Case law

Aden v. Younger

57 Cal. App. 3d 662 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1976

Brown, 9 Cal.3d 199, 202-203 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 137 , 507 P.2d 1345 ]; Jolicoeur v. Mihaly, 5 Cal.3d 565, 570 , fns. 1 & 2 [ 96 Cal.Rptr. 697 , 488 P.2d 1 ]; San Francisco Unified School Dist. v. … Johnson, 3 Cal.3d 937, 944 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 309 , 479 P.2d 669 ]; State Board of Equalization v. Watson, 68 Cal.2d 307 [ 66 Cal.Rptr. 377 , 437 P.2d 761 ]; County of Sacramento v.

Ogle v. Eckel

49 Cal. App. 2d 599 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1942

App. 446 [ 123 Pac. 350 ]; Pratt v. Browne, 135 Cal. 649 [ 67 Pac. 1082 ] ; Welsh v. Bramlet, 98 Cal. 219 [ 33 Pac. 66 ]. … (Davis v. County of Los Angeles, 12 Cal. (2d) 412 [ 84 Pac. (2d) 1034 ]; Board of Law Library Trustees of Orange County v. Board of Supervisors, 99 Cal. 571, 573 [ 34 Pac. 244 ].)

Sechrist v. Municipal Court

64 Cal. App. 3d 737 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 1976

(City of *746 Knoxville v. Brown (1953) 195 Tenn. 501 [ 260 S.W.2d 264, 269 ].) … (Thomas v. Zoning Board of Adjustment (Tex.Civ.App. 1951) 241 S.W.2d 955, 958-959 .)

Service Employees International Union v. Superior Court

112 Cal. App. 3d 712 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 1980

In general, the Board has exclusive jurisdiction over conduct either protected or prohibited under the NLRA. (Kaplan’s Fruit & Produce Co. v. … (Kaplan’s Fruit & Produce Co., supra, 26 Cal.3d 60, 68-69 ; Auto Workers v. Wisconsin Board (1956) 351 U.S. 266 [ 100 L.Ed. 1162 , 76 S.Ct. 794 ].)

CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSN. v. State

171 Cal. App. 4th 1183 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 2009

(San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 574 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ].) … (Le Francois v.

State ex rel. State Public Works Board v. City of Los Angeles

256 Cal. App. 2d 930 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 1967

In support of its contentions, appellant cites Department of Public Works & Buildings v. … Proc., §§ 1240, subd. 3, and 1241, subd. 3; People v.

Ackerman v. State Personnel Bd.

145 Cal. App. 3d 395 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1983

Romanski and Hession, Creedon, Hamlin, Kelly, Hanson & Brown for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION FEINBERG, J. … Public officials such as judges, policemen, and school teachers fall into such a category." ( Board of Trustees v. Stubblefield (1971) 16 Cal. App.3d 820, 824 [ 94 Cal. Rptr. 318 ]; see also, Titus v.

Turner v. County of Del Norte

24 Cal. App. 3d 311 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1972

Opinion BROWN (H. C.), J. … County of Riverside, 218 Cal.App.2d 205 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 318 ]; Peacock v. County of Sacramento, 271 Cal.App.2d 845 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 391 ]; and Beckley v. Reclamation Board, 205 Cal.App.2d 734 [ 23 Cal.Rptr. 428 ].

McDonald v. ANTELOPE VALLEY COLLEGE DIST.

61 Cal. Rptr. 3d 62 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 2007

Brown appealed the Traub firm's findings to defendant's board of trustees. Defendant's board of trustees affirmed the findings of the investigation. … Defendant's board of trustees found Ms. Brown's discrimination claims to be without merit. In November 2002, Ms. Brown appealed the district's conclusions. In May 2003, Dr.

Union Oil Co. v. South Coast Regional Commission

92 Cal. App. 3d 327 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1979

In 1958, pursuant to an order of the Board of Harbor Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles (Board) and Construction and Lease Agreement No. 485 between the Board and Union Oil Company of *329 California (Union), the latter … (Brown v. World Church (1969) 272 Cal.App.2d 684, 690-691 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 669 , 45 A.L.R.3d 622 ].)

