Case law

In Re Marriage of Carnall

216 Cal. App. 3d 1010 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1989

(Chirmside v. Board of Administration (1983) 143 Cal.App.3d 205, 208 [ 191 Cal.Rptr. 605 ], fn. omitted.) The terminable interest rule was criticized by courts and commentators. … (Chirmside v.

Roberts v. Packard, Packard & Johnson

217 Cal. App. 4th 822 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 3, 2013

The net award to Brown was $663,293. Brown appealed. (Frog Creek, at p. 523.) … Finally, if a party is dissatisfied with the award of the arbitrator, the court may correct or vacate it.‖ (California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Board (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 393, 399, citations omitted.)

People v. Carranza

California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2019

(See People v. … (See People v.

Fillerup v. Franchise Tax Board CA3

California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 2024

Filed 12/11/24 Fillerup v. … (Wolf v.

Leahey v. Department of Water & Power

76 Cal. App. 2d 281 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1946

Proc., § 1085 ; Lotts v. Board of Park Comrs., 13 Cal.App.2d 625, 634 [ 57 P.2d 215 ] ; Shannon v. … Proc., § 338, subd. 1 ; Curtin v. Board of Police Comrs., 74 Cal.App. 77, 82 [ 239 P. 355 ] ; Jones v. Board of Police Comrs., 141 Cal. 96, 98 [ 74 P. 696 ] ; Wittman v.

Gutosky v. City of Garden Grove

223 Cal. App. 2d 765 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1963

(Paterson v. Board of Trustees, 157 Cal.App.2d 811, 817 [ 321 P.2d 825 ].) … As the board was without authority in the premises, the theories of ratification and estoppel were not applicable. (Paterson v. Board of Trustees, 157 Cal.App.2d 811, 817 [ 321 P.2d 825 ].)

Boyle v. City of Redondo Beach

70 Cal. App. 4th 1109 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1999

The Brown Act The purpose of the Brown Act is to facilitate public participation in local government decisions and to curb misuse of democratic process by secret legislation by public bodies. (Cohan v. … (Morcos v. Board of Retirement (1990) 51 Cal.3d 924, 929 [ 275 Cal.Rptr. 187 , 800 P.2d 543 ].)

Dey v. Continental Central Credit

170 Cal. App. 4th 721 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 2008

In finding the collection fee here legal, the court relied on Brown v. … (Brown, at p. 536.)

Muir v. Steinberg

197 Cal. App. 2d 264 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1961

City of Susanville v. Lee C. … Brown, J., and Stone, J., concurred.

La Verne Ramsden v. W. Union

71 Cal. App. 3d 873 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1977

. *880 (Collins v. Owens, supra, at pp. 715, 718 ; Kaufman v. Brown, supra, at pp. 511, 512 .) … (Kaufman v. Brown, supra.)

People v. Reddick

176 Cal. App. 2d 806 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1959

The court in People v. … As stated in People v.

Huntington Beach Union High School District v. Collins

202 Cal. App. 2d 677 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1962

Proc., § 1963, subds. 15, 33; Bringle v. Board of Supervisors, 54 Cal.2d 86, 89 [ 351 P.2d 765 ]; McDowd v. Pig’n Whistle Corp., 26 Cal.2d 696, 699 [ 160 P.2d 797 ]; Lavine v. … In Board of Education v.

Groch v. City of Berkeley

118 Cal. App. 3d 518 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1981

App.3d 306, 326, fn. 15 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 315 ]; Van Sicklen v. Browne (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 122, 127 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 786 ]; Mitcheltree v. City of Los Angeles (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 791, 797 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 76 ]; Stoddard v. … Board of Supervisors (1970) 11 Cal.App.3d 768, 776 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 88 , 43 A.L.R.3d 880 ]; Stoddard v.

Lubey v. City and County of San Francisco

98 Cal. App. 3d 340 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1979

(Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S. 624, 628 [ 51 L.Ed.2d 92, 97 , 97 S.Ct. 882 ]; Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, pp. 578-579 [33 L.Ed.2d pp. 561-562]; Bogacki v. Board of Supervisors, supra, pp. 782-783; McNeill v. … (Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v.

Doukmedjian v. Emerson

82 Cal. App. 2d 510 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1947

This is an appeal by Lnra Brown Emerson, widow of Henry K. … The parts of the will pertinent to the sole question presented to us for decision are as follows: “Third: I give, devise and bequeath to my said wife, Lura Brown Emerson, an undivided one-half (%) interest in and to all of

Byrne v. Rule

California Court of Appeal · Aug 19, 2025

Strathmann v. Acacia Research Corp. (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 487, 499; see Cruz v. … (See Schifando v.

Lawing v. Faull

227 Cal. App. 2d 23 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 30, 1964

(Brougher v. Board of Public Works, 205 Cal. 426, 437 [ 271 P. 487 ].) … Brown v.

Kelley v. Kelley

73 Cal. App. 3d 672 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 1977

In Sutphin v. … In re Marriage of Brown, supra, 15 Cal.3d 838, 842 ), as to which there was no question of divisibility on dissolution of marriage when this case arose (Phillipson v.

People v. Fowler

30 Cal. App. 183 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1916

On being shown the brown hat he admitted it was his. … (People v. Meyers, 5 Cal. App. 674 , [ 91 Pac. 167 ].) The judgment and order are affirmed. Lennon, P. J., and Richards, J., concurred.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Crawford

204 Cal. App. 2d 557 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1962

(See also Hogan v. … Code, § 1555; Browne v. Superior Court, 16 Cal.2d 593 [ 107 P.2d 1 , 131 A.L.R. 276]; Guardianship of O'Connor, 28 Cal.App.2d 527 [ 83 P.2d 65 ]; Keck v.