Case law

Long Beach City Employees Ass'n v. City of Long Beach

73 Cal. App. 3d 273 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1977

In Bagley , the court says at page 25: “The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. … Code, § 3505.1; see City and County of San Francisco v.

County of Kern v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

108 Cal. App. 3d 418 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1980

[See People v. Lawley (1911) 17 Cal.App. 331, 346-347 ( 119 P. 1089 ).] … (See Boyd v. Huntington (1932) 215 Cal. 473, 482 [ 11 P.2d 383 ]; Hammond v. McDonald (1939) 32 Cal.App.2d 187, 192 [ 89 P.2d 407 ]; cf. County of L.A. v. Southern Cal. Tel.

California School Employees Ass'n v. Santee School District

129 Cal. App. 3d 785 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 1982

While we are not obliged to apply literally all the various portions of the Education Code when they would present conflict or confusion (Horton v. … Judgment reversed. 4 Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Staniforth, J., concurred. Generally, classified employees are those employees of the school district whose positions do not require certification (see Ed.

Pac. Coast Eng. Co. v. State of California

111 Cal. App. 2d 31 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1952

Brown, Attorney General, Ernest P. Goodman and James E. Sabine, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent. *33 VAN DYKE, J. … board.

Metropolitan Water District v. Imperial Irrigation District

80 Cal. App. 4th 1403 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 2000

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 725 .) … In re Marriage of Damico, supra, 7 Cal.4th at pp. 679-680; Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 725 .)

In Re Spence

36 Cal. App. 3d 636 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 1974

There are bulletin boards at certain locations in the prison which show the names of inmates who will be meeting with the Adult Authority. … As we have held in Gee v. Brown (1974) (Cal.App.) * * the Gagnon [Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973) 411 U.S. 778 ( 36 L.Ed.2d 656 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 )] right to counsel does not extend to rescission hearings under Prewitt .

People v. Allgood

54 Cal. App. 3d 434 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 16, 1976

(People v. Browning, supra, 45 Cal.App.3d 125, 139 .) … People v. Browning, supra, 45 Cal.App.3d 125, 139 .)

Los Angeles Warehouse Co. v. County of Los Angeles

139 Cal. App. 368 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1934

(Sutro v. Pettit, 74 Cal. 332, 336 [ 16 Pac. 7 , 5 Am. St. Rep. 442 ]; Warren Bros. Co. v. Boyle, 42 Cal. App. 246, 260 [ 183 Pac. 706 ]; Foxen v. City of Santa Barbara, supra, p. 82.) … In that case, as did the Supreme Court in Brown v.

City and County of San Francisco v. Patterson

202 Cal. App. 3d 95 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 1988

(Brown v. City of Berkeley (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 223, 231 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 1 ].) And the provisions of a city charter respecting purely municipal affairs prevail over related state laws. (Baggett v. … “It is a familiar principle of law that no legislative board, by normal legislative enactment, may divest itself or future boards of the power to enact legislation within its competence. (See, e.g., Thompson v.

Durst v. County of Colusa

166 Cal. App. 2d 623 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1958

(Morrison v. Smith Bros., Inc., 211 Cal. 36 [ 293 P. 53 ]; Hanson v. City of Los Angeles, 63 Cal.App.2d 426 [ 147 P.2d 109 ]; Fox v. City of Pasadena, 78 F.2d 948 ; Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. … (Calkins v. Newton, supra; Latham v. Santa Clara County Hospital, supra.) Further this court rejected a like contention in an analogous situation in the ease of Grove v.

Pedro v. City of Los Angeles

229 Cal. App. 4th 87 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 25, 2014

(Fox, supra, 35 Cal.4th at p. 807; Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries (1994) 7 Cal.4th 926, 932.) This is because the identity of the wrongdoer is not an element of the cause of action. … (People v. Zamora (1976) 18 Cal.3d 538, 561-562.) The Court of Appeal in Debro v.

Dickenson v. Kallusch

91 Cal. App. 141 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 1928

(Preluzsky v. Pacific etc. Co., 195 Cal. 290 [ 232 Pac. 970 ].) … (Himmelman v. Henry et al., 84 Cal. 104 [ 23 Pac. 1098 ]; Cutting Co., etc., v. Canty, 141 Cal. 692 [ 75 Pac. 564 ].) The findings made are sufficient to support the judgment.

Polk v. Franchise Tax Board CA2/8

California Court of Appeal · Mar 17, 2025

Filed 3/17/25 Polk v. … No. 22BBCV00511 v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Margaret L. Oldendorf, Judge. Affirmed.

In Re Marriage of Foster

180 Cal. App. 3d 1068 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1986

(See Berry v. Board of Retirement (1972) 23 Cal.App.3d 757, 758-759 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 549 ].) … . § 856 ; see In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d at p. 842; 2 Markey, Cal. Family Law Practice and Procedure, Dissolution of Marriage, § 24.24, pp. 24-34.1; see, e.g., Bensing v.

Myers v. Arcata Union High Sch. Dist.

269 Cal. App. 2d 549 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 10, 1969

(Board of Education v. … The importance of an education to a child is substantial (see, e.g., Brown v.

In Re Carabes

144 Cal. App. 3d 927 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 1983

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … Discussion In Bunnell v.

San Bernardino County Sheriff's Employees' Benefit Ass'n v. San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors

7 Cal. App. 4th 602 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1992

The County of San Bernardino and its board of supervisors (Board) 1 appeal from a judgment in a writ of mandate action. … The court in Redondo Beach Police Officers Assn. v.

Nevens v. City of Chino

233 Cal. App. 2d 775 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1965

Brown Act (Gov. … Brown (B. M.), J., deeming himself disqualified, did not participate.

In Re DeLuna

24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 643 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 3, 2005

(Brown v. Poole (9th Cir. 2003) 337 F.3d 1155, 1159-1161 .) We also assume for the sake of discussion that the district attorney is a party to these habeas corpus proceedings. … (People v. Dickerson (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1374, 1386 [ 19 Cal.Rptr.3d 545 ].) B.

Tinsley v. Superior Court

150 Cal. App. 3d 90 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1983

Citing Dayton Board of Education v. … (Perry v. Jordan (1949) 34 Cal.2d 87, 94 [ 207 P.2d 47 ]; Brown v. Jordan (1938) 12 Cal.2d 75, 84 [ 82 P.2d 450 ]; Vandeleur v. Jordan (1938) 12 Cal.2d 71, 73 [ 82 P.2d 455 ]; Santa Cruz Oil Corp. v.