Millview County Water District v. State Water Resources Control Board

4 Cal. App. 5th 7259 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 2016

(Norberg v. … (Id. at p. 60; see Young v.

Associates Discount Corp. v. Tobb Co.

241 Cal. App. 2d 541 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1966

Board of Equalization, supra, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 ; San Bernardino Fire & Police Protective League v. … Brown (Gerald), P.

San Joaquin Delta Junior College District v. State Board of Education

263 Cal. App. 2d 296 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 19, 1968

(Home Bldg. & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell (1934) 290 U.S. 398, 447-448 [ 78 L.Ed. 413, 434 , 54 S.Ct. 231 , 88 A.L.R. 1481 ] ; People v. San Francisco (1869) 36 Cal. 595, 601 ; Stokes v. … City of Pasadena v. City of Monterey Park (1919) 40 Cal.App. 715 [ 181 P. 825 ], and the latest of which appears to be.Fuller v. San Bernardino Valley Mun.

Frost v. Trustees of California State University & Colleges

46 Cal. App. 3d 225 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1975

Personnel Board and State Controller. … (Caminetti v. Board of Trustees (1934) 1 Cal.2d 354 [ 34 P.2d 1021 ]; Goldsmith v. Board of *229 Education (1923) 63 Cal.App. 141 [ 218 P. 296 ]; Reed v. Board of Education (1934) 139 Cal.App. 661 [ 34 P.2d 758 ].)

JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations

48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 563 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 2006

(County of Alameda v. Board of Retirement, supra, 46 Cal.3d at p. 907.) A fundamental right may also be vested by statute. (Kerrigan v. … (County of Alameda v. Board of Retirement, supra, 46 Cal.3d at p. 907.)

Huntington Beach Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of Huntington Beach

58 Cal. App. 3d 492 · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 1976

(Flora Crane Service, Inc. v. Ross, 61 Cal.2d 199, 203 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 425 , 390 P.2d 193 ]; May v. Board of Directors, 34 Cal.2d 125, 133-134 [ 208 P.2d 661 ].) … In Fire Fighters Union v.

Pacific Paving Co. v. Verso

12 Cal. App. 362 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 3, 1910

(Richardson v. Heydenfeldt, 46 Cal. 68 ; Fay v. Reed, 128 Cal. 357 , [ 60 Pac. 927 ]; Bay Rock Co. v. Bell, 133 Cal. 150 , [ 65 Pac. 299 ] ; Piedmont Paving Co. v. Allman, 136 Cal. 88 , [ 68 Pac. 493 ] ; Treanor v. … (Ryan v. Altschul, 103 Cal. 174 , [ 37 Pac. 339 ]; Kenny v. Kelly, 113 Cal. 364 , [ 45 Pac. 699 ]; Diggins v. *369 Brown, 76 Cal. 318 , [ 18 Pac. 373 ]; San Diego Investment Co. v.

Atlas Hotels, Inc. v. Acker

230 Cal. App. 2d 658 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 1964

(Geiger v. Board of Supervisors, 48 Cal.2d 832, 835 [ 313 P.2d 545 ].) … Appellants also draw an analogy to Simpson v. Hite, 36 Cal.2d 125 [ 222 P.2d 225 ], and to Mueller v. Brown, 221 Cal.

People v. Langdon

54 Cal. App. 3d 384 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1976

Spencer (1894) 103 Cal. 498, 499 [ 37 P. 483 ]; Byers v. Board of Supervisors (1968) 262 *389 Cal.App.2d 148, 157 [ 68 Cal.Rptr. 549 ]; H. D. Haley & Co. v. McVay (1924) 70 Cal. App. 438, 441-442 [ 233 P. 409 ].) … Moreover, the power of the board of supervisors to act under authority delegated to it by the Legislature must be measured by applicable statutes. (Hammond Lbr. Co. v.

Western Los Angeles Citizens' Committee on Liquor Licenses v. State Board of Equalization

111 Cal. App. 2d 843 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1952

meas-used by “following the shortest road or roads connecting the points in question. ’ ’ The trial court adopted the measurement to the south entrance of the building and consequently found the distance to be less than V/ … The board must decide one way or the other.