Case law

Asociacion de Gente Unida por el Agua v. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board

210 Cal. App. 4th 1255 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 2012

(Margolin v. Shemaria (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 891, 895 [ 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 502 ].) … The administrative record contains a report prepared by Brown, Vence & Associates (BVA) for the San Jose State University Foundation, under agreement with the State Board.

People v. City of Los Angeles

62 Cal. App. 781 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 7, 1923

v. … Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 278 [ 57 Pac. 82 ], is authority for the rule that “the adoption of the order is a determination by the board that the public interest or convenience requires the improvement.”

People v. Camp

10 Cal. App. 3d 651 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 1970

(Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., supra, 58 Cal.2d 601, 604-606 .)” (See also Arenstein v. California State Board of Pharmacy, 265 Cal.App.2d 179, 189-191 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 357 ].) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Whelan, J., concurred.

In Re the Marriage of Nice

230 Cal. App. 3d 444 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 1991

(Waite v. Waite (1972) 6 Cal.3d 461, 473 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 325 , 492 P.2d 13 ]; Bowman v. Bowman, supra, 171 Cal.App.3d 148, 152 .) … (In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 848, fn. 10 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 , 94 A.L.R.3d 164 ].)

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Walls

178 Cal. App. 2d 284 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1960

State Board of Optometry, 35 Cal.App.2d 428 [ 95 P.2d 959 ]; Beloin v. … Zylstra, 5 Cal.App.2d 297, 300 [ 42 P.2d 685 ] ; Davis v. Renton, 113 Cal.App. 561, 564-565 [ 298 P. 834 ]; People v. Brown, 49 Cal.2d 577, 585-586 [ 320 P.2d 5 ].)

Wall v. State of California

73 Cal. App. 2d 838 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 5, 1946

(Board of Directors v. Nye, 8 Cal. App. 527 [ 97 P. 208 ] ; Veterans’ Welfare Board v. Riley, 189 Cal. 159 [ 208 P. 678 , 22 A.L.R. 153 ] ; Veterans’ Welfare Board v. … (Barrett v. Brown, 26 Cal.2d 328 [158 P. 2d 567] ; City of Compton v. Boland, supra; Penaat v. Terwilliger, 23 Cal.2d 865 - [ 147 P.2d 552 ].) Judgment and order affirmed. Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.

Mason v. City of Los Angeles

130 Cal. App. 224 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 2, 1933

Section 71 provides that such departments “shall be under the control and management of a board of five commissioners”. … (Burroughs v. Eastman, 93 Mich. 433 [ 53 N. W. 532 ]; Brown v. Uhr, (Tex. Civ. App.) 187 S. W. 381 .)

Alta-Dena Dairy v. County of San Diego

271 Cal. App. 2d 66 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1969

(Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ]; Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors, supra, 13 Cal.2d 75, 84 .) … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred.

San Pablo Ave Golden Gate Improvement Assn v. City Council Oakland

California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 2024

Board of Permit Appeals (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 1099, 1106–1110 [appeals board cannot issue permit where density violation was not in dispute and evidence negated prior nonconforming use]; Johnston v. … Board of Supervisors (1947) 31 Cal.2d 66, 73–74 [Board of Supervisors is bound by terms of ordinance when issuing a use permit], disapproved on other grounds by Bailey v. Los Angeles County (1956) 46 Cal.2d 132, 139.)

People v. Norwood

26 Cal. App. 3d 148 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1972

Board of Supervisors (1960) 181 Cal.App.2d 133, 142 [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 294 ].) … Defendant denied knowing Randolph Brown, Mrs. Emma Brown, or Frank Gentile.

People v. Serna

71 Cal. App. 3d 229 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1977

Similar contentions have been made, and rejected, in another jurisdiction (State v. … In the pioneer case of Brown v.

Universal By-Products, Inc. v. City of Modesto

43 Cal. App. 3d 145 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1974

(See Brown v. City of Los Angeles, 267 Cal.App.2d 849 [ 73 Cal.Rptr. 364 ].) Other statutory immunities are available to respondent. … Brown (G. A.), P.

McFall v. Madera Unified School District

222 Cal. App. 3d 1228 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1990

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), J. * Wallace L. … As noted in Jones v.

Ahrentzen v. Westburg

263 Cal. App. 2d 749 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 9, 1968

The jury could well have concluded that plaintiff came to a stop behind the Brown car and that her ear was then struck from the rear by the defendant’s ear and shoved into the Brown car. *751 Appellant attempted to argue … (Estate of Arstein, 56 Cal.2d 239 [ 14 Cal.Rptr. 809 , 364 P.2d 33 ] ; Crawford v. Southern Pac. Co., 3 Cal.2d 427 [ 45 P.2d 183 ].) As said in Carrasco v.

Aguirre v. Lee

20 Cal. App. 4th 1646 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1993

(Browning-F erris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 859 [ 226 Cal.Rptr. 575 ].) The Lees presented a petition to the board but would not pay a processing fee. … The petition was returned to them by the board. As they have not perfected a petition to the rent board on their application for an exemption, we have no jurisdiction to consider this claim. V.

City of King City v. Thommarson

8 Cal. App. 3d 651 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1970

Skinner v. City of Santa Rosa, 107 Cal. 464 [ 40 P. 742 ]; Peery v. City of Los Angeles, 187 Cal. 753 [ 203 P.2d 992 , 19 A.L.R. 1044 ]). … Brown (H. C.), J., and Caldecott, J., concurred.

City of Oakland Ex Rel. Board of Port Commissioners v. United Public Employees, Local 390

179 Cal. App. 3d 356 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1986

The City of Oakland (City), acting by and through its Board of Port Commissioners, appeals from a judgment confirming an award made in a labor arbitration proceeding between appellant and respondent United Public Employees … (Morris v. Zuckerman (1968) 69 *364 Cal.2d 686, 691 [ 72 Cal.Rptr. 880 , 446 P.2d 1000 ]; Rodrigues v. Keller (1980) 113 Cal.App.3d 838, 843 [ 170 Cal.Rptr. 349 ]; Safeway Stores, Inc. v.

Long Beach City Employees Ass'n v. City of Long Beach

73 Cal. App. 3d 273 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1977

In Bagley , the court says at page 25: “The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. … Code, § 3505.1; see City and County of San Francisco v.

In Re Spence

36 Cal. App. 3d 636 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 1974

There are bulletin boards at certain locations in the prison which show the names of inmates who will be meeting with the Adult Authority. … As we have held in Gee v. Brown (1974) (Cal.App.) * * the Gagnon [Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973) 411 U.S. 778 ( 36 L.Ed.2d 656 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 )] right to counsel does not extend to rescission hearings under Prewitt .

Bodell Construction Co. v. Trustees of the California State University

62 Cal. App. 4th 1508 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 1998

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., supra, 51 Cal.2d at p. 645 .) … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., supra, 51 Cal.2d at p. 645 .)