Case law

Western Los Angeles Citizens' Committee on Liquor Licenses v. State Board of Equalization

111 Cal. App. 2d 843 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1952

meas-used by “following the shortest road or roads connecting the points in question. ’ ’ The trial court adopted the measurement to the south entrance of the building and consequently found the distance to be less than V/ … The board must decide one way or the other.

Slyter v. Clinton Construction Co.

107 Cal. App. 348 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 25, 1930

(Green v. Soule, 145 Cal. 96 [ 78 Pac. 337 ]; Brown v. Board of Trustees, 41 Cal. App. 100 -108 [ 182 Pac. 316 ] ; George v. Trinity Church, 176 Cal. 553 [ 169 Pac. 69 ] ; 16 Am. & Eng. … Ency. of Law, 2d ed., p. 187; Buckingham v. Commary-Peterson Co., 39 Cal. App. 154 [ 178 Pac. 318 ]; Moody v. Industrial Acc. Com., 204 Cal. 670 [60 A. L. R. 299, 269 Pac. 542 ]; Brown v. Industrial Acc.

Spore v. Washington

96 Cal. App. 345 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1929

(Brown v. Pepperdine, 53 Cal. App. 336 [ 200 Pac. 36 ].) … In Capwell v. Blake, 9 Cal.

People v. ENG

114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 856 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 2001

As Firefighter Caro was pointing this out to appellant, he noticed a small baggie on the floor containing a brown substance wet on the outside and hard in the middle. It appeared to be brown tar heroin. … Coast Guard boardings are an effective means for policing compliance with safety and documentation regulations and as a practical matter there are no feasible, less intrusive alternatives. (United States v.

Ransom v. Los Angeles City High School District

129 Cal. App. 2d 500 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 1954

(Nickerson v. San Bernardino County, 179 Cal. 518 [ 177 P. 465 ].)” (See also Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals, 23 Cal.2d 303, 315 [ 144 P.2d 4 ]; Cramer v. … (Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 124 Cal. 274, 279 [ 57 P. 82 ]; Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals, 23 Cal.2d 303, 315 , supra.)

State ex rel. State Public Works Board v. City of Los Angeles

256 Cal. App. 2d 930 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 1967

In support of its contentions, appellant cites Department of Public Works & Buildings v. … Proc., §§ 1240, subd. 3, and 1241, subd. 3; People v.

Organization of Deputy Sheriffs of San Mateo County, Inc. v. County of San Mateo

48 Cal. App. 3d 331 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1975

(Fillmore Union High School Dist. v. Cobb (1935) 5 Cal.2d 26, 33 [ 53 P.2d 349 ]; Dept. Alcoholic Bev. Control v. Alcoholic Bev. Control Appeals Board (1959) 169 Cal.App.2d 785, 792-793 [ 338 P.2d 50 ].) … If reasonable minds may be divided as to the wisdom of a board’s action, its action is conclusive and courts should not substitute their judgment *339 for that of the board. (Rible v.

Girth v. Thompson

11 Cal. App. 3d 325 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 18, 1970

In the event the board refuses to effect such changes, it may be compelled to perform its duty in the premises. (Griffin v. Board of Supervisors, 60 Cal.2d 318 , 322 *329 [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 101 , 384 P.2d 421 ]; Thompson v. … (Silver v. Brown, 63 Cal.2d 270, 272 [ 46 Cal.Rptr. 308 , 405 P.2d 132 ]; Henderson v. Superior Court, 61 Cal.2d 883 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 438 , 390 P.2d 206 ]; Miller v.

Centinela Hospital Assn. v. City of Inglewood

225 Cal. App. 3d 1586 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 1990

(County of San Luis Obispo v. … Governing Board (1981) 116 Cal.App.3d 831, 846 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 312 ]; Stribling v. Mailliard (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 470, 474 [ 85 Cal.Rptr. 924 ]; see also Adler v.

Quinn v. U.S. Bank NA

196 Cal. App. 4th 168 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 2011

(dis. opn. of Brown, J.).) … (Adoption of Kelsey S. (1992) 1 Cal.4th 816, 829 [ 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 615 , 823 P.2d 1216 ]; see also Board of Supervisors v.

American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

23 Cal. App. 4th 51 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 1994

The board’s version of those facts may not be disturbed unless it lacks substantial support on the face of the decision.” (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 111.) … In Luck v.

California State Employees' Ass'n v. California Public Employees' Retirement System Board of Administration

113 Cal. App. 4th 137 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 7, 2003

(People v. Rizo (2000) 22 Cal.4th 681, 685 [ 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 375 , 996 P.2d 27 ].) … (Delaney v. Superior Court (1990) 50 Cal.3d 785, 804 [ 268 Cal.Rptr. 753 , 789 P.2d 934 ].)

Millview County Water District v. State Water Resources Control Board

4 Cal. App. 5th 7259 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 2016

(Norberg v. … (Id. at p. 60; see Young v.

CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSN. v. State

171 Cal. App. 4th 1183 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 2009

(San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 574 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ].) … (Le Francois v.

Turner v. County of Del Norte

24 Cal. App. 3d 311 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1972

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. … County of Riverside, 218 Cal.App.2d 205 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 318 ]; Peacock v. County of Sacramento, 271 Cal.App.2d 845 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 391 ]; and Beckley v. Reclamation Board, 205 Cal.App.2d 734 [ 23 Cal.Rptr. 428 ].

Parkmerced Residents Organization v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board

210 Cal. App. 3d 1235 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1989

Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Co., 300 U.S. 481, 491 (1937). ‘[S]uch an ultimate finding was not enough . . . in the absence of a basic finding to support it. . . .’ United States v. … Morgan v. United States, 298 U.S. 468, 480 .” (3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise (2d ed. 1980) § 14:27, p. 124.) In Sierra Club v.

Zhigulina v. Board of Education of Los Angeles Unified School District

207 Cal. App. 3d 159 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1989

(Crimsley v. Board of Trustees (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 1440, 1447 [ 235 Cal.Rptr. 85 ].) Comstock v. Board of Trustees, etc. (1939) 35 Cal.App.2d 466, 470-471 [ 95 P.2d 969 ], followed by Ward v. Fremont Unified Sch. … We follow Grimsley v. Board of Trustees, supra, 189 Cal.App.3d 1440 , in holding that the procedures of sections 44882(b) and 44948.3 are alternative procedures.

Union Oil Co. v. South Coast Regional Commission

92 Cal. App. 3d 327 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1979

In 1958, pursuant to an order of the Board of Harbor Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles (Board) and Construction and Lease Agreement No. 485 between the Board and Union Oil Company of *329 California (Union), the latter … (Brown v. World Church (1969) 272 Cal.App.2d 684, 690-691 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 669 , 45 A.L.R.3d 622 ].)

Van de Kamps Coalition v. Board of Trustees of Los Angeles Community College District

206 Cal. App. 4th 1036 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 2012

(Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court, supra, 23 Cal.App.4th at p. 836 .) … (Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court, supra, at p. 837.)

People v. Dore

146 Cal. App. 2d 541 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 1956

Beauchamp entered the car to check the registration and observed a brown multi-colored handkerchief and a brown paper bag lying on the front seat. … Officer Beauchamp testified: “As the car went by me I got a flashing glimpse of Hooker’s leaning forward with his hands either down close to the floor board or up partially underneath the dashboard. ’ ’ It could reasonably