Case law

Tischauser v. City of Newport Beach

225 Cal. App. 2d 138 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 1964

BROWN (Gerald), J. Plaintiffs represent eight owners of lots bordering the south side of Edgewater Avenue in the City of Newport Beach, California. … It was not rejected by the board of supervisors.

People v. Jones

176 Cal. App. 3d 120 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 1985

(See Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855, 862, fn. 2 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ].) … (Brown v. Merlo, supra, 8 Cal.3d 855, 861 .)

County of Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning v. Superior Court

208 Cal. App. 4th 1264 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 28, 2012

Brown, Arthur Lee Neal, Sr., and Bernard Harper. We conclude the superior court erred in refusing to vacate its expert appointment order and issue a peremptory writ of mandate directing it to do so. … (Corenevsky v. Superior Court (1984) 36 Cal.3d 307, 321 [ 204 Cal.Rptr. 165 , 682 P.2d 360 ].)

Estate of Wilson

116 Cal. App. 2d 523 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 1953

Brown, executor of the estate. … (Estate of Da Roza, 82 Cal.App.2d 550, 555-556 [ 186 P.2d 725 ]; Tennant v. Civil Service Com., 77 Cal.App.2d 489, 497-498 [ 175 P.2d 568 ]; Trigueiro v. Skow, 24 Cal.App.2d 253, 254-256 [ 74 P.2d 836 ]; People v.

Smith v. Indus. Accident Comm'n of Cal.

26 Cal. App. 560 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1915

(Corea v. Higuera, 153 Cal. 451 , [17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1018, 95 Pac. 882 ] ; People v. McCue, 150 Cal. 195 , [ 88 Pac. 899 ].) … There is nothing to indicate that this brief visit to the boarding-house was at all out of the ordinary, or was inconsistent with his duty to his employer.” (North Carolina R. R. Co. v. Zachary, 232 U. S. 248 , [Ann.

Jones v. Omnitrans

125 Cal. App. 4th 273 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 2004

(Phillips v. State Personnel Bd., supra, 184 Cal.App.3d at p. 654 .) Phillips appealed the determination to the State Personnel Board. The board dismissed the appeal without a hearing. … Similarly, Brown v. City of Los Angeles (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 155, 172-173 , footnote 10 [ 125 Cal.Rptr.2d 474 ] and Giuffre v.

Zany v. Rawhide Gold Mining Co.

15 Cal. App. 373 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1911

(Curtis v. Richards, 9 Cal. 38.) *376 And in such a case, the defendant should, at least, show how it happened that he was without knowledge as to such facts. (Brown v. Scott, 25 Cal. 190 .) … (Doll v. Good, 38 Cal. 290 .) In Hewel v. Hogin, 3 Cal.

Feld v. Western Land & Development Co.

2 Cal. App. 4th 1328 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1992

(Gibbs v. Haight, Dickson, Brown & Bonesteel (1986) 183 Cal.App.3d 716, 719 [ 228 Cal.Rptr. 398 ].) … A-Mark Coin Co., Inc., supra, 202 Cal.App.3d 330, and Gibbs v. Haight, Dickson, Brown & Bonesteel, supra, 183 Cal.App.3d 716 . Citing Friedman v.

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement System

89 Cal. App. 3d 766 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1979

(Board of Administration v. Ames (1963) 215 Cal.App.2d 215, 230 [ 29 Cal.Rptr. 917 ].) … (Board of Administration v. Kuppens (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 758, 763 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 856 ].)

Myers v. City Council of Pismo Beach

241 Cal. App. 2d 237 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 1966

In Mitchell v. … (Mueller v. Brown, 221 Cal.App.2d 319 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 474 ].) Petitioners’ reliance on Hunt v. Riverside, 31 Cal.2d 619 [ 191 P.2d 426 ], and Atlas Hotels, Inc. v.

Larson v. City of Redondo Beach

27 Cal. App. 3d 332 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1972

(Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals (1943) 23 Cal.2d 303, 315 [ 144 P.2d 4 ]; Faulkner v. Cal. Toll Bridge Authority (1953) 40 Cal.2d 317, 326 [ 253 P.2d 659 ].) … Quinn (1948) 31 Cal.2d 661, 664 [ 192 P.2d 17 ]; Browning v. Dow (1923) 60 Cal.App. 680, 682 [ 213 P. 707 ]); and (2) a clear, present and beneficial right in the petitioner to the performance of that duty (Parker v.

In Re Gray

85 Cal. App. 3d 255 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1978

(In re Brown (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 647, 652 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 549 ].) … As the court observed in People v.

Cross v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

11 Cal. App. 5th 305 · California Court of Appeal · May 1, 2017

of medical records [is] within the purview of the privacy amendment”]; Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. … (Whitney v.

Umansky v. Urquhart

84 Cal. App. 3d 368 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 29, 1978

United States Shipping Board E. F. Corp. (2d Cir. 1931) 53 F.2d 359, 361 .) “Process,” interpreted broadly (see Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn., supra, at p. 104, fn. 4), does include the filing of a complaint. … Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Staniforth, J., concurred. 1 We do not address the issue of whether Umansky has an action for malicious prosecution.

Papelian v. State of California

65 Cal. App. 3d 958 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 28, 1976

In Elson v. … v.

California State Employees' v. State of Calif.

199 Cal. App. 3d 840 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1988

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ].) That judgment is entitled to significant weight and deference. … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 184, fn. 8 .)

Hastings v. Department of Corrections

2 Cal. Rptr. 3d 329 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 22, 2003

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168 , 181-184 and fns. 6-8 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ] (Brown).) … (Pinion v. State Personnel Board (1938) 29 Cal.App.2d 314, 319-320 [ 84 P.2d 185 ]; Allen v. State Board of Equalization (1941) 43 Cal.App.2d 90, 93-94 [ 110 P.2d 73 ].)

California School Employees Ass'n v. Governing Board of East Side Union High School District

193 Cal. App. 4th 540 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 2011

(Miller v. State of California (1977) 18 Cal.3d 808, 813 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 386 , 557 P.2d 970 ]; Page v. … Tucker v.

County of San Diego v. Lafayette Steel Co.

164 Cal. App. 3d 690 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1985

In late 1981, after the law suit was at issue, the County sent Lafayette a 1978 supplementary tax bill reflecting increased rates mandated by Board of Supervisors v. … City etc. of San Francisco, supra, 2 Cal.3d 984, 990 ; Virtue Bros. v. County of Los Angeles, supra, 239 Cal.App.2d 220, 232 ). Judgment affirmed. Brown (Gerald), P.

Ensign Bickford Realty Corp. v. City Council

68 Cal. App. 3d 467 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1977

(Wilkins v. City of San Bernardino (1946) 29 Cal.2d 332, 337, 338-339 [ 175 P.2d 542 ]; Miller v. Board of Public Works, supra, at p. 490; Town of Los Altos Hills v. … (See Van Sicklen v. Browne (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 122 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 786 ].)