Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscalctapp

10,000+ results

1.56s

  • City of Hayward v. United Public Employees Local 390, Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO

    54 Cal. App. 3d 761 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 23, 1976

    Helsby (1971) 68 Misc.2d 952 [ 327 N.Y.S.2d 909 ], affd. (1973) 42 App.Div. 265 [ 346 N.Y.S.2d 39 ]; Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Zelem (1974) 329 A.2d 477 .) … (Id., at p. 751; Labor Board v. General Motors (1963) 373 U.S. 734, 743 [ 10 L.Ed.2d 670, 676 , 83 S.Ct. 1453 ].) The provisos permitting union security arrangements were enacted by Congress in 1935 and 1947.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Coalition for Reasonable Regulation of Naturally Occurring Substances v. California Air Resources Board

    19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 635 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 2004

    (c); Sierra Club v. State Bd. of Forestry (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1215 .) … (See Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization (1998) 19 Cal.4th 1, 11 [ 78 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 , 960 P.2d 1031 ]; Communities for a Better Environment v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Concerned Citizens of Murphys v. Jackson

    72 Cal. App. 3d 1021 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1977

    (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; People v. … In further support of their contention, Calaveras cites us to Plum v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Collins v. City & County of San Francisco

    112 Cal. App. 2d 719 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 18, 1952

    (Weiss v. Garofalo, 89 Cal.App.2d 811 [ 201 P.2d 845 ]; Hardy v. San Fernando Valley C. of C., 99 Cal.App.2d 572 [222 P.2d 314]; Sturgeon v. City of Hawthorne, 106 Cal.App. 352 [289 P. 229]; Cornic v. … City etc. of San Francisco, 18 Cal.2d 718 [ 177 P.2d 657 ]; Brown v. Boyd, 33 Cal.App.2d 416 [ 91 P.2d 926 ].

    Cited 78 timesPublished
  • Arthur v. Oceanside-Carlsbad Junior College District

    216 Cal. App. 2d 656 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1963

    (Rible v. Hughes, supra, 24 Cal.2d 437, 445 ; Weiss v. State Board of Equalization, 40 Cal.2d 772, 775-776 [ 256 P.2d 1 ]; Cranford v. Jordan, supra, 7 Cal.2d 465, 467 ; Torres v. … J., and Brown (G.), J., concurred.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re Marriage of Andreen

    76 Cal. App. 3d 667 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 9, 1978

    (Benson v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 355, 362 [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 257 , 384 P.2d 649 ]; see also Phillipson v. Board of Administration (1970) 3 Cal.3d 32, 42-43 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 61 , 473 P.2d 765 ]; Waite v. … Although our course is not crystal clear, stare decisis impels us to adhere to Benson v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • People v. Wiedersperg

    44 Cal. App. 3d 550 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1975

    v. … (Meyer v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 34 Cal.2d at p. 65 .)

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Pinnacle Holdings, Inc. v. Simon

    31 Cal. App. 4th 1430 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1995

    (Smith v. County of Kern (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1826, 1829-1830 [ 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 716 ]; Stanson v. Brown (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 812, 814 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 862 ].) … (Reyes v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 196 Cal.App.3d 1263, 1271 .)

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Philbrick v. Weinberger

    228 Cal. App. 2d 681 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 27, 1964

    (George v. City of Los Angeles (1942) 51 Cal.App.2d 311 [ 124 P.2d 872 ].) … Palmer v. Financial Indem. Co. (1963) 215 Cal.App.2d 419 [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 204 ]; Ragusano v. Civic Center Hospital Foundation (1962) 199 Cal.App.2d 586 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 118 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Burke, P.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of California State University v. Superior Court of San Diego County

    132 Cal. App. 4th 889 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 14, 2005

    (GC Micro Corp. v. … (Register Div. of Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Cerini v. City of Cloverdale

    191 Cal. App. 3d 1471 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1987

    (Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners (1972) 7 Cal.3d 64, 73 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 768 , 496 P.2d 840 ]; CEEED v. … Ill Did 69-81 Invalidate the Board’s Authority? Cerini argues that resolution 69-81 was void because it violated the “meet and confer requirement” of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMB Act) (§ 3500 et seq.).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Posey v. Leavitt

    229 Cal. App. 3d 1236 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1991

    (Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. Hatton, supra, 61 Cal.2d 855 ; D’Andrea v. Pringle (1966) 243 Cal.App.2d 689 [ 52 Cal.Rptr. 606 ]; Christensen v. Tucker, supra, 114 Cal.App.2d 554 .) … (Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. Hatton (1964) 61 Cal.2d 855, 858 ; 5 Miller & Starr, Cal.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Stribling's Nurseries, Inc. v. County of Merced

    232 Cal. App. 2d 759 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1965

    Emirzian, 177 Cal. 493, 496 [ 171 P. 90 ]; Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors, 168 Cal.App.2d 559 [ 335 P.2d 976 ].) … Precisely this question was before the court in the ease of Jackson & Perkins Co. v. Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • John Morrell & Co. v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.

    254 Cal. App. 2d 455 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1967

    BROWN (H. C.), J. … Co. v. California Emp. Com., 17 Cal.2d 321 [ 109 P.2d 935 ]; Ruberoid Co. v. California Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board, 59 Cal.2d 73 [ 27 Cal.Rptr. 878 , 378 P.2d 102 ]; Bunny’s Waffle Shop, Inc. v. California Emp.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Botos

    27 Cal. App. 3d 774 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 15, 1972

    Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. Defendant Sharon Glea Botos appeals her court-tried conviction of transporting marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11531) and possessing marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530.5). … Because Wenger met the hijacker profile, an airline ticket agent stopped him at Gate 8 before boarding his flight.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Lowe

    31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 2005

    Lowe’s situation is distinguishable from Brown v. Poole (9th Cir. 2003) 337 F.3d 1155 , a case in which the Ninth Circuit ordered specific performance of a prisoner’s plea agreement. … (Graham v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Hamm v. City of Santa Ana

    273 Cal. App. 2d 84 · California Court of Appeal · May 16, 1969

    (Matteson v. Board of Education, 104 Cal.App. 647 [286 P.482].) … (People v. Porter, 6 Cal. 26 ; French v. Board of Education, 265 Cal.App.2d 955 [ 71 Cal.Rptr. 713 ]; Thompson v. Brown, 75 Cal.App.2d 344 [ 170 P.2d 1010 ]; Shade v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Vebr v. Culp

    241 Cal. App. 4th 1044 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 2015

    (Fernandez v. Lawson (2003) 31 Cal.4th 31, 40 (conc. opn. of Brown, J.).) … (Brown v. Poway Unified School Dist. (1993) 4 Cal.4th 820, 825-826.) Here, the undisputed facts show the cause of Vebr’s fall is a mystery.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Paulsen v. Local No. 856 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    193 Cal. App. 4th 823 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 2011

    The law established the Educational Employment Relations Board (EERB), which in 1977 *829 was renamed the Public Employment Relations Board. [Citation.] … We recognize that the Court of Appeal in Andrews v. Board of Supervisors (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 274, 283 [ 184 Cal.Rptr. 542 ] (Andrews), concluded the MMBA does not include an implied duty of fair representation.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re Stoneroad

    215 Cal. App. 4th 596 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 2013

    v. … Brown, at p. 1051, fn. 47.)

    Cited 39 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.