Case law

Slyter v. Clinton Construction Co.

107 Cal. App. 348 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 1930

(Green v. Soule, 145 Cal. 96 [ 78 Pac. 337 ]; Brown v. Board of Trustees, 41 Cal. App. 100 -108 [ 182 Pac. 316 ] ; George v. Trinity Church, 176 Cal. 553 [ 169 Pac. 69 ] ; 16 Am. & Eng. … Ency. of Law, 2d ed., p. 187; Buckingham v. Commary-Peterson Co., 39 Cal. App. 154 [ 178 Pac. 318 ]; Moody v. Industrial Acc. Com., 204 Cal. 670 [60 A. L. R. 299, 269 Pac. 542 ]; Brown v. Industrial Acc.

Centinela Hospital Assn. v. City of Inglewood

225 Cal. App. 3d 1586 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 1990

(County of San Luis Obispo v. … Governing Board (1981) 116 Cal.App.3d 831, 846 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 312 ]; Stribling v. Mailliard (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 470, 474 [ 85 Cal.Rptr. 924 ]; see also Adler v.

People v. Becker

112 Cal. App. 2d 324 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 1952

112 Cal.App.2d 324 (1952) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ROY J. BECKER, Appellant. Crim. No. 4741. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. One. July 21, 1952. S. V. O. Prichard for Appellant. Edmund G. … Code, 7, subds. 1 and 3; People v. Harby, 51 Cal.App.2d 759, 767 [ 125 P.2d 874 ].) As Mr. Presiding Justice Moore says in People v.

Stapp v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co.

34 Cal. App. 41 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1917

(See Mitchell v. Taylor, 27 Or. 377 , [ 41 Pac. 119 ]; Erickson v. Brookings Co., 3 S. D. 434, [18 L. R. A. 347, 53 N. W. 857 ] ; Norfolk & W. R. Co. v. Read, 87 Va. 185 , [ 12 S. E. 395 ] ; Jordan v. … Brown, defendant’s general superintendent, said that the standards at the head-gate were “some rotten.”

Southern California Ass'n of Seventh-Day Adventists v. Franchise Tax Board

47 Cal. App. 3d 207 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1975

In Brown v. Merlo, 8 Cal.3d 855 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 ] 7 our Supreme Court succinctly summarizes “classification” standards when applied to the equal protection issue. … Board stipulated in writing at trial that this was the reason for the statute’s enactment. Cases cited by Board that delineate the “reasonable basis” or “rational relation” rule are: Carmichael v.

Sacramento County Employees Organization v. County of Sacramento

201 Cal. App. 3d 845 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1988

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [].) A construction rendering statutory language surplusage “‘is to be avoided.” ’ (Moyer v. Workmen’s *856 Comp. … Appeals Bd. (1973) 10 Cal.3d 222, 230 []; People v. Gilbert (1969) 1 Cal.3d 475, 480 [].)” (Brown v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 477, 484-485 [ 208 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 691 P.2d 272 ].)

Shahvar v. Superior Court

25 Cal. App. 4th 653 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1994

The court noted that a statement to newspaper reporters about a National Labor Relation Board decision had been found to be outside the litigation privilege in Washer v. … (Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 747 [citations].)” (Carney v. Santa Cruz Women Against Rape (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 1009, 1019 [ 271 Cal.Rptr. 30 ].) We find guidance in Brown v.

SPRAWLDEF v. Dept. of Resources Recycling and Recovery

California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 2019

Brown Act (Brown Act; Gov. … (Id. at p. 594, citing Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 860 (Browning- Ferris).)

Sultan Turkish Bath, Inc. v. BOARD OF POLICE COMRS. OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES

169 Cal. App. 2d 188 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1959

In reviewing proceedings before the board this court is bound to disregard all evidence contrary to that received in support of the findings of the board. (Thompson v. … (Lawton v. Board of Medical Examiners, 143 Cal.App.2d 256, 260-261 [ 299 P.2d 362 ].)

