Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.55s

  • In Re the Marriage of Nice

    230 Cal. App. 3d 444 · California Court of Appeal · May 23, 1991

    (Waite v. Waite (1972) 6 Cal.3d 461, 473 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 325 , 492 P.2d 13 ]; Bowman v. Bowman, supra, 171 Cal.App.3d 148, 152 .) … (In re Marriage of Brown (1976) 15 Cal.3d 838, 848, fn. 10 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 544 P.2d 561 , 94 A.L.R.3d 164 ].)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • James Eva Estate v. Oakland B. M. Co.

    40 Cal. App. 515 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1919

    Dec. 300 ]; Morgan v. Board of Education, 136 Cal. 245 , 247, [ 68 P. 703 ]; Brown v. Board of Education, 103 Cal. 531 , 534, [ 37 P. 503 ].) [5] With the above principles in mind, we take up the record before us. … Under such general powers a corporation may, in furtherance of its own interests, extend financial aid to its customers. ( Armour Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Kuigoua v. Board of Registered Nursing CA3

    California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 2026

    Filed 2/11/26 Kuigoua v. … (Rand v. Board of Psychology (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 565, 575.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Loftis v. Superior Court

    25 Cal. App. 2d 346 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1938

    In Glide v. … Until a board of supervisors acts no such area is formed. A voluntary tuberculosis control area is an entity -entirely separate and *356 apart from a state tuberculosis control area. (Coelho v. Truckell, supra.)

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Guerra v. WCAB

    California Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2016

    ADJ8899793) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and PORCINI INC., et al., Respondents. PROCEEDINGS to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. … (Brown v. Industrial Acci. Com. (1941) 44 Cal.App.2d 6, 13.) The inferences drawn by Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Friends of the Eel River v. N. Coast RR. Auth.

    California Court of Appeal · Sep 29, 2014

    Plaintiffs, who were members of the public, filed an action for violation of the Brown Act and breach of contract, alleging the nonprofit corporation’s board of directors had not followed appropriate Brown Act procedures … (New York v. United States (1992) 505 U.S. 144, 155-156; see Board of County Comrs. v. U.S. E.E.O.C. (10th Cir. 2005) 405 F.3d 840, 847, 850.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moran v. OSO VALLEY GREENBELT ASS'N

    111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 636 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 6, 2001

    (Bailey v. Taaffe (1866) 29 Cal. 422, 424 .) An exercise of discretion is subject to reversal on appeal where no reasonable basis for the action is shown. (Common Cause v. … In Common Cause v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. State Personnel Board CA3

    California Court of Appeal · Aug 27, 2015

    Filed 8/27/15 Johnston v. … (Young v. Gannon (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 209, 224-225 (Young).) We presume that the Board performed its duty.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Payne v. De Vaughn

    77 Cal. App. 399 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1926

    at the trial that, although he had been preparing plans and specifications and supervising construction work for about ten years, and was “doing it every day,” he did not have, and had never had, a license from the state board … (Pride v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 9 Ala. App. 334 [ 63 South. 803 ] ; Hittson v. Browne, 3 Colo. 304 ; Zimmerman, v. Brown, 30 Idaho, 640 [ 166 Pac. 924 ]; Hughes v. Dougherty, 62 Ill. App. 464 ; Draper v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Estate of Anderson

    60 Cal. App. 4th 436 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1997

    Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567 , 581 [ 108 Cal.Rptr. 293 ] .) … [Citations.]"'" ( Estate of Davis (1940) 38 Cal.App.2d 579 , 584 [ 102 P.2d 545 ], as quoted in Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Acme Steel v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

    218 Cal. App. 4th 1137 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 2013

    Filed 7/16/13 Acme Steel v. … (See Ogilvie v. Workers’ Comp.

    Cited 5 timesUnpublished
  • City of Oakland Ex Rel. Board of Port Commissioners v. United Public Employees, Local 390

    179 Cal. App. 3d 356 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1986

    The City of Oakland (City), acting by and through its Board of Port Commissioners, appeals from a judgment confirming an award made in a labor arbitration proceeding between appellant and respondent United Public Employees … (Morris v. Zuckerman (1968) 69 *364 Cal.2d 686, 691 [ 72 Cal.Rptr. 880 , 446 P.2d 1000 ]; Rodrigues v. Keller (1980) 113 Cal.App.3d 838, 843 [ 170 Cal.Rptr. 349 ]; Safeway Stores, Inc. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Unjian v. Berman

    208 Cal. App. 3d 881 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1989

    Brown v. Bleiberg (1982) 32 Cal.3d 426, 435-438 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 228 , 651 P.2d 815 ].) … (See, e.g., Enfield v. Hunt (1979) 91 Cal.App.3d 417, 422-423 [ 154 Cal.Rptr. 146 ]; Brown v. Bleiberg, supra, 32 Cal.3d at p.438; Kilburn v. Pineda (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 1046, 1049-1050 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 548 ].) Dr.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Buratti v. Phetteplace

    196 Cal. App. 2d 303 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1961

    Thereafter the “brown coat” of plaster was applied to the outside of the building. Several weeks thereafter the “finish coat” was applied. … (Odell v. Frueh, 146 Cal.App.2d 504 [ 304 P.2d 45 ]; People v. Ely, 203 Cal. 628, 632-633 [ 265 P. 818 ]; Larramendy v. Myres, 126 Cal.App.2d 636, 642 [ 272 P.2d 824 ].)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Imperial Irrigation District v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity Group

    95 Cal. App. 3d 317 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 24, 1979

    Leal under an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) for compensation awarded for “serious and willful misconduct.” The trial court found for the District and entered judgment for $9,333.39. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Buttermore, J., * concurred.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Long Beach City Employees Ass'n v. City of Long Beach

    73 Cal. App. 3d 273 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1977

    In Bagley , the court says at page 25: “The Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. … Code, § 3505.1; see City and County of San Francisco v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lyon v. Master Holding Corp.

    50 Cal. App. 2d 238 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1942

    (Scott v. Stuart, 190 Cal. 526 [ 213 Pac. 947 ].) … (McNeill & Co. v. Doe, 163 Cal. 338, 341 [ 125 Pac. 345 ] ; Brown v. San Francisco Savings Union, 122 Cal. 648 [ 55 Pac. 598 ].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Universal By-Products, Inc. v. City of Modesto

    43 Cal. App. 3d 145 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1974

    (See Brown v. City of Los Angeles, 267 Cal.App.2d 849 [ 73 Cal.Rptr. 364 ].) Other statutory immunities are available to respondent. … Brown (G. A.), P.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Mosk v. Summerland Spiritualist Assn.

    225 Cal. App. 2d 376 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1964

    In Brown v. … (County of Yolo v. Barney, 79 Cal. 375 [ 21 P. 833 , 12 Am.St.Rep. 152 ]; Board of Education v. Martin, 92 Cal. 209 [ 28 P. 799 ].)

    Declined to follow by Hagman v. Meher Mount Corp., 215 Cal. App. 4th 82 (2013)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mart v. Severson

    115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 717 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 2002

    (Brown v. Allied Corrugated Box. Co. (1979) 91 Cal.App.3d 477 [ 154 Cal.Rptr. 170 ] (Brown).) Brown involved a fair value determination conducted pursuant to former section 4659, the predecessor statute to section 2000. … (Brown, supra, 91 Cal.App.3d at p. 480, fn. 2 .)

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.