 867 ].) … In the case of Fultz v. Wimer, 34 Kan. 576 , at page 580 [ 9 Pac. 316 ], the supreme court of Kansas answered just that question. Its language is quoted with approval in Brown v.

Canal Street, Ltd. v. Sorich

91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 811 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 13, 2000

Respondents rely on Varwig v. … (See Brown & Bryant, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 247, 255 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.2d 144 ] (Brown & Bryant, Inc); Malouf Bros. v.

American Civil Rights Foundation v. Berkeley Unified School District

172 Cal. App. 4th 207 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 2009

Racial integration of America’s public schools began with Brown v. … (Crawford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 Cal.3d 280, 294 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 551 P.2d 28 ].) A school board also has authority to adopt a school integration plan. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 7, subd. (a).)

United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. OAK GROVE UNION SCH. DIST. OF SONOMA CTY.

205 Cal. App. 2d 226 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1962

(Calhoun v. Huntington Park First Sav. & Loan Assn. (1960) 186 Cal.App.2d 451, 459-460 [ 9 Cal.Rptr. 479 ]; see also Sweeney v. Board of Trustees (1917) 33 Cal.App. 331 [ 165 P. 42 ].) … v.

Allen v. Gardner

142 Cal. App. 2d 467 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1956

Appointing Receiver” dated February 3, 1955, and signed March 2, 1955, modifying a previous order instructing the receiver appointed to take possession of the property of cross-defendants to satisfy a judgment (see Allen v.

Pacifica Firefighters Assn. v. City of Pacifica

California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 2022

(Unnamed Physician v. Board of Trustees (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 607, 618.) … (Totten v. Board of Supervisors (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 826, 833–834.)

Chavez v. Sprague

209 Cal. App. 2d 101 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 1962

(Ward v. Jones, 39 Cal.2d 756 [ 249 P.2d 246 ]; Rounds v. Brown, 121 Cal.App. 2d 642 [ 263 P.2d 620 ]; Henry v. City of Los Angeles, 114 Cal.App.2d 603 [ 250 P.2d 643 ].) … (Allen v. Los Angeles City Board of Education, 173 Cal.App.2d 126 [ 343 P.2d 170 ].)

People v. Blunt

186 Cal. App. 3d 1594 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1986

These provisions were applied to facts very similar to the present case in People v. Brown (1980) 107 Cal.App.3d 858 [ 166 Cal.Rptr. 144 ] (Fourth Dist., Div. Two). … Under Brown as approved by Atiles , the absence of a San Bernardino restraint is fatal to defendant’s claim to credit for the Los Angeles custody. People v.

In Re Marriage of Biddle

52 Cal. App. 4th 396 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1997

Biddle v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees (U.S. Dist. Ct. (N.D.Cal.), 1991, No. 91-CV-20618).) Three years later, the Biddles’ marriage of 21 years was dissolved. … (In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d 838, 846-847 .) The specifics of the division are for the trial court’s discretion. (See Fam.

Carlton v. Sevin-Vincent Seed Co.

129 Cal. App. 222 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1933

The facts found bring the case clearly within the doctrine declared in Brown v. … (Brown v. National Electric Works, supra.)

Tinsley v. Superior Court

150 Cal. App. 3d 90 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1983

Citing Dayton Board of Education v. … (Perry v. Jordan (1949) 34 Cal.2d 87, 94 [ 207 P.2d 47 ]; Brown v. Jordan (1938) 12 Cal.2d 75, 84 [ 82 P.2d 450 ]; Vandeleur v. Jordan (1938) 12 Cal.2d 71, 73 [ 82 P.2d 455 ]; Santa Cruz Oil Corp. v.

T.H. v. San Diego Unified School District

122 Cal. App. 4th 1267 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 2004

Brown-Dempsey (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 421, 432 [ 134 Cal.Rptr.2d 124 ].) … (See Woodbury v. Brown-Dempsey, supra, 108 Cal.App.4th at pp. 432-433 [school district could not make a blanket rule eliminating an expulsion hearing panel’s subpoena powers].)

Litchfield v. County of Marin

130 Cal. App. 2d 806 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1955

(City of Compton v. Boland, 26 Cal.2d 310 [ 158 P.2d 397 ]; Barrett v. Brown, 26 Cal.2d 328 [ 158 P.2d 567 ]; Peterson v. Johnson, 39 Cal.2d 745 [ 249 P.2d 17 ].) … (See Barrett v. Brown, supra, 26 Cal.2d 328, 330-331 .)

Hofman Ranch v. Yuba County Local Agency Formation Commission

172 Cal. App. 4th 805 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 2009

Brown Act (Brown Act) (Gov. Code, 1 § 54950.5 et seq.) requires “[a]ll meetings of the legislative body of a local agency [to] be open and public ... except as otherwise provided in this chapter.” (§ 54953, subd. (a).) … (Lucas v. Board of Trustees (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 988, 991-992 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 431 ].)