People v. Dore

146 Cal. App. 2d 541 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1956

Beauchamp entered the car to check the registration and observed a brown multi-colored handkerchief and a brown paper bag lying on the front seat. … Officer Beauchamp testified: “As the car went by me I got a flashing glimpse of Hooker’s leaning forward with his hands either down close to the floor board or up partially underneath the dashboard. ’ ’ It could reasonably

Helbing v. Helbing

89 Cal. App. 2d 224 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1948

Morrison, 88 Cal.App. 664, 669 [ 264 P. 256 ]; Estate of Brix, 181 Cal. 667, 674-5 [ 186 P. 135 ]; Schader v. White, 173 Cal. 441, 446 [ 160 P. 557 ]; Page v. Brown, 122 Cal.App. 12, 18-19 [ 9 P.2d 895 ]; Cushing v. … (Smith v. Lombard, 201 Cal. 518, 524 [258 P. 55]; Brown v. Canadian Indus. Alcohol Co., 209 Cal. 596, 599 [ 289 P. 613 ]; Burnham v. Witt, 217 Cal. 397 [ 18 P.2d 949 ]; Combs v.

Taylor v. Martin

28 Cal. App. 3d 1057 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1972

Social Welfare Dept., 45 Cal.2d 524, 529 [ 289 P.2d 485 ]; County of Contra Costa v. Social Welfare Board, 199 Cal. App.2d 468, 472-473 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 573 ]. The code (Well & Inst. … Brown (H. C.), J., and Caldecott, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied January 11, 1973.

Martin v. Municipal Court

148 Cal. App. 3d 693 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 1983

(See Gilbert v. Municipal Court (1977) 73 Cal.App.3d 723 , *696 728-729 [ 140 Cal.Rptr. 897 ]; Burrus v. Municipal Court (1973) 36 Cal.App.3d 233, 238 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 539 ]; Overby v. … In People v. Rossi (1976) 18 Cal.3d 295 [ 134 Cal.Rptr. 64 , 555 P.2d 1313 ] and People v.

Tahoe Vista Concerned Citizens v. County of Placer

96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 880 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 2000

Industries v. … (Browning-Ferris Industries v. City Council, supra, 181 Cal.App.3d at p. 860 .)

La Verne Ramsden v. W. Union

71 Cal. App. 3d 873 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1977

. *880 (Collins v. Owens, supra, at pp. 715, 718 ; Kaufman v. Brown, supra, at pp. 511, 512 .) … (Kaufman v. Brown, supra.)

Loyola Marymount University v. Los Angeles Unified School District

45 Cal. App. 4th 1256 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1996

(Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing Board (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 218, 231 [ 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 818 ], quoted with approval on other points in Grupe Development Co. v. … For guidance we turn to U.S. v. Brown University (3d Cir. 1993) 5 F.3d 658 , 666, cited to us by the LAUSD.

Roberts v. Packard, Packard & Johnson

217 Cal. App. 4th 822 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 3, 2013

The net award to Brown was $663,293. Brown appealed. (Frog Creek, at p. 523.) … Finally, if a party is dissatisfied with the award of the arbitrator, the court may correct or vacate it.‖ (California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Board (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 393, 399, citations omitted.)

People v. Carranza

California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2019

(See People v. … (See People v.

Fillerup v. Franchise Tax Board CA3

California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 2024

Filed 12/11/24 Fillerup v. … (Wolf v.

Leahey v. Department of Water & Power

76 Cal. App. 2d 281 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1946

Proc., § 1085 ; Lotts v. Board of Park Comrs., 13 Cal.App.2d 625, 634 [ 57 P.2d 215 ] ; Shannon v. … Proc., § 338, subd. 1 ; Curtin v. Board of Police Comrs., 74 Cal.App. 77, 82 [ 239 P. 355 ] ; Jones v. Board of Police Comrs., 141 Cal. 96, 98 [ 74 P. 696 ] ; Wittman